• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价 CorPath GRX 机器人系统在颅内动脉瘤血管内栓塞治疗中的有效性和安全性。

Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the CorPath GRX robotic system in endovascular embolization procedures of cerebral aneurysms.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Department of Neurointervention, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Mar 14;16(4):405-411. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020161.

DOI:10.1136/jnis-2023-020161
PMID:37793795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10958306/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted neurointervention was recently introduced, with implications that it could be used to treat neurovascular diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the robotic-assisted platform CorPath GRX for treating cerebral aneurysms.

METHODS

This prospective, international, multicenter study enrolled patients with brain aneurysms that required endovascular coiling and/or stent-assisted coiling. The primary effectiveness endpoint was defined as successful completion of the robotic-assisted endovascular procedure without any unplanned conversion to manual treatment with guidewire or microcatheter navigation, embolization coil(s) or intracranial stent(s) deployment, or an inability to navigate vessel anatomy. The primary safety endpoint included intraprocedural and periprocedural events.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 117 patients (74.4% female) with mean age of 56.6 years from 10 international sites,. Headache was the most common presenting symptom in 40/117 (34.2%) subjects. Internal carotid artery was the most common location (34/122, 27.9%), and the mean aneurysm height and neck width were 5.7±2.6 mm and 3.5±1.4 mm, respectively. The overall procedure time was 117.3±47.3 min with 59.4±32.6 min robotic procedure time. Primary effectiveness was achieved in 110/117 (94%) subjects with seven subjects requiring conversion to manual for procedure completion. Only four primary safety events were recorded with two intraprocedural aneurysm ruptures and two strokes. A Raymond-Roy Classification Scale score of 1 was achieved in 71/110 (64.5%) subjects, and all subjects were discharged with a modified Rankin Scale score of ≤2.

CONCLUSIONS

This first-of-its-kind robotic-assisted neurovascular trial demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of the CorPath GRX System for endovascular embolization of cerebral aneurysm procedures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04236856.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助神经介入技术最近被引入,其可能用于治疗神经血管疾病。

目的

评估 CorPath GRX 机器人辅助平台治疗脑动脉瘤的有效性和安全性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、国际性、多中心研究,纳入了需要血管内线圈栓塞和/或支架辅助线圈栓塞治疗的脑动脉瘤患者。主要有效性终点定义为机器人辅助血管内手术成功完成,没有任何计划外转为手动治疗,包括导丝或微导管导航、栓塞线圈或颅内支架部署,或无法进行血管解剖导航。主要安全性终点包括手术过程中和围手术期事件。

结果

研究纳入了来自 10 个国际中心的 117 名(74.4%为女性)平均年龄为 56.6 岁的患者。头痛是 40/117(34.2%)患者最常见的首发症状。颈内动脉是最常见的部位(34/122,27.9%),平均动脉瘤高度和颈部宽度分别为 5.7±2.6mm 和 3.5±1.4mm。总手术时间为 117.3±47.3 分钟,机器人手术时间为 59.4±32.6 分钟。主要有效性在 110/117(94%)名患者中实现,7 名患者需要转为手动完成手术。仅记录了 4 起主要安全性事件,包括 2 起术中动脉瘤破裂和 2 起卒中。71/110(64.5%)名患者达到 Raymond-Roy 分类量表 1 级,所有患者出院时改良 Rankin 量表评分≤2。

结论

这是首例机器人辅助神经血管试验,证明了 CorPath GRX 系统在脑动脉瘤血管内栓塞治疗中的有效性和安全性。

试验注册号

NCT04236856。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c924/10958306/bb70eb7197b5/jnis-2023-020161f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c924/10958306/bb70eb7197b5/jnis-2023-020161f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c924/10958306/bb70eb7197b5/jnis-2023-020161f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the CorPath GRX robotic system in endovascular embolization procedures of cerebral aneurysms.评价 CorPath GRX 机器人系统在颅内动脉瘤血管内栓塞治疗中的有效性和安全性。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Mar 14;16(4):405-411. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020161.
2
Robotic-assisted intracranial aneurysm treatment: 1 year follow-up imaging and clinical outcomes.机器人辅助颅内动脉瘤治疗:1 年随访影像学和临床结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):1229-1233. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017865. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Robotically assisted deployment of flow diverter stents for the treatment of cerebral and cervical aneurysms.机器人辅助血流导向装置置入术治疗颅内和颈部动脉瘤。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Mar 14;16(4):412-417. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019968.
4
The safety and effectiveness of the LVIS stent system for the treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms: final results of the pivotal US LVIS trial.LVIS 支架系统治疗宽颈颅内动脉瘤的安全性和有效性:美国 LVIS 关键性试验的最终结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Apr;11(4):357-361. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014309. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
5
Early experience with the Penumbra SMART coil in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Safety and efficacy.Penumbra SMART 线圈在颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗中的早期经验:安全性与有效性。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2016 Dec;22(6):654-658. doi: 10.1177/1591019916663479. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
6
First-in-human, robotic-assisted neuroendovascular intervention.首例人体机器人辅助神经血管介入治疗。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):338-340. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015671.rep. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Pivotal Trial of the Neuroform Atlas Stent for Treatment of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms: One-Year Outcomes.Neuroform Atlas 支架治疗前循环动脉瘤的关键试验:一年结果。
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2087-2094. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028418. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Neuroform Atlas Stent for Treatment of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: 1-Year Outcomes From Neuroform Atlas Stent Pivotal Trial.Neuroform Atlas 支架治疗大脑中动脉动脉瘤:Neuroform Atlas 支架关键试验的 1 年结果。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Jun 15;89(1):102-108. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab090.
9
Comparison of postsurgical clinical sequences between completely embolized and incompletely embolized patients with wide nicked intracranial aneurysms treated with stent assisted coil embolization technique: A STROBE-compliant study.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗宽颈颅内动脉瘤完全栓塞与不完全栓塞患者术后临床序列比较:一项遵循STROBE规范的研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(23):e10987. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010987.
10
Endovascular robotic: feasibility and proof of principle for diagnostic cerebral angiography and carotid artery stenting.血管内机器人:诊断性脑血管造影和颈动脉支架置入术的可行性和原理验证。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):345-349. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015763. Epub 2020 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Stroke Thrombectomy: A Feasibility and Efficacy Study in Flow Models.机器人辅助脑卒中血栓切除术:血流模型中的可行性和疗效研究
J Stroke. 2025 May;27(2):266-269. doi: 10.5853/jos.2024.05057. Epub 2025 May 31.
2
Haptic feedback in robotic endovascular neurosurgical intervention: A necessity or a commodity?机器人血管内神经外科手术干预中的触觉反馈:是必需品还是商品?
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Mar 18:15910199241304851. doi: 10.1177/15910199241304851.
3
Robotics for Neuroendovascular Therapy.用于神经血管内治疗的机器人技术。

