Botulinum Toxin for the Management of Pelvic Floor Tension Myalgia and Persistent Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature on use of botulinum toxin to treat pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain.

DATA SOURCES

The ClinicalTrials.gov , PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to November 2022 by two independent assessors (B.L.K. and F.G.L.). Identified studies were screened by title and abstract and included after full-text review. Data extraction was subsequently performed and recorded in Microsoft Excel.

METHODS

This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines after registration in PROSPERO (CRD42022289132). All randomized studies, prospective studies with more than five participants, and retrospective studies with more than 10 participants published in English or French and assessing the use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain in women were included. Meta-analyses were performed on randomized data.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Of 4,722 articles identified, 24 satisfied inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials totaling 329 participants demonstrated no differences in patient- and clinician-reported outcome measures, including pain, dyspareunia, sexual function, and vaginal manometry. Mean duration of follow-up was 6 months. A qualitative analysis of 14 prospective and four retrospective studies including 804 participants is supportive of botulinum toxin; however, the quality of data is low, and there is marked heterogeneity between studies.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analyses of randomized data do not support the use of botulinum toxin to treat pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain. Failure of these data to confirm the findings of nonrandomized prospective studies that suggest a treatment benefit may be attributable to the absence of placebo control and confounding outcomes obtained from an active comparator group. Further randomized controlled trials with true placebo are strongly recommended.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42022289132.