Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Sex Med Rev. 2023 Dec 23;12(1):14-25. doi: 10.1093/sxmrev/qead039.
Lasers are commonly used for treating various vaginal/vulvar conditions. To date, there is to our knowledge no available literature review on the effects of different types of lasers for the treatment of women with vulvodynia, a condition that causes chronic pain in the vulvar area.
We sought to review the literature and summarize the existing published evidence regarding the effects of lasers for the treatment of women with vulvodynia.
A scoping review with a systematic search was conducted that included studies investigating the use of laser treatment in women with vulvodynia. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools were used for the quality assessment. The type of laser, effects on pain and function, and participants' perceived improvement as well as adverse events were analyzed.
Eight studies investigating laser therapy were included in the analysis: 1 randomized controlled trial, 5 before-after studies, 1 nonrandomized intervention study, and 1 case report. Several types of laser therapies were identified, ranging from mild noninvasive photobiomodulation to more invasive ablative procedures. Of the 6 studies that included pain outcomes, 3 studies showed statistically significant improvements from baseline to follow-up, and 3 demonstrated a reduction in pain from subjectively interpreted data. Similarly, each of the 2 studies investigating sexual function also reported an improvement (based only on subjective interpretation). Of the 2 studies with a comparison group, neither study was adequately powered to detect between-group differences. Furthermore, 57%-78% of participants reported improvement, with 1 study showing a greater statistically significant improvement in the low-level laser therapy patient group compared to the sham laser group. Outcomes and adverse events varied depending on the type of laser used.
Although these studies demonstrated some benefits of laser therapy for the treatment of vulvodynia, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the scarcity of the included studies that were robust and sufficiently powered. Future research should focus on conducting well-designed randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of different types of lasers in the treatment of vulvodynia.
激光常用于治疗各种阴道/外阴疾病。迄今为止,据我们所知,尚无关于不同类型激光治疗外阴痛的文献综述,外阴痛是一种导致外阴区域慢性疼痛的疾病。
我们旨在回顾文献并总结现有关于激光治疗外阴痛的证据。
进行了范围广泛的综述,并进行了系统搜索,包括研究激光治疗外阴痛的使用。使用美国国立心肺血液研究所研究质量评估工具进行质量评估。分析了激光类型、对疼痛和功能的影响、参与者感知的改善以及不良事件。
纳入了 8 项激光治疗研究:1 项随机对照试验、5 项前后对照研究、1 项非随机干预研究和 1 项病例报告。确定了几种类型的激光治疗方法,从轻度非侵入性的光生物调节到更具侵入性的消融性手术。在纳入疼痛结局的 6 项研究中,3 项研究显示从基线到随访有统计学意义的改善,3 项研究根据主观解释的数据显示疼痛减轻。同样,对 2 项研究性功能的研究也报告了改善(仅基于主观解释)。在 2 项具有对照组的研究中,都没有足够的力量来检测组间差异。此外,57%-78%的参与者报告有所改善,其中 1 项研究显示低水平激光治疗组与假激光组相比,统计学上有更大的改善。结果和不良事件因所使用的激光类型而异。
尽管这些研究表明激光治疗外阴痛有一定的益处,但考虑到纳入的研究数量较少,且研究质量和力量都不够,这些发现应谨慎解释。未来的研究应侧重于设计良好的随机对照试验,以评估不同类型激光治疗外阴痛的疗效。