• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

犬模型中基于脱夹微波剪刀的无缝合部分肾切除术与夹闭传统部分肾切除术的比较。

Comparison of off-clamp microwave scissors-based sutureless partial nephrectomy versus on-clamp conventional partial nephrectomy in a canine model.

作者信息

Nguyen Ha Ngoc, Yamada Atsushi, Naka Shigeyuki, Mukaisho Ken-Ichi, Tani Tohru

机构信息

Department of Advanced Medical Research and Development, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Sep 19;10:1255929. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1255929. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1255929
PMID:37795145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10546044/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the usefulness and safety of off-clamp microwave scissors-based sutureless partial nephrectomy (MSPN) with on-clamp conventional partial nephrectomy (cPN) in dogs.

METHODS

We performed off-clamp MSPN using microwave scissors (MWS) in six dogs, and on-clamp cPN in three dogs, in two-stage experiments. The bilateral kidney upper poles were resected via a midline incision under general anesthesia. After 14 days of follow-up, the lower pole resections were performed. The renal calyces exposed during renal resections were sealed and transected using MWS in off-clamp MSPN and were sutured in on-clamp cPN. In the off-clamp MSPN group, the generator's power output of MWS was set as either 50 W or 60 W for each kidney side. We compared the procedure time (PT), ischemic time (IT), blood loss (BL), and normal nephron loss (NNL) between the two techniques using the Mann-Whitney -test.

RESULTS

We successfully performed 24 off-clamp MSPNs and 12 on-clamp cPNs. The off-clamp MSPN was significantly superior to on-clamp cPN in avoiding renal ischemia (median IT, 0 min vs. 8.6 min,  < 0.001) and reducing PT (median PT, 5.8 min vs. 11.5 min,  < 0.001) and NNL (median NNL, 5.3 mm vs. 6.0 mm,  = 0.006) with comparable BL (median BL, 20.9 ml vs. 23.2 ml,  = 0.804). No bleeding and major urine leakage were noted during the reoperations.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-clamp MSPN outperforms on-clamp cPN in lowering the risks of postoperative renal function impairment in dogs.

摘要

目的

比较犬类中基于微波剪刀的无夹闭缝合法部分肾切除术(MSPN)与有夹闭传统部分肾切除术(cPN)的有效性和安全性。

方法

我们在两阶段实验中,对6只犬实施了使用微波剪刀(MWS)的无夹闭MSPN,对3只犬实施了有夹闭cPN。在全身麻醉下通过中线切口切除双侧肾上极。随访14天后,进行下极切除。在无夹闭MSPN中,使用MWS对肾切除术中暴露的肾盏进行密封和横断,在有夹闭cPN中则进行缝合。在无夹闭MSPN组中,MWS发生器的功率输出针对每侧肾脏设定为50W或60W。我们使用Mann-Whitney检验比较了两种技术之间的手术时间(PT)、缺血时间(IT)、失血量(BL)和正常肾单位损失(NNL)。

结果

我们成功实施了24例无夹闭MSPN和12例有夹闭cPN。在避免肾缺血(中位IT,0分钟对8.6分钟,<0.001)、缩短PT(中位PT,5.8分钟对11.5分钟,<0.001)和减少NNL(中位NNL,5.3毫米对6.0毫米,=0.006)方面,无夹闭MSPN明显优于有夹闭cPN,而BL相当(中位BL,20.9毫升对23.2毫升,=0.804)。再次手术期间未发现出血和严重尿液渗漏。

