Shields Ryan K, Kline Ellen G, Squires Kevin M, Van Tyne Daria, Doi Yohei
Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Center for Innovative Antimicrobial Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Oct 3;5(5):dlad107. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad107. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Cefiderocol demonstrates excellent activity against MDR ; however, the activity against isolates from patients previously treated with β-lactam agents is unknown. We aimed to determine the activity of cefiderocol against collected before and after treatment with traditional β-lactams and new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors.
Cefiderocol MICs were determined in triplicate in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and compared with β-lactam MICs tested by standard methods. All isolates underwent WGS analysis to identify mutations associated with resistance.
One hundred and seventy-eight isolates were evaluated; 48% (86/178) were non-susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or imipenem/relebactam. The cefiderocol MIC and MIC were 0.12 and 1 mg/L, respectively. Median cefiderocol MICs did not vary against isolates classified as MDR, XDR, or those non-susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or imipenem/relebactam when compared with non-MDR isolates. Against isolates collected from patients previously treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol MICs were increased 4-fold compared with baseline. Cross-resistance to cefiderocol was identified in 21% (3/14) of patients who developed treatment-emergent resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Overall, 6% (11/178) of isolates demonstrated cefiderocol MICs ≥2 mg/L, which were disproportionately collected from patients previously treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam (73%; 8/11). Isolates with reduced cefiderocol susceptibility harboured mutations in , -dependent receptors, the response regulator and .
Cefiderocol demonstrates excellent activity against isolates exposed to other novel β-lactam agents; however, some exceptions were identified. Cross-resistance between cefiderocol and ceftolozane/tazobactam was evident, but not with ceftazidime/avibactam or imipenem/relebactam. Reduced cefiderocol susceptibility was mediated by mutations in and -dependent receptors.
头孢地尔对多重耐药菌表现出优异的活性;然而,其对先前接受过β-内酰胺类药物治疗患者的分离菌株的活性尚不清楚。我们旨在确定头孢地尔对在使用传统β-内酰胺类药物和新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂治疗前后收集的分离菌株的活性。
在缺铁的阳离子调整穆勒-欣顿肉汤中对头孢地尔的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)进行三次测定,并与通过标准方法检测的β-内酰胺类药物的MIC进行比较。所有分离菌株均进行全基因组测序(WGS)分析以鉴定与耐药相关的突变。
共评估了178株分离菌株;48%(86/178)对头孢他啶/阿维巴坦、头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦和/或亚胺培南/瑞来巴坦不敏感。头孢地尔的MIC和MIC分别为0.12和1mg/L。与非多重耐药分离菌株相比,头孢地尔对分类为多重耐药、广泛耐药或对头孢他啶/阿维巴坦、头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦和/或亚胺培南/瑞来巴坦不敏感的分离菌株的MIC中位数没有变化。对于从先前接受过头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦治疗的患者中收集的分离菌株,与基线相比,头孢地尔的MIC增加了4倍。在对头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦产生治疗中出现的耐药性的患者中,21%(3/14)鉴定出对头孢地尔的交叉耐药。总体而言,6%(11/178)的分离菌株显示头孢地尔的MIC≥2mg/L,其中不成比例地从先前接受过头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦治疗的患者中收集(73%;8/11)。头孢地尔敏感性降低的分离菌株在铁依赖性受体、反应调节因子和中存在突变。
头孢地尔对暴露于其他新型β-内酰胺类药物的分离菌株表现出优异的活性;然而,也发现了一些例外情况。头孢地尔与头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦之间的交叉耐药明显,但与头孢他啶/阿维巴坦或亚胺培南/瑞来巴坦之间没有交叉耐药。头孢地尔敏感性降低是由铁依赖性受体和中的突变介导的。