Williet Nicolas, Caillol Fabrice, Karsenti David, Abou-Ali Einas, Camus Marine, Belle Arthur, Chaput Ulriikka, Levy Jonathan, Ratone Jean-Philippe, Tournier Quentin, Grange Rémi, Le Roy Bertrand, Becq Aymeric, Phelip Jean-Marc
Hepatogastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Endosc Ultrasound. 2023 Jul-Aug;12(4):377-381. doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000024. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
Pancreatic cyst fluid level of glucose is a promising marker to identify mucinous from nonmucinous tumors, but the glucose assay has not yet been recommended. The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic performances of pancreatic cyst fluid level of glucose and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).
In this French multicenter study, data of consecutive patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cyst with intracyst glucose assay between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of glucose and corresponding sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), accuracy (Acc), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated and compared with those of CEA. The best threshold of glucose was identified using the Youden index.
Of the 121 patients identified, 81 had a definitive diagnosis (46 mucinous, 35 nonmucinous tumors) and were included for analysis. An intracystic glucose level <41.8 mg/dL allowed identification of mucinous tumors with better diagnostic performances (AUROC, 93.6%; 95% confidence interval, 87.2%-100%; Se, 95.3%; Sp, 91.2%; Acc, 93.5%; PPV, 93.2%; NPV, 93.9%) compared with CEA level >192 ng/mL (AUROC, 81.2%; 95% confidence interval, 71.3%-91.1%; Se, 41.7%; Sp, 96.9%; Acc, 67.6%; PPV, 93.8%; NPV, 59.6%) ( = 0.035). Combining values of glucose and CEA did not offer additional benefit in terms of diagnosis.
Our results confirm previously published data and support the use of pancreatic cyst fluid glucose for the identification of mucinous tumors when the definitive diagnosis remains uncertain.
胰腺囊肿液葡萄糖水平是鉴别黏液性肿瘤与非黏液性肿瘤的一个有前景的标志物,但葡萄糖检测尚未得到推荐。本研究的目的是比较胰腺囊肿液葡萄糖水平与癌胚抗原(CEA)的诊断性能。
在这项法国多中心研究中,回顾性分析了2018年至2022年间连续接受胰腺囊肿细针穿刺并进行囊内葡萄糖检测的患者数据。计算葡萄糖的受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)以及相应的敏感性(Se)、特异性(Sp)、准确性(Acc)、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),并与CEA的这些指标进行比较。使用约登指数确定葡萄糖的最佳阈值。
在确定的121例患者中,81例有明确诊断(46例黏液性肿瘤,35例非黏液性肿瘤)并纳入分析。囊内葡萄糖水平<41.8mg/dL用于鉴别黏液性肿瘤时,诊断性能更佳(AUROC为93.6%;95%置信区间为87.2% - 100%;Se为95.3%;Sp为91.2%;Acc为93.5%;PPV为93.2%;NPV为93.9%),而CEA水平>192ng/mL时(AUROC为81.2%;95%置信区间为71.3% - 91.1%;Se为41.7%;Sp为96.9%;Acc为67.6%;PPV为93.8%;NPV为59.6%)(P = 0.035)。联合葡萄糖和CEA的值在诊断方面未提供额外益处。
我们的结果证实了先前发表的数据,并支持在明确诊断仍不确定时,使用胰腺囊肿液葡萄糖来鉴别黏液性肿瘤。