Wang Fu-Ping, Zhang Lei, Lyu Jian, Liu Yi, Xie Yan-Ming
Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing 100700,China.
Xiyuan Hospital,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing 100091,China.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2023 Aug;48(16):4493-4507. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20230515.502.
Meta-analysis and integrative bioinformatics were employed to comprehensively study the efficacy, safety, and mechanism of Huangkui Capsules in treating chronic kidney disease(CKD). CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trial(RCT) of Huangkui Capsules for CKD from inception to January 3, 2023. The outcome indicators included urine protein, serum creatinine(Scr), and blood urea nitrogen(BUN) levels, and Cochrane Handbook 5.1 and RevMan 5.3 were employed to perform the Meta-analysis of the included RCT. The active ingredients of Huangkui Capsules were retrieved from CNKI, and the targets of CKD from GeneCards, OMIM, and TTD. Cytoscape 3.8.0 was used to build a "component-disease" network and a protein-protein interaction(PPI) network for the screening of core components and targets. Next, a differential analysis of the core targets of Huangkui Capsