• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终结对电物理因子的抵制

On Putting an End to the Backlash Against Electrophysical Agents.

作者信息

Belanger Alain-Yvan, Selkowitz David M, Lawson Daryl

机构信息

Rehabilitation Université Laval.

MGH Institute of Health Professions.

出版信息

Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Oct 2;18(5):1230-1237. doi: 10.26603/001c.87813. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.26603/001c.87813
PMID:37795329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10547080/
Abstract

Electrophysical agents (EPAs) are core therapeutic interventions in academic physical therapy curricula around the world. They are used concomitantly with several other therapeutic interventions such as exercise, manual therapy techniques, medications, and surgery for the management of a wide variety of soft tissue disorders. Over the past decade, the practice of EPAs has been the subject of intense scrutiny in the U.S. This has been colored by some physical therapists publicly engaging in bashing rhetoric that has yet to be officially and publicly addressed by the guiding organizations which, together, regulate the practice of physical therapy in this country. Published in world renowned public media are unsubstantiated mocking remarks against the practice of EPAs and unethical allegations against its stakeholders. This rhetoric suggests that EPA interventions are "magical" treatments and that those practitioners who include them in their plans of care may be committing fraud. Such bashing rhetoric is in striking contradiction to the APTA's Guide to Physical Therapist Practice 4.0, which lists EPAs as one of its categories of interventions, the CAPTE's program accreditation policy, and the FSBPT's national licensing exam. The purpose of this commentary is to expose the extent of this discourse and to call to action the APTA, CAPTE, and FSBPT organizations, as well as physical therapists, with the aim at putting an end to this rhetoric.

摘要

电物理治疗手段(EPAs)是全球物理治疗专业学术课程中的核心治疗干预措施。它们常与其他几种治疗干预措施同时使用,如运动疗法、手法治疗技术、药物治疗和手术,用于管理各种软组织疾病。在过去十年中,电物理治疗手段的应用在美国受到了严格审查。一些物理治疗师公开发表的抨击言论影响了这一情况,而该国规范物理治疗实践的指导组织尚未正式公开回应这些言论。世界著名公共媒体上发表了针对电物理治疗手段应用的毫无根据的嘲讽言论以及对其从业者的不道德指控。这种言论暗示电物理治疗手段的干预是“神奇”疗法,那些将其纳入护理计划的从业者可能存在欺诈行为。这种抨击言论与美国物理治疗协会(APTA)的《物理治疗师实践指南4.0》、美国物理治疗教育认证委员会(CAPTE)的项目认证政策以及美国物理治疗师资格考试委员会(FSBPT)的国家执照考试形成了鲜明矛盾。本评论的目的是揭示这种言论的程度,并呼吁APTA、CAPTE和FSBPT组织以及物理治疗师采取行动,以制止这种言论。

相似文献

1
On Putting an End to the Backlash Against Electrophysical Agents.终结对电物理因子的抵制
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Oct 2;18(5):1230-1237. doi: 10.26603/001c.87813. eCollection 2023.
2
A national study of the availability and use of electrophysical agents by Australian physiotherapists.一项关于澳大利亚物理治疗师对电物理治疗手段的可获得性及使用情况的全国性研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2009 May;25(4):279-96. doi: 10.1080/09593980902782611.
3
Creating an interface between the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and physical therapist practice.构建国际功能、残疾和健康分类与物理治疗师实践之间的接口。
Phys Ther. 2010 Jul;90(7):1053-63. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090326. Epub 2010 May 6.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Observations and recommendations on the investigation of clinical decision-making and usage involving electrophysical agents.关于涉及电物理制剂的临床决策与使用调查的观察结果及建议
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2015 Oct 8;4:54. doi: 10.1186/s13584-015-0050-7. eCollection 2015.
6
Research Agenda for Physical Therapy From the American Physical Therapy Association.美国物理治疗协会的物理治疗研究议程。
Phys Ther. 2023 Oct 3;103(10). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad126.
7
Licensure portability: assuring access to quality care in physical therapy.执照可携带性:确保在物理治疗中获得优质护理。
Int J Telerehabil. 2014 Sep 3;6(1):25-7. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2014.6147. eCollection 2014 Spring.
8
Clinical Specialization and Adherence to Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Management: A Survey of US Physical Therapists.临床专业特长与遵循基于证据的实践指南治疗腰痛管理:对美国物理治疗师的调查。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 May;47(5):347-358. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.6561. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
9
Cultivating Competency in Cardiac Sonography: Aligning Entrustable Professional Activities With Industry Expectations.培养心脏超声检查能力:使可委托专业活动与行业期望保持一致。
Heart Lung Circ. 2024 Jul;33(7):1067-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.01.027. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
10
Benefits of EPAs at risk? The influence of the workplace environment on the uptake of EPAs in EPA-based curricula.EPA 的好处是否受到威胁?工作环境对 EPA 为基础课程中 EPA 采用的影响。
Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Aug;10(4):200-206. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00658-9. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis.机械牵引作为腰椎间盘突出症物理治疗的临床疗效:一项荟萃分析
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 21;2022:5670303. doi: 10.1155/2022/5670303. eCollection 2022.
2
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Ultrasound Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体外冲击波疗法与超声疗法治疗足底筋膜炎的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2022 Jan 2;14(1):e20871. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20871. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study).经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗成人急性和慢性疼痛的疗效和安全性:381 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析(meta-TENS 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 10;12(2):e051073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051073.
4
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Shows Superiority Over Injections for Pain Relief and Grip Strength Recovery in Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.体外冲击波疗法在缓解外侧肱骨上髁炎疼痛和握力恢复方面优于注射治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Jun;38(6):2018-2034.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.025. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Electrical microcurrent stimulation therapy for wound healing: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.电微电流刺激疗法治疗伤口愈合:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Tissue Viability. 2022 May;31(2):268-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
6
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Foot and Ankle Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体外冲击波疗法治疗足踝疾病的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2022 May-Jun;112(3). doi: 10.7547/18-191.
7
An Update on Narrowband Ultraviolet B Therapy for the Treatment of Skin Diseases.窄谱中波紫外线治疗皮肤病的最新进展
Cureus. 2021 Nov 1;13(11):e19182. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19182. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Wound Healing with Electrical Stimulation Technologies: A Review.电刺激技术促进伤口愈合:综述
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Nov 1;13(21):3790. doi: 10.3390/polym13213790.
9
Making the Case for Modalities: The Need for Critical Thinking in Practice.论证各种方式:实践中批判性思维的必要性。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Oct 1;16(5):28326. doi: 10.26603/001c.28326. eCollection 2021.
10
Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulation for Bone Fractures Healing: A Review.低强度脉冲超声刺激治疗骨折愈合:综述。
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Mar;41(3):547-563. doi: 10.1002/jum.15738. Epub 2021 May 5.