Suppr超能文献

终结对电物理因子的抵制

On Putting an End to the Backlash Against Electrophysical Agents.

作者信息

Belanger Alain-Yvan, Selkowitz David M, Lawson Daryl

机构信息

Rehabilitation Université Laval.

MGH Institute of Health Professions.

出版信息

Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Oct 2;18(5):1230-1237. doi: 10.26603/001c.87813. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Electrophysical agents (EPAs) are core therapeutic interventions in academic physical therapy curricula around the world. They are used concomitantly with several other therapeutic interventions such as exercise, manual therapy techniques, medications, and surgery for the management of a wide variety of soft tissue disorders. Over the past decade, the practice of EPAs has been the subject of intense scrutiny in the U.S. This has been colored by some physical therapists publicly engaging in bashing rhetoric that has yet to be officially and publicly addressed by the guiding organizations which, together, regulate the practice of physical therapy in this country. Published in world renowned public media are unsubstantiated mocking remarks against the practice of EPAs and unethical allegations against its stakeholders. This rhetoric suggests that EPA interventions are "magical" treatments and that those practitioners who include them in their plans of care may be committing fraud. Such bashing rhetoric is in striking contradiction to the APTA's Guide to Physical Therapist Practice 4.0, which lists EPAs as one of its categories of interventions, the CAPTE's program accreditation policy, and the FSBPT's national licensing exam. The purpose of this commentary is to expose the extent of this discourse and to call to action the APTA, CAPTE, and FSBPT organizations, as well as physical therapists, with the aim at putting an end to this rhetoric.

摘要

电物理治疗手段(EPAs)是全球物理治疗专业学术课程中的核心治疗干预措施。它们常与其他几种治疗干预措施同时使用,如运动疗法、手法治疗技术、药物治疗和手术,用于管理各种软组织疾病。在过去十年中,电物理治疗手段的应用在美国受到了严格审查。一些物理治疗师公开发表的抨击言论影响了这一情况,而该国规范物理治疗实践的指导组织尚未正式公开回应这些言论。世界著名公共媒体上发表了针对电物理治疗手段应用的毫无根据的嘲讽言论以及对其从业者的不道德指控。这种言论暗示电物理治疗手段的干预是“神奇”疗法,那些将其纳入护理计划的从业者可能存在欺诈行为。这种抨击言论与美国物理治疗协会(APTA)的《物理治疗师实践指南4.0》、美国物理治疗教育认证委员会(CAPTE)的项目认证政策以及美国物理治疗师资格考试委员会(FSBPT)的国家执照考试形成了鲜明矛盾。本评论的目的是揭示这种言论的程度,并呼吁APTA、CAPTE和FSBPT组织以及物理治疗师采取行动,以制止这种言论。

相似文献

1
On Putting an End to the Backlash Against Electrophysical Agents.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Oct 2;18(5):1230-1237. doi: 10.26603/001c.87813. eCollection 2023.
2
A national study of the availability and use of electrophysical agents by Australian physiotherapists.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2009 May;25(4):279-96. doi: 10.1080/09593980902782611.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Observations and recommendations on the investigation of clinical decision-making and usage involving electrophysical agents.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2015 Oct 8;4:54. doi: 10.1186/s13584-015-0050-7. eCollection 2015.
6
Research Agenda for Physical Therapy From the American Physical Therapy Association.
Phys Ther. 2023 Oct 3;103(10). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad126.
7
Licensure portability: assuring access to quality care in physical therapy.
Int J Telerehabil. 2014 Sep 3;6(1):25-7. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2014.6147. eCollection 2014 Spring.
8
Clinical Specialization and Adherence to Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Management: A Survey of US Physical Therapists.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 May;47(5):347-358. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.6561. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
9
Cultivating Competency in Cardiac Sonography: Aligning Entrustable Professional Activities With Industry Expectations.
Heart Lung Circ. 2024 Jul;33(7):1067-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.01.027. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
10
Benefits of EPAs at risk? The influence of the workplace environment on the uptake of EPAs in EPA-based curricula.
Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Aug;10(4):200-206. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00658-9. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 21;2022:5670303. doi: 10.1155/2022/5670303. eCollection 2022.
2
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Ultrasound Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cureus. 2022 Jan 2;14(1):e20871. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20871. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
Electrical microcurrent stimulation therapy for wound healing: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
J Tissue Viability. 2022 May;31(2):268-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
7
An Update on Narrowband Ultraviolet B Therapy for the Treatment of Skin Diseases.
Cureus. 2021 Nov 1;13(11):e19182. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19182. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Wound Healing with Electrical Stimulation Technologies: A Review.
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Nov 1;13(21):3790. doi: 10.3390/polym13213790.
9
Making the Case for Modalities: The Need for Critical Thinking in Practice.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Oct 1;16(5):28326. doi: 10.26603/001c.28326. eCollection 2021.
10
Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulation for Bone Fractures Healing: A Review.
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Mar;41(3):547-563. doi: 10.1002/jum.15738. Epub 2021 May 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验