Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 May;65(5):694-709. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13897. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
Multicomponent interventions are needed to address the various co-occurring risks that compromise early child nutrition and development. We compared the independent and combined effects of engaging fathers and bundling parenting components into a nutrition intervention on early child development (ECD) and parenting outcomes.
We conducted a 2×2 factorial cluster-randomized controlled trial across 80 villages in Mara Region, Tanzania, also known as EFFECTS (Engaging Fathers for Effective Child Nutrition and Development in Tanzania; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03759821). Households with children under 18 months of age residing with their mother and father were enrolled. Villages were randomly assigned to one of five groups: a nutrition intervention for mothers, a nutrition intervention for couples, a bundled nutrition and parenting intervention for mothers, a bundled intervention for couples, and a standard-of-care control. Interventions were delivered by trained community health workers through peer groups and home visits over 12 months. Mothers, fathers, and children were assessed at baseline, midline, and endline or postintervention. We used a difference-in-difference approach with intention-to-treat analysis to estimate intervention effects on ECD (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition) and maternal and paternal parenting and psychosocial well-being.
Between October 29, 2018, and May 24, 2019, 960 households were enrolled (n = 192 per arm). Compared to nutrition interventions, bundled interventions improved children's cognitive (β = .18 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.36]) and receptive language development (β = .23 [0.04, 0.41]). There were no differences between interventions for other ECD domains. Compared to nutrition interventions, bundled interventions achieved additional benefits on maternal stimulation (β = .21 [0.04, 0.38]) and availability of home learning materials (β = .25 [0.07-0.43]) and reduced paternal parenting distress (β = -.34 [-0.55, -0.12]). Compared to interventions with mothers only, interventions that engaged fathers improved paternal stimulation (β = .45 [0.27, 0.63]).
Jointly bundling parenting components into nutrition interventions while also engaging both mothers and fathers is most effective for improving maternal and paternal parenting and ECD outcomes.
需要采取多种干预措施来解决各种同时存在的风险,这些风险会影响儿童早期的营养和发育。我们比较了让父亲参与和将育儿内容纳入营养干预这两种措施对儿童早期发展(ECD)和育儿结果的独立和综合影响。
我们在坦桑尼亚马拉地区的 80 个村庄进行了一项 2×2 析因群组随机对照试验,称为 EFFECTS(坦桑尼亚让父亲参与有效儿童营养和发展;ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03759821)。将与父母同住且年龄在 18 个月以下的儿童家庭纳入研究。村庄被随机分配到以下五组中的一组:母亲营养干预组、夫妻营养干预组、母亲综合营养和育儿干预组、夫妻综合干预组和标准护理对照组。干预措施由经过培训的社区卫生工作者通过同伴小组和家访在 12 个月内提供。在基线、中期和结束或干预后对母亲、父亲和儿童进行评估。我们采用意向治疗分析的差值法估计 ECD(贝利婴幼儿发育量表,第三版)以及母亲和父亲的育儿和心理社会健康方面的干预效果。
2018 年 10 月 29 日至 2019 年 5 月 24 日期间,共有 960 个家庭入组(每组 192 个家庭)。与营养干预相比,综合干预改善了儿童的认知(β=0.18[95%CI:0.01,0.36])和接受性语言发展(β=0.23[0.04,0.41])。在其他 ECD 领域,干预之间没有差异。与营养干预相比,综合干预在母亲刺激(β=0.21[0.04,0.38])和家庭学习材料的可用性(β=0.25[0.07-0.43])方面取得了额外的收益,并减少了父亲的育儿压力(β=-0.34[-0.55,-0.12])。与仅针对母亲的干预相比,让父亲参与的干预措施提高了父亲的刺激(β=0.45[0.27,0.63])。
将育儿内容综合纳入营养干预措施,并同时让母亲和父亲参与,这对改善母亲和父亲的育儿和 ECD 结果最有效。