• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

透析依赖和非依赖患者慢性肢体威胁性缺血中旁路手术与血管内治疗的肢体结局比较。

Comparison of limb outcomes between bypass surgery and endovascular therapy in dialysis-dependent and -independent patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Saiseikai Yahata General Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2024 Feb;79(2):316-322.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.09.035. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2023.09.035
PMID:37802402
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine limb salvage (LS) and wound healing in dialysis-dependent and -independent patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) after infrainguinal bypass surgery or endovascular therapy (EVT).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the multi-center data of patients who underwent infrainguinal revascularization for CLTI with Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage 2 to 4 between 2015 and 2020. The primary endpoint was LS. The secondary endpoint included wound healing, amputation-free survival (AFS), periprocedural complications, and 2-year survival. Comparison of these outcomes were made after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

We analyzed 252 dialysis-dependent (318 limbs) and 305 dialysis-independent (354 limbs) patients. Propensity score matching extracted 202 pairs with no significant differences in characteristics. The LS rate in bypass surgery was better than that in EVT in dialysis-dependent patients (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the LS rates between bypass surgery and EVT in dialysis-independent patients (P = .168). The wound healing rate of bypass surgery was better than that of EVT both dialysis-dependent and -independent patients with CLTI. The AFS rate of bypass surgery was better than that of EVT in dialysis-dependent patients (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the AFS rates between bypass surgery and EVT in dialysis-independent patients (P = .099). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo ≥ IV and V between bypass surgery and EVT in dialysis-dependent and -independent patients. Age ≥75 years, serum albumin levels <3.5 g/dL, and non-ambulatory status were risk factors for 2-year mortality in dialysis-dependent patients. The 2-year survival rates in dialysis-dependent patients with risk factors of 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 82.5%, 67.1%, 49.5%, and 10.2%, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

For LS and wound healing, bypass surgery was preferred for revascularization in dialysis-dependent patients with WIfI stage 2 to 4. Although dialysis dependency was one of the risk factors for 2-year mortality, dialysis-dependent patients, who have 0 to 1 risk factors, may benefit from bypass surgery, as 2-year survival of >50% is expected.

摘要

目的

探讨血透依赖和非依赖患者慢性肢体严重缺血(CLTI)下肢旁路手术或血管腔内治疗(EVT)后保肢(LS)和伤口愈合情况。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2020 年间接受下肢血运重建治疗 WIfI 2 至 4 期 CLTI 的患者的多中心数据。主要终点为 LS。次要终点包括伤口愈合、无截肢生存率(AFS)、围手术期并发症和 2 年生存率。在倾向评分匹配后比较这些结果。

结果

我们分析了 252 例血透依赖(318 条肢体)和 305 例非血透依赖(354 条肢体)患者。倾向评分匹配提取了 202 对特征无显著差异的患者。血透依赖患者旁路手术的 LS 率优于 EVT(P<0.001)。非血透依赖患者旁路手术和 EVT 的 LS 率无显著差异(P=0.168)。旁路手术的伤口愈合率优于 EVT 在血透依赖和非血透依赖的 CLTI 患者中。旁路手术的 AFS 率优于 EVT 在血透依赖患者(P<0.001)。非血透依赖患者旁路手术和 EVT 的 AFS 率无显著差异(P=0.099)。血透依赖和非血透依赖患者旁路手术和 EVT 的 Clavien-Dindo≥IV 和 V 并发症发生率无显著差异。年龄≥75 岁、血清白蛋白水平<3.5g/dL 和非活动状态是血透依赖患者 2 年死亡率的危险因素。有 0、1、2 和 3 个危险因素的血透依赖患者 2 年生存率分别为 82.5%、67.1%、49.5%和 10.2%(P<0.001)。

结论

对于 WIfI 2 至 4 期的血透依赖患者,LS 和伤口愈合,旁路手术是血运重建的首选。尽管透析依赖是 2 年死亡率的危险因素之一,但有 0 至 1 个危险因素的透析依赖患者可能从旁路手术中获益,因为预计 2 年生存率>50%。

相似文献

1
Comparison of limb outcomes between bypass surgery and endovascular therapy in dialysis-dependent and -independent patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.透析依赖和非依赖患者慢性肢体威胁性缺血中旁路手术与血管内治疗的肢体结局比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Feb;79(2):316-322.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.09.035. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Treatment outcomes between bypass surgery and endovascular therapy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia classified as bypass-preferred category based on Global Vascular Guidelines.基于全球血管指南分类为旁路首选类别的慢性肢体缺血威胁性患者中旁路手术与血管内治疗的治疗结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Aug;78(2):475-482.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
Infra-inguinal bypass surgery vs endovascular revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in average- and high-risk patients.下肢动脉旁路手术与血管腔内治疗在中高危患者慢性肢体缺血性疾病中的应用比较
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;80(1):204-212.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.03.025. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
4
Risk Factors for Major Amputation in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients Classified as Wound, Ischemia, and Foot Infection Stage 4 following Infrainguinal Revascularization.慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者在股腘以下血运重建后分类为 4 期(创面、缺血和足部感染)的主要截肢风险因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Aug;94:246-252. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Treatment Outcomes in Octogenarians with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia after Infrainguinal Bypass Surgery or Endovascular Therapy.八旬老人行下肢旁路手术或血管内治疗后慢性肢体严重缺血的治疗结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Sep;106:312-320. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 May 29.
6
Influence of inframalleolar modifier P0/P1 on wound healing in bypass surgery vs endovascular therapy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者旁路手术与血管内治疗中 inframalleolar 修饰 P0/P1 对伤口愈合的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Sep;80(3):792-799.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.040. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
7
Bypass Surgery Provides Better Outcomes Compared with Endovascular Therapy in the Composite Endpoint Comprising Relief from Rest Pain, Wound Healing, Limb Salvage, and Survival after Infra-inguinal Revascularisation in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.在慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者中,旁路手术在包括缓解静息痛、伤口愈合、肢体挽救和生存的复合终点方面优于血管内治疗。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Apr;63(4):588-593. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.043. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
8
Presenting limb severity is associated with long-term outcomes after infrainguinal revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.肢体严重程度与慢性肢体缺血性疾病下肢血运重建后的长期结果相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Apr;77(4):1137-1146.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.036. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
9
Impact of ambulatory status change on survival in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia undergoing infrainguinal surgical or endovascular revascularization.门诊状态变化对慢性肢体严重缺血行下肢血管腔内或手术血运重建患者生存的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jul;78(1):193-200.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.024. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
Validation of the GLASS Staging Systems in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Undergoing De Novo Infrainguinal Revascularization.GLASS分期系统在接受初次股腘动脉血管重建术的慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者中的验证
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;81:378-386. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.09.054. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Dementia on the Outcome of Surgical Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.痴呆对慢性肢体威胁性缺血手术血运重建结局的影响。
Ann Vasc Dis. 2025;18(1). doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.25-00040. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
Predictive Factors of Wound Healing and Limb Salvage After Successful Below-the-Knee Endovascular Angioplasty in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Retrospective Study.糖尿病足溃疡患者膝下血管腔内血管成形术成功后伤口愈合和保肢的预测因素:一项回顾性研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 6;61(2):277. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020277.