Suppr超能文献

血管内低渗性造影剂的评估

Evaluation of intravascular low-osmolality contrast agents.

作者信息

Swanson D P, Thrall J H, Shetty P C

出版信息

Clin Pharm. 1986 Nov;5(11):877-91.

PMID:3780159
Abstract

The chemistry of low-osmolality contrast agents is reviewed, the effects of these agents on vascular and organ physiology are compared with the effects of conventional ionic contrast media, and guidelines for intravascular use of the low-osmolality agents in selected high-risk patients are presented. Three low-osmolality contrast agents, the nonionic media iohexol (Omnipaque, Winthrop-Breon) and iopamidol (Isovue, Squibb) and the dimeric medium ioxaglate meglumine-sodium (Hexabrix, Mallinckrodt) have recently been introduced into the contrast-media market. Compared with conventional ionic contrast media, these new agents demonstrate approximately one third of the osmolality per given iodine concentration (degree of roentgenographic opacification). Therefore, the risks of hyperosmolarity-induced reactions to contrast media are lower with the new agents. The low-osmolality agents may be associated with a reduced incidence of contrast-media-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Because of their lower osmolality, these agents produce less vessel dilation, vascular endothelial damage, and associated pain and discomfort than equi-iodine concentrations of the conventional ionic media. They also demonstrate a reduction in the incidence and severity of contrast-media-induced renal vasoconstriction and proteinuria, hemodynamic alterations, negative chronotropic effects, depression of myocardial contractility, and neurotoxicity in the presence of an altered blood-brain barrier. These low-osmolality agents produce fewer undesirable physiological effects than conventional contrast agents, but the cost of the new products can be more than 10 times as great. Therefore, the new products should be used selectively in patients known to be at increased risk for reactions to intravascular contrast media. A scoring system was developed to permit rapid recognition of documented single or multiple risk factors and subsequent determination of whether to administer a low-osmolality agent.

摘要

本文综述了低渗性造影剂的化学性质,比较了这些造影剂与传统离子型造影剂对血管和器官生理功能的影响,并给出了在特定高危患者中血管内使用低渗性造影剂的指南。三种低渗性造影剂,即非离子型造影剂碘海醇(欧乃派克,温思罗普-布瑞昂公司)和碘帕醇(碘维显,施贵宝公司)以及二聚体造影剂碘克沙葡甲胺-钠(六醇双酸,马林克罗特公司)最近已进入造影剂市场。与传统离子型造影剂相比,这些新型造影剂在给定碘浓度(X线造影显影程度)下的渗透压约为其三分之一。因此,新型造影剂因高渗引起的造影剂反应风险较低。低渗性造影剂可能会降低造影剂诱发的过敏反应发生率。由于其较低的渗透压,与等碘浓度的传统离子型造影剂相比,这些造影剂引起的血管扩张、血管内皮损伤以及相关疼痛和不适较少。在血脑屏障改变的情况下,它们还显示出造影剂诱发的肾血管收缩和蛋白尿、血流动力学改变、负性变时作用、心肌收缩力抑制以及神经毒性的发生率和严重程度降低。这些低渗性造影剂产生的不良生理效应比传统造影剂少,但新产品的成本可能高出10倍以上。因此,应在已知血管内造影剂反应风险增加的患者中选择性使用新产品。开发了一种评分系统,以便快速识别已记录的单一或多个风险因素,并随后确定是否给予低渗性造影剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验