Huang Ping, Qiu Yuwei, Xu Ting, Sun Xiaoqiong, Lu Zhixing, Zhang Yunyun, Yu Jiangli, Wu Jingxiang, Su Diansan, Huang Zhenling
Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Clin Anesth. 2023 Dec;91:111274. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111274. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
Videolaryngoscopes are widely used to visualize difficult airways. Our aim was to compare the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscopes for double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation in patients with difficult airways.
A multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Three comprehensive tertiary, high-volume hospitals from 5 December 2020 to 4 November 2021.
We included 348 adult patients with anticipated difficult airways who underwent elective thoracic surgery.
Patients were randomized into two groups: GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade. Following anesthesia induction, DLT intubation was performed using different videolaryngoscopes.
The primary outcome was the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation. All other results were recorded as secondary outcomes.
No significant differences were observed in the first-pass success rate of DLT intubation between the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade (86.21% and 89.66%, respectively; P = 0.323). However, compared with the GlideScope, the C-MAC D-blade provided a lower Cormack-Lehane grade (P < 0.001), lower rates of external laryngeal pressure (48 vs. 15, P < 0.001), and postprocedure sore throat (26 vs. 8, P < 0.001). The numerical rating score for difficulty of videolaryngoscope insertion into the oral cavity, delivery to the glottis, and intubation into the main bronchus were significantly lower when using the C-MAC D-blade (P < 0.001). Moreover, the duration of DLT intubation was shorter in the C-MAC D-blade group (81 s [70-97 s] vs. 95 s [78-115 s], P < 0.001). In each group, two patients underwent fiberoptic intubation after three attempts with a videolaryngoscope failed.
In patients with difficult airways, the GlideScope and C-MAC D-blade provided a similar success rate on the first DLT intubation attempt; however, the C-MAC D-blade offers a better glottic view, easier and faster intubation, and lower incidence of sore throat.
视频喉镜广泛用于观察困难气道。我们的目的是比较GlideScope和C-MAC D型叶片视频喉镜在困难气道患者中进行双腔气管导管(DLT)插管的效果。
一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。
2020年12月5日至2021年11月4日期间的三家综合性三级、大容量医院。
我们纳入了348例预计有困难气道且接受择期胸外科手术的成年患者。
患者被随机分为两组:GlideScope组和C-MAC D型叶片组。麻醉诱导后,使用不同的视频喉镜进行DLT插管。
主要结局是DLT插管的首次成功率。所有其他结果均记录为次要结局。
GlideScope组和C-MAC D型叶片组DLT插管的首次成功率无显著差异(分别为86. .21%和89.66%;P = 0.323)。然而,与GlideScope相比,C-MAC D型叶片喉镜的Cormack-Lehane分级更低(P < 0.001),外部喉压发生率更低(48例 vs. 15例,P < 0.001),术后咽痛发生率更低(26例 vs. 8例,P < 0.001)。使用C-MAC D型叶片喉镜时,视频喉镜插入口腔、送达声门和插入主支气管的困难程度数字评分显著更低(P < 0.001)。此外,C-MAC D型叶片组的DLT插管持续时间更短(81秒[70 - 97秒] vs. 95秒[78 - 115秒],P < .001)。每组中有两名患者在视频喉镜三次尝试失败后接受了纤维支气管镜插管。
在困难气道患者中,GlideScope和C-MAC D型叶片喉镜在首次DLT插管尝试中的成功率相似;然而,C-MAC D型叶片喉镜能提供更好的声门视野,插管更容易、更快,咽痛发生率更低。