结论

在降低犬类术后肾功能损害风险方面,无夹闭MSPN优于有夹闭cPN。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2854/10546044/8ccf541621bd/fsurg-10-1255929-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2854/10546044/5b39a2efeb13/fsurg-10-1255929-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2854/10546044/d3237ce14f39/fsurg-10-1255929-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2854/10546044/46497d42e8d4/fsurg-10-1255929-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2854/10546044/8ccf541621bd/fsurg-10-1255929-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2854/10546044/5b39a2efeb13/fsurg-10-1255929-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2854/10546044/d3237ce14f39/fsurg-10-1255929-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2854/10546044/46497d42e8d4/fsurg-10-1255929-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2854/10546044/8ccf541621bd/fsurg-10-1255929-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of off-clamp microwave scissors-based sutureless partial nephrectomy versus on-clamp conventional partial nephrectomy in a canine model.犬模型中基于脱夹微波剪刀的无缝合部分肾切除术与夹闭传统部分肾切除术的比较。
Front Surg. 2023 Sep 19;10:1255929. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1255929. eCollection 2023.
2
Microwave Scissors-Based Sutureless Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Conventional Open Partial Nephrectomy in a Porcine Model: Usefulness and Complications.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;31(9):5804-5814. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15548-7. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
3
Feasibility of Microwave Scissors-Based Off-Clamp Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in a Porcine Model.基于微波剪刀的免夹闭腹腔镜肾部分切除术在猪模型中的可行性。
Surg Innov. 2023 Aug;30(4):419-427. doi: 10.1177/15533506231165830. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
4
Indications, techniques, outcomes, and limitations for minimally ischemic and off-clamp partial nephrectomy: a systematic review of the literature.微创缺血和无夹闭部分肾切除术的适应证、技术、结果和局限性:文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):632-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
5
Renal function is the same 6 months after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy regardless of clamp technique: analysis of outcomes for off-clamp, selective arterial clamp and main artery clamp techniques, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.机器人辅助部分肾切除术后6个月,无论采用何种钳夹技术,肾功能均相同:对无钳夹、选择性动脉钳夹和主动脉钳夹技术的结果分析,最短随访1年。
BJU Int. 2015 Jun;115(6):921-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.12975. Epub 2015 May 18.
6
Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy does not benefit short-term renal function: a matched cohort analysis.非阻断机器人辅助部分肾切除术对短期肾功能无益处:一项匹配队列分析。
J Robot Surg. 2018 Sep;12(3):401-407. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0745-6. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
7
On-clamp versus off-clamp partial nephrectomy: Propensity score-matched comparison of long-term functional outcomes.夹闭与非夹闭式部分肾切除术:长期功能结局的倾向评分匹配比较。
Int J Urol. 2019 Oct;26(10):985-991. doi: 10.1111/iju.14079. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
8
Is off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy beneficial for renal function? Data from the CLOCK trial.非阻断机器人辅助部分肾切除术对肾功能有益吗?来自CLOCK试验的数据。
BJU Int. 2022 Feb;129(2):217-224. doi: 10.1111/bju.15503. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
9
No ischemia technique, parenchymal preservation and age are the most important determinants of renal function after partial nephrectomy.无缺血技术、实质保留和年龄是肾部分切除术后肾功能的最重要决定因素。
Prog Urol. 2020 Jan;30(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
10
Nephrometry score-guided off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and short-time functional results.肾计量评分引导下的无阻断腹腔镜肾部分切除术:患者选择及短期功能结果
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 21;14(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0914-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of Microwave Scissors-Based Off-Clamp Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in a Porcine Model.基于微波剪刀的免夹闭腹腔镜肾部分切除术在猪模型中的可行性。
Surg Innov. 2023 Aug;30(4):419-427. doi: 10.1177/15533506231165830. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
Sutureless Purely Off-Clamp Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Avoiding Renorrhaphy Does Not Jeopardize Surgical and Functional Outcomes.无缝合纯夹闭机器人辅助部分肾切除术:避免肾缝合术不会危及手术和功能结果。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 23;15(3):698. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030698.
3
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update.
欧洲泌尿外科学会肾癌指南:2022 年更新版。
Eur Urol. 2022 Oct;82(4):399-410. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
4
Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy Using a Surgical Energy Device: Initial Experience in a Japanese Single-Center Cohort.使用手术能量设备的视频辅助甲状腺切除术:日本单中心队列的初步经验
Biomed Hub. 2021 Dec 10;6(3):153-157. doi: 10.1159/000520098. eCollection 2021 Sep-Dec.
5
Is off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy beneficial for renal function? Data from the CLOCK trial.非阻断机器人辅助部分肾切除术对肾功能有益吗?来自CLOCK试验的数据。
BJU Int. 2022 Feb;129(2):217-224. doi: 10.1111/bju.15503. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
6
Lung segmentectomy with novel microwave surgical instrument (Acrosurg. Revo).肺段切除术联合新型微波手术器械(Acrosurg. Revo)。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Oct;14(4):821-823. doi: 10.1111/ases.12921. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Early experience with a new integrated microwave surgical device, Acrosurg Revo®, for laparoscopic surgery: A case series of two patients.新型集成微波手术设备Acrosurg Revo®用于腹腔镜手术的早期经验:两例患者的病例系列
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021 Jan;78:375-377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.12.063. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
8
Functional and oncological outcomes of 3D clampless sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors with low nephrometry score.3D 无夹无结扎腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗低肾肿瘤评分肾肿瘤的功能和肿瘤学结果。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Dec;72(6):723-728. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04005-9. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
9
On-clamp versus purely off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in solitary kidneys: comparison of perioperative outcomes and chronic kidney disease progression at two high-volume centers.夹闭与单纯离断肾动脉机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗孤立肾:在两个高容量中心比较围手术期结果和慢性肾脏病进展。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Dec;73(6):739-745. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03795-9. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Use of hemostatic agents for surgical bleeding in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Biomaterials perspective.止血剂在腹腔镜部分肾切除术中治疗手术出血的应用:生物材料视角
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020 Nov;108(8):3099-3123. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34637. Epub 2020 May 26.