本文引用的文献

1
A technical guide to robotic catheter angiography with the Corindus CorPath GRX system.Corindus CorPath GRX 系统机器人导管血管造影技术指南。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):1284. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018347. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
2
Robotic-assisted intracranial aneurysm treatment: 1 year follow-up imaging and clinical outcomes.机器人辅助颅内动脉瘤治疗:1 年随访影像学和临床结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):1229-1233. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017865. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Feasibility of robot-assisted neuroendovascular procedures.
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025;19(1). doi: 10.5797/jnet.ra.2024-0112. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Neuroendovascular Procedures.神经血管介入手术中的人工智能
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025;19(1). doi: 10.5797/jnet.ra.2024-0107. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
5
Robotic neurointervention: Beyond the noise.机器人神经介入:超越喧嚣。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Feb 3:15910199241298323. doi: 10.1177/15910199241298323.
6
In the era of transition from fiction to reality: Robotic-assisted neurointervention-a systematic review and meta-analysis.在从虚构走向现实的时代:机器人辅助神经介入治疗——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Dec 27;48(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03155-9.
7
Exploring robotic advances, applications, and challenges in neuroendovascular surgery: A scoping review of the CorPath GRX system.探索神经血管内手术中的机器人技术进展、应用及挑战:CorPath GRX系统的范围综述
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Dec 20:15910199241305691. doi: 10.1177/15910199241305691.
8
Robotic spinal angiography: A single-center experience.机器人辅助脊髓血管造影:单中心经验
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug 8:15910199241272515. doi: 10.1177/15910199241272515.
9
Flow Diversion for Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Past, Present, and Future Directions.颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗的血流导向:过去、现在与未来方向
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 16;13(14):4167. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144167.
10
Telestroke network to robotic telestroke network: How to upgrade regional stroke care to include remote robotics?远程卒中网络到机器人远程卒中网络:如何升级区域卒中护理以纳入远程机器人技术?
Digit Health. 2024 May 15;10:20552076241254986. doi: 10.1177/20552076241254986. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
机器人辅助神经血管介入手术的可行性。
J Neurosurg. 2021 Sep 24;136(4):992-1004. doi: 10.3171/2021.1.JNS203617. Print 2022 Apr 1.
4
Comparison of robotic-assisted carotid stenting and manual carotid stenting through the transradial approach.经桡动脉途径机器人辅助颈动脉支架置入术与手动颈动脉支架置入术的比较。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Aug 28;135(1):21-28. doi: 10.3171/2020.5.JNS201421. Print 2021 Jul 1.
5
First-in-human, robotic-assisted neuroendovascular intervention.首例人体机器人辅助神经血管介入治疗。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):338-340. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015671.rep. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Neurovascular Interventions: Initial Experience in Flow Model and Porcine Model.机器人辅助神经血管介入的可行性:血流模型和猪模型的初步经验。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Feb 1;86(2):309-314. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz064.
7
Stent assisted coiling versus non-stent assisted coiling for the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review.支架辅助栓塞与非支架辅助栓塞治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤的效果比较:Meta 分析和系统评价。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 May;11(5):489-496. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014388. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
Procedural Clinical Complications, Case-Fatality Risks, and Risk Factors in Endovascular and Neurosurgical Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.血管内和神经外科治疗未破裂颅内动脉瘤的程序临床并发症、病死率风险和危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Mar 1;76(3):282-293. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4165.
9
Robotically performed excimer laser coronary atherectomy: Proof of feasibility.机器人冠状动脉粥样斑块切除术:可行性验证。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):713-716. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27589. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
10
Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.一种新型第二代机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入系统的安全性和可行性:首例人体报告
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Apr;30(4):152-156. Epub 2018 Jan 15.