Shin Dong Yeol, Moon Yoon Jae, Kim Jun Young, Kang Kyung-Tae
Digital Transformation R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH), Sangnok-gu, Ansan-si 15588, South Korea.
Micro/Nano System Department, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, South Korea.
Rev Sci Instrum. 2023 Oct 1;94(10). doi: 10.1063/5.0159472.
Inkjet printers have started to manufacture OLED/QLED pixel arrays for the display industry, and the precise measurement and control of ink droplet volume during the printing process has become important. We investigated the feasibility of Fraunhofer diffraction analysis as a volume measurement tool for fast-moving inkjet droplets. To confirm the basic idea, two Fraunhofer diffraction-based methods were used to calculate the wire diameters of well-known sized and steady-positioned metal wires. The first method was to curve-fit the whole measured diffraction intensity curve with the extensive Fraunhofer diffraction equation. The second one was to use the simple approximate diameter calculation equation with the measured position data of minimum diffraction intensity. The metal wire diameters calculated by the two methods showed less than 1.17% error. For the size measurement of fast-moving inkjet droplets, the first method showed 24.5 µm diameter and 7.7 pL volume, while the second method showed 25.4 µm diameter and 8.58 pL volume. We found that the second method was more suitable for real-time inkjet monitoring because its average computer calculation time was 33 ms, and the first method took an average of 34 ms, about 1000 times more CPU time. Hence, Fraunhofer diffraction analysis as an inkjet droplet volume measurement tool was feasible with a good balance of measurement time and measurement accuracy.
喷墨打印机已开始为显示行业制造有机发光二极管/量子点发光二极管像素阵列,并且在打印过程中对墨滴体积进行精确测量和控制变得至关重要。我们研究了将夫琅禾费衍射分析作为快速移动喷墨墨滴体积测量工具的可行性。为了验证基本思路,我们使用了两种基于夫琅禾费衍射的方法来计算已知尺寸且位置固定的金属丝的线径。第一种方法是用广义夫琅禾费衍射方程对整个测量的衍射强度曲线进行曲线拟合。第二种方法是使用简单的近似直径计算公式,并结合最小衍射强度的测量位置数据。通过这两种方法计算出的金属丝线径误差小于1.17%。对于快速移动的喷墨墨滴尺寸测量,第一种方法测得的直径为24.5 µm,体积为7.7皮升,而第二种方法测得的直径为25.4 µm,体积为8.58皮升。我们发现第二种方法更适合实时喷墨监测,因为其平均计算机计算时间为33毫秒,而第一种方法平均需要34毫秒,CPU时间约为前者的1000倍。因此,夫琅禾费衍射分析作为一种喷墨墨滴体积测量工具在测量时间和测量精度之间取得了良好平衡,是可行的。