• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贸易摩擦对股票市场稳定性的影响:来自中国的证据。

The influence of trade friction on the stability of stock market: Evidence from China.

作者信息

Guo Jianna, Liu Lu, Tang Yi

机构信息

School of International Economics and Trade, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, No. 995 Shangchuan Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China.

School of Statistics and Mathematics, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, No. 995 Shangchuan Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Sep 30;9(10):e20446. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20446. eCollection 2023 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20446
PMID:37800071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10550516/
Abstract

Stock markets are vulnerable to systemic events. This study analyzes the impact of multiple macro-characteristic events, such as trade friction, on China's stock markets. By leveraging a new event study and quantile regression method, we find that trade friction events significantly affect the stability of the stock market from six trading days in advance to five trading days after the event. The expected effects of trade friction events significantly influence the high quantile of stock market returns before these events. The low quantile of returns is affected as the news confirmation time approaches. Friction events have an impact before, and on the day of the event, and affect the stability of the stock market by influencing the low-quantile group, whereas mitigation events affect the stability of the stock market for a longer time by influencing the high-quantile group. Regulators and investors should pay attention to the impact of trade friction on the stock market. Regulators should also pay proper attention to the direction of public opinion on positive and negative news to maintain stock market stability.

摘要

股票市场容易受到系统性事件的影响。本研究分析了贸易摩擦等多种宏观特征事件对中国股票市场的影响。通过运用一种新的事件研究和分位数回归方法,我们发现贸易摩擦事件从事件发生前六个交易日到事件发生后五个交易日都会显著影响股票市场的稳定性。贸易摩擦事件的预期影响在这些事件发生前会显著影响股票市场回报的高分位数。随着消息确认时间临近,回报的低分位数会受到影响。摩擦事件在事件发生前和当天都会产生影响,并通过影响低分位数群体来影响股票市场的稳定性,而缓解事件则通过影响高分位数群体在更长时间内影响股票市场的稳定性。监管机构和投资者应关注贸易摩擦对股票市场的影响。监管机构还应适当关注关于正面和负面消息的舆论导向,以维持股票市场的稳定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90e/10550516/04dca7a1159c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90e/10550516/ff5994be7ad1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90e/10550516/8be4336f7669/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90e/10550516/04dca7a1159c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90e/10550516/ff5994be7ad1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90e/10550516/8be4336f7669/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90e/10550516/04dca7a1159c/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of trade friction on the stability of stock market: Evidence from China.贸易摩擦对股票市场稳定性的影响:来自中国的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 30;9(10):e20446. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20446. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Impact of COVID-19 and economic policy uncertainty on China's stock market returns: evidence from quantile-on-quantile and causality-in-quantiles approaches.新冠疫情与经济政策不确定性对中国股市收益的影响:来自分位数-分位数和因果关系-分位数方法的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(5):12596-12607. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22680-y. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
3
Does US monetary policy uncertainty affect returns of Asian Developed, emerging, and frontier equity markets? Empirical evidence by using the quantile-on-quantile approach.美国货币政策不确定性是否会影响亚洲发达、新兴和前沿股票市场的回报?基于分位数对分位数方法的实证证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 13;10(12):e32962. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32962. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
4
Nonlinear dependence between China's carbon market and stock market: new evidence from quantile coherency and causality-in-quantiles.中国碳市场与股票市场之间的非线性关系:分位数一致性和分位数因果关系的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(30):46064-46076. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19179-x. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
5
Study on the linkage between macro policy and market effectiveness in China's stock market: Based on run test of China's stock market index.中国股票市场宏观政策与市场有效性的关联研究:基于中国股票市场指数的游程检验。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 27;18(2):e0281670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281670. eCollection 2023.
6
Does non-fundamental news related to COVID-19 matter for stock returns? Evidence from Shanghai stock market.与新冠疫情相关的非基本面新闻对股票回报有影响吗?来自上海股票市场的证据。
Econ Model. 2021 Jun;99:105484. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
7
Media coverage and stock market returns: Evidence from China Pakistan economic corridor (CPEC).媒体报道与股票市场回报:来自中巴经济走廊(CPEC)的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 1;9(3):e14204. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14204. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
The effect of Malaysia general election on stock market returns.马来西亚大选对股票市场回报的影响。
Springerplus. 2016 Nov 14;5(1):1975. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3648-5. eCollection 2016.
9
The dynamics of carbon on green energy equity investment: quantile-on-quantile and quantile coherency approaches.绿色能源股权投资中碳的动态:分位数-分位数和分位数一致性方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(4):5912-5922. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15647-y. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
10
How Air Quality Affect Health Industry Stock Returns: New Evidence From the Quantile-on-Quantile Regression.空气质量如何影响健康产业股票收益:分位数-分位数回归的新证据。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;9:789510. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.789510. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Asymmetric impacts of geopolitical risk on stock markets: A comparative analysis of the E7 and G7 equities during the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.地缘政治风险对股票市场的非对称影响:俄乌冲突期间E7和G7股票的比较分析
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 11;9(2):e13626. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13626. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Financial immunity of companies from Indonesian and Shanghai stock exchange during the US-China trade war.美中贸易战期间印尼证券交易所和上海证券交易所上市公司的财务豁免权。 (注:原英文表述不太准确,推测可能想表达的是上市公司在相关证券交易所的财务状况不受影响之类的意思,翻译尽量贴近原英文)
Heliyon. 2022 Jan 25;8(2):e08832. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08832. eCollection 2022 Feb.