Mo Jiajie, Guo Zhihao, Wang Xiu, Zhang Jianguo, Hu Wenhan, Shao Xiaoqiu, Sang Lin, Zheng Zhong, Zhang Chao, Zhang Kai
Departments of Neurosurgery.
Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University.
Int J Surg. 2024 Jan 1;110(1):306-314. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000811.
Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) and traditional open surgery (OS) are effective and safe options for patients with drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (DR-mTLE). However, their superiority in seizure control and preservation of functional abilities remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of MRgLITT and OS.
This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with DR-mTLE who underwent MRgLITT or OS at three centres between 2015 and 2023. The data on patient demographics, presurgical non-invasive evaluation, stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) implantation, memory alteration, and seizure outcomes were collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted for the comparison of seizure control and functional preservation between two surgical approaches.
Of the 244 individuals who met the study criteria, 33 underwent MRgLITT and 211 OS. The median (interquartile range) age at seizure onset was 22.0 (13.0) and 12.3 (10.0) years in the MRgLITT and OS groups, respectively. The first PSM, based on demographic and non-invasive information, resulted in 26 matched pairs for the primary analysis. There were no significant differences in memory preservation ( P = 0.95) or surgical outcomes ( P = 0.96) between the groups. The second PSM, based on demographics and SEEG implantation, yielded 32 matched pairs for the sensitivity analysis, showing similar results. Subset analysis of early and late MRgLITT cases revealed no statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients with memory decline ( P = 0.42) or seizure control ( P = 1.00). Patients who underwent SEEG implantation were 96% less likely to achieve seizure freedom after MRgLITT ( P = 0.02).
Minimally invasive MRgLITT is associated with memory preservation and seizure control, similar to traditional OS. MRgLITT is effective and safe for DR-mTLE and is relevant for future prospective randomized trials on dominant-side mTLE, providing practical implications for guiding neurosurgeons in the selection of surgical approaches.
磁共振引导激光间质热疗(MRgLITT)和传统开放手术(OS)对于耐药性内侧颞叶癫痫(DR-mTLE)患者来说都是有效且安全的选择。然而,它们在控制癫痫发作和保留功能能力方面的优越性仍不明确。本研究旨在比较MRgLITT和OS的手术效果。
这项多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2015年至2023年间在三个中心接受MRgLITT或OS治疗的DR-mTLE患者。收集了患者人口统计学、术前无创评估、立体定向脑电图(SEEG)植入、记忆改变和癫痫发作结果的数据。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析来比较两种手术方法在癫痫控制和功能保留方面的差异。
在符合研究标准的244例个体中,33例接受了MRgLITT,211例接受了OS。MRgLITT组和OS组癫痫发作开始的中位(四分位间距)年龄分别为22.0(13.0)岁和12.3(10.0)岁。基于人口统计学和无创信息的首次PSM分析产生了26对匹配对用于初步分析。两组在记忆保留(P = 0.95)或手术结果(P = 0.96)方面无显著差异。基于人口统计学和SEEG植入的第二次PSM分析产生了32对匹配对用于敏感性分析,结果相似。对早期和晚期MRgLITT病例的亚组分析显示,记忆减退患者比例(P = 0.42)或癫痫控制(P = 1.00)方面无统计学显著差异。接受SEEG植入的患者在MRgLITT后实现无癫痫发作的可能性降低了96%(P = 0.02)。
与传统开放手术类似,微创MRgLITT与记忆保留和癫痫控制相关。MRgLITT对DR-mTLE有效且安全,对未来关于优势侧mTLE的前瞻性随机试验具有重要意义,为指导神经外科医生选择手术方法提供了实际参考。