Suppr超能文献

采用电子医疗的极低能量饮食干预在 2 型糖尿病和肥胖患者中的成本效益:一项随机对照非劣效性试验(E-diet 试验)的研究方案。

The (cost) effectiveness of a very low-energy diet intervention with the use of eHealth in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (E-diet trial).

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Dietetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetology and Division of Vascular Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Oct 5;24(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07620-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite preventive measures, the number of people with type 2 diabetes and obesity is increasing. Obesity increases morbidity and mortality in people with type 2 diabetes, making weight loss a cornerstone of treatment. We previously developed a very low energy diet (VLED) intervention that effectively reduced weight in people with type 2 diabetes in the long term. However, this intervention requires considerable time and manpower, which reduces the number of people who can benefit from it. eHealth offers more efficient solutions but has proven to be less effective than face-to-face interventions. Therefore, we want to investigate whether a blended version of our VLED intervention (in which face-to-face contact is partly replaced by an eHealth (mobile) application (E-VLED)) would be more cost-effective than the current face-to-face intervention.

METHODS

We will conduct a randomised, controlled trial with non-inferiority design in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m), aged 18-75 years. The control group will receive the usual care VLED intervention, while the intervention group will receive the E-VLED intervention for 1 year, where face-to-face contact will be partly replaced by an eHealth (mobile) application. The main study endpoint is the difference in weight (% change) between the control and intervention group after 1 year, plus the difference between the total costs (euro) of the treatment in the control and intervention groups. The secondary aims are to investigate the effectiveness of the E-VLED diet intervention regarding cardiovascular risk factors, quality of life, patient satisfaction, compliance, and to study whether there is a difference in effectiveness in pre-specified subgroups. General linear models for repeated measurements will be applied for the statistical analysis of the data.

DISCUSSION

We hypothesise that the E-VLED intervention will be equally effective compared to the usual care VLED but lower in costs due to less time invested by the dietician. This will enable to help more people with type 2 diabetes and obesity to effectively lose weight and improve their health-related quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register, NL7832, registered on 26 June 2019.

摘要

背景

尽管采取了预防措施,2 型糖尿病和肥胖患者的人数仍在增加。肥胖增加了 2 型糖尿病患者的发病率和死亡率,使体重减轻成为治疗的基石。我们之前开发了一种非常低能量饮食(VLED)干预措施,该措施在长期内有效地减轻了 2 型糖尿病患者的体重。然而,这种干预措施需要相当多的时间和人力,这减少了可以从中受益的人数。电子健康提供了更有效的解决方案,但已被证明不如面对面干预有效。因此,我们想研究我们的 VLED 干预措施的混合版本(其中面对面接触部分由电子健康(移动)应用程序(E-VLED)代替)是否比当前的面对面干预更具成本效益。

方法

我们将在 2 型糖尿病和肥胖症(BMI>30kg/m)患者中进行一项随机对照试验,设计为非劣效性试验,年龄为 18-75 岁。对照组将接受常规护理 VLED 干预,而干预组将接受 E-VLED 干预 1 年,其中面对面接触将部分由电子健康(移动)应用程序代替。主要研究终点是对照组和干预组在 1 年后体重的差异(%变化),以及对照组和干预组治疗总成本(欧元)之间的差异。次要目的是调查 E-VLED 饮食干预对心血管风险因素、生活质量、患者满意度、依从性的有效性,并研究在预定亚组中是否存在有效性差异。将应用重复测量的一般线性模型进行数据分析。

讨论

我们假设 E-VLED 干预与常规护理 VLED 同样有效,但由于营养师投入的时间减少,成本更低。这将使更多的 2 型糖尿病和肥胖患者能够有效地减轻体重并改善他们的健康相关生活质量。

试验注册

荷兰试验登记处,NL7832,于 2019 年 6 月 26 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4ab/10557281/2ec54bb1b794/13063_2023_7620_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验