Zwonitzer Kendra D, Iverson Erik N K, Sterling Jess E, Weaver Ryan J, Maclaine Bradley A, Havird Justin C
Am Nat. 2023 Oct;202(4):E121-E129. doi: 10.1086/725805. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
AbstractDisentangling different types of selection is a common goal in molecular evolution. Elevated / ratios (the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rates) in focal lineages are often interpreted as signs of positive selection. Paradoxically, relaxed purifying selection can also result in elevated / ratios, but tests to distinguish these two causes are seldomly implemented. Here, we reevaluated seven case studies describing elevated / ratios in animal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and their accompanying hypotheses regarding selection. They included flightless lineages versus flighted lineages in birds, bats, and insects and physiological adaptations in snakes, two groups of electric fishes, and primates. We found that elevated / ratios were often not caused by the predicted mechanism, and we sometimes found strong support for the opposite mechanism. We discuss reasons why energetic hypotheses may be confounded by other selective forces acting on mtDNA and caution against overinterpreting singular molecular signals, including elevated / ratios.
摘要
区分不同类型的选择是分子进化研究中的一个常见目标。焦点谱系中升高的ω比率(非同义替换率与同义替换率之比)通常被解释为正选择的迹象。矛盾的是,放松的纯化选择也会导致ω比率升高,但很少进行区分这两种原因的测试。在这里,我们重新评估了七个案例研究,这些研究描述了动物线粒体DNA(mtDNA)中升高的ω比率及其相关的选择假设。它们包括鸟类、蝙蝠和昆虫中的无飞行能力谱系与有飞行能力谱系,以及蛇、两组电鱼和灵长类动物的生理适应性。我们发现,升高的ω比率往往不是由预测的机制引起的,而且我们有时会发现对相反机制的有力支持。我们讨论了能量假说可能被作用于mtDNA的其他选择力混淆的原因,并告诫不要过度解读单一的分子信号,包括升高的ω比率。