• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本真实世界转移性胆道癌患者的治疗结局:日本胆道癌研究组真实世界数据项目 04(TREAD 04)。

Real-world treatment outcomes of metastatic biliary tract cancer patients in Japan: the Tokushukai REAl-world data project 04 (TREAD 04).

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Shonankamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan.

Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 7;54(1):70-80. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyad133.

DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyad133
PMID:37801431
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate temporal trends in treatment patterns and prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

From the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project, we identified 945 patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer treated with gemcitabine, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, gemcitabine plus tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil or gemcitabine plus cisplatin and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil between April 2010 and March 2022. Stratified/conventional Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between overall survival and patient- and tumour-related factors, study period, hospital volume, hospital type and first-line chemotherapy regimen. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores, overall survival was also compared between monotherapy and combination therapy groups.

RESULTS

We enrolled 366 patients (199 men; median age, 72 years). Over a median follow-up of 5.2 months, the median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval 6.2-9.0), and the median time to treatment failure was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval 3.1-4.5). Median overall survival and time to treatment failure for gemcitabine/tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil/gemcitabine plus cisplatin/gemcitabine plus tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil/gemcitabine plus cisplatin and tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil regimen were 6.2/6.6/7.9/16.2/15.1 and 2.8/3.4/4.1/15.3/7.4 months, respectively. Primary disease site, previous surgery, previous endoscopic procedures and hospital type were identified as significant prognostic factors. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis demonstrated that combination therapy had a significantly better prognosis than monotherapy (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.88, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world data analysis showed that standard care for metastatic biliary tract cancer is widely used in hospitals throughout Japan and verified the survival benefits of combination therapy over monotherapy observed in prior clinical trials.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

UMIN000050590 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

摘要

目的

研究转移性胆道癌患者整体生存的治疗模式和预后因素的时间趋势。

方法

我们从 Tokushukai REAl-world Data 项目中确定了 945 名转移性胆道癌患者,他们接受了吉西他滨、替加氟/替加氟/奥替拉西/吉西他滨、吉西他滨联合顺铂、吉西他滨联合替加氟/替加氟/奥替拉西或吉西他滨联合顺铂和替加氟/替加氟/奥替拉西治疗。采用分层/常规 Cox 回归分析,研究患者和肿瘤相关因素、研究期间、医院容量、医院类型和一线化疗方案与总生存之间的关系。采用倾向评分逆概率治疗加权法比较单药治疗组和联合治疗组的总生存率。

结果

共纳入 366 名患者(199 名男性;中位年龄 72 岁)。中位随访 5.2 个月后,中位总生存期为 7.0 个月(95%置信区间 6.2-9.0),中位治疗失败时间为 3.5 个月(95%置信区间 3.1-4.5)。吉西他滨/替加氟-替加氟-奥替拉西/吉西他滨联合顺铂/吉西他滨联合替加氟-替加氟-奥替拉西/吉西他滨联合顺铂和替加氟-替加氟-奥替拉西方案的中位总生存期和治疗失败时间分别为 6.2/6.6/7.9/16.2/15.1 和 2.8/3.4/4.1/15.3/7.4 个月。原发疾病部位、既往手术、既往内镜治疗和医院类型是显著的预后因素。逆概率治疗加权分析表明,联合治疗的预后明显优于单药治疗(风险比 0.61,95%置信区间 0.43-0.88,P=0.006)。

结论

我们的真实世界数据分析表明,转移性胆道癌的标准治疗在日本各地的医院中得到了广泛应用,并验证了先前临床试验中观察到的联合治疗比单药治疗更具生存优势。

临床试验注册号

UMIN000050590(http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm)。

相似文献

1
Real-world treatment outcomes of metastatic biliary tract cancer patients in Japan: the Tokushukai REAl-world data project 04 (TREAD 04).日本真实世界转移性胆道癌患者的治疗结局:日本胆道癌研究组真实世界数据项目 04(TREAD 04)。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 7;54(1):70-80. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyad133.
2
Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas.基于吉西他滨的晚期胆管癌化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 6;4(4):CD011746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011746.pub2.
3
Real‑world treatment outcomes among patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan: The Tokushukai real‑world data project.日本转移性胰腺癌患者的真实世界治疗结局:德洲会真实世界数据项目
Mol Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 25;19(6):98. doi: 10.3892/mco.2023.2694. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial.吉西他滨联合 S-1 对比吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期/复发性胆道癌:FUGA-BT(JCOG1113)随机 III 期临床试验。
Ann Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;30(12):1950-1958. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz402.
5
Single-institution experience with gemcitabine-cisplatin combination therapy as a second-line treatment for patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer after failure of gemcitabine-S-1 combination therapy: a prospective feasibility study.单中心经验:吉西他滨联合顺铂方案作为吉西他滨联合替吉奥方案二线治疗失败的不可切除胆道癌患者的治疗选择:一项前瞻性可行性研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 May;81(5):949-955. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3566-z. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
Randomized Phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG1113, FUGA-BT).吉西他滨联合S-1对比吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期胆管癌的随机III期研究:日本临床肿瘤学会研究(JCOG1113,FUGA-BT)
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;46(4):385-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv213. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
7
Efficacy and safety of S-1 following gemcitabine with cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer.吉西他滨联合顺铂化疗后序贯替吉奥胶囊治疗晚期胆道癌的有效性和安全性。
Invest New Drugs. 2021 Oct;39(5):1399-1404. doi: 10.1007/s10637-021-01098-2. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
8
Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus S-1 in advanced biliary tract cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0805).吉西他滨联合 S-1 对比 S-1 治疗晚期胆道癌的随机 II 期研究:日本临床肿瘤学组研究(JCOG0805)
Cancer Sci. 2013 Sep;104(9):1211-6. doi: 10.1111/cas.12218. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
9
Phase II study of fixed dose-rate gemcitabine plus S-1 as a second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer.固定剂量率吉西他滨联合S-1作为晚期胆管癌二线治疗的II期研究
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Dec;80(6):1189-1196. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3461-z. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
10
Nivolumab alone or in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine in Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer: a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 1 study.尼伏鲁单抗单药治疗或联合顺铂和吉西他滨治疗不可切除或复发性胆道癌的日本患者:一项非随机、多中心、开放标签、1 期研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;4(8):611-621. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30086-X. Epub 2019 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer treated with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)对接受吉西他滨、顺铂和度伐利尤单抗治疗的不可切除胆管癌患者的预后影响
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03834-x.
2
Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer in China and the US.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗作为中国和美国晚期胆管癌一线治疗方案的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 14;15:1393559. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1393559. eCollection 2024.