• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随时间监测指标:为何临床试验人员需要系统地收集研究点绩效指标。

Monitoring metrics over time: Why clinical trialists need to systematically collect site performance metrics.

作者信息

Yorke-Edwards Victoria, Diaz-Montana Carlos, Murray Macey L, Sydes Matthew R, Love Sharon B

机构信息

MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.

Health Data Research UK, London, UK.

出版信息

Res Methods Med Health Sci. 2023 Sep;4(4):124-135. doi: 10.1177/26320843221147855. Epub 2022 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1177/26320843221147855
PMID:37795045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7615148/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, there has been an increasing interest in risk-based monitoring (RBM) in clinical trials, resulting in a number of guidelines from regulators and its inclusion in ICH GCP. However, there is a lack of detail on how to approach RBM from a practical perspective, and insufficient understanding of best practice.

PURPOSE

We present a method for clinical trials units to track their metrics within clinical trials using descriptive statistics and visualisations.

RESEARCH DESIGN

We suggest descriptive statistics and visualisations within a SWAT methodology.

STUDY SAMPLE

We illustrate this method using the metrics from TEMPER, a monitoring study carried out in three trials at the MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL.

DATA COLLECTION

The data collection for TEMPER is described in .

RESULTS

We show the results and discuss a protocol for a Study-Within-A-Trial (SWAT 167) for those wishing to use the method.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential benefits metric tracking brings to clinical trials include enhanced assessment of sites for potential corrective action, improved evaluation and contextualisation of the influence of metrics and their thresholds, and the establishment of best practice in RBM. The standardisation of the collection of such monitoring data would benefit both individual trials and the clinical trials community.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,临床试验中基于风险的监测(RBM)越来越受到关注,监管机构发布了多项指南,并将其纳入了ICH GCP。然而,从实际角度来看,对于如何开展RBM缺乏详细说明,对最佳实践的理解也不足。

目的

我们提出一种方法,供临床试验单位使用描述性统计和可视化手段在临床试验中跟踪其指标。

研究设计

我们建议在SWAT方法中使用描述性统计和可视化手段。

研究样本

我们使用TEMPER的指标来说明这种方法,TEMPER是在伦敦大学学院MRC临床试验单位的三项试验中进行的一项监测研究。

数据收集

TEMPER的数据收集情况在……中有描述。

结果

我们展示了结果,并为希望使用该方法的人员讨论了一项试验内研究(SWAT 167)的方案。

结论

指标跟踪给临床试验带来的潜在益处包括加强对可能需要采取纠正措施的试验点的评估、改进对指标及其阈值影响的评估和情境化,以及在RBM中确立最佳实践。此类监测数据收集的标准化将使单个试验和整个临床试验界都受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c3/7615148/54f11364ff32/EMS187694-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c3/7615148/c7ea7fb1089c/EMS187694-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c3/7615148/aba2f3365ee8/EMS187694-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c3/7615148/503f8b1eee8c/EMS187694-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c3/7615148/54f11364ff32/EMS187694-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c3/7615148/c7ea7fb1089c/EMS187694-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c3/7615148/aba2f3365ee8/EMS187694-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c3/7615148/503f8b1eee8c/EMS187694-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c3/7615148/54f11364ff32/EMS187694-f006.jpg

相似文献

1
Monitoring metrics over time: Why clinical trialists need to systematically collect site performance metrics.随时间监测指标:为何临床试验人员需要系统地收集研究点绩效指标。
Res Methods Med Health Sci. 2023 Sep;4(4):124-135. doi: 10.1177/26320843221147855. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
2
Perceived barriers and facilitators to Risk Based Monitoring in academic-led clinical trials: a mixed methods study.学术主导的临床试验中基于风险监测的认知障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究
Trials. 2017 Sep 11;18(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2148-4.
3
Risk based monitoring (RBM) tools for clinical trials: A systematic review.用于临床试验的基于风险的监测(RBM)工具:一项系统评价。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Nov;51:15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Assessing the potential for prevention or earlier detection of on-site monitoring findings from randomised controlled trials: Further analyses of findings from the prospective TEMPER triggered monitoring study.评估随机对照试验现场监测结果的预防或早期检测潜力:前瞻性 TEMPER 触发监测研究结果的进一步分析。
Clin Trials. 2021 Feb;18(1):115-126. doi: 10.1177/1740774520972650. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
6
Implementing monitoring triggers and matching of triggered and control sites in the TEMPER study: a description and evaluation of a triggered monitoring management system.在 TEMPER 研究中实施监测触发和触发与对照部位的匹配:触发监测管理系统的描述和评估。
Trials. 2019 Apr 17;20(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3301-z.
7
Impact of monitoring approaches on data quality in clinical trials.监测方法对临床试验数据质量的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jun;89(6):1756-1766. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15615. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Improving Risk Assessment in Clinical Trials: Toward a Systematic Risk-Based Monitoring Approach.改进临床试验中的风险评估:迈向基于风险的系统监测方法。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2021 Aug 28;95:100643. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2021.100643. eCollection 2021.
10
Monitoring strategies for clinical intervention studies.临床干预研究的监测策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 8;12(12):MR000051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000051.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the clinical trial site performance metrics instrument: A study protocol.临床试验现场绩效指标工具的开发:一项研究方案。
MethodsX. 2025 Jan 8;14:103165. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103165. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Past, Present, and Future.临床试验中的基于风险的监测:过去、现在和未来。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Jul;55(4):899-906. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00295-8. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
2
Time-consuming and expensive data quality monitoring procedures persist in clinical trials: A national survey.临床试验中仍存在耗时且昂贵的数据质量监测程序:一项全国性调查。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;103:106290. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106290. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
3
Clinical trial monitoring effectiveness: Remote risk-based monitoring versus on-site monitoring with 100% source data verification.
临床试验监测效果:基于风险的远程监测与 100%源数据验证的现场监测。
Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;18(2):158-167. doi: 10.1177/1740774520971254. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
A randomized evaluation of on-site monitoring nested in a multinational randomized trial.现场监测在跨国随机试验中的嵌套随机评估
Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;17(1):3-14. doi: 10.1177/1740774519881616. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
5
Impact of a targeted monitoring on data-quality and data-management workload of randomized controlled trials: A prospective comparative study.目标监测对随机对照试验数据质量和数据管理工作量的影响:一项前瞻性对比研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Dec;85(12):2784-2792. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14108. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
6
Impact of retrospective data verification to prepare the ICON6 trial for use in a marketing authorization application.回顾性数据核查对准备用于上市许可申请的 ICON6 试验的影响。
Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;16(5):502-511. doi: 10.1177/1740774519862528. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Implementing monitoring triggers and matching of triggered and control sites in the TEMPER study: a description and evaluation of a triggered monitoring management system.在 TEMPER 研究中实施监测触发和触发与对照部位的匹配:触发监测管理系统的描述和评估。
Trials. 2019 Apr 17;20(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3301-z.
8
Development of a standardised set of metrics for monitoring site performance in multicentre randomised trials: a Delphi study.多中心随机试验中监测站点表现的标准化指标集的制定:一项德尔菲研究
Trials. 2018 Oct 16;19(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2940-9.
9
Monitoring performance of sites within multicentre randomised trials: a systematic review of performance metrics.多中心随机试验中各研究点的性能监测:性能指标的系统评价
Trials. 2018 Oct 16;19(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2941-8.
10
Evaluating Source Data Verification as a Quality Control Measure in Clinical Trials.评估源数据核查作为临床试验中的一种质量控制措施
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2014 Nov;48(6):671-680. doi: 10.1177/2168479014554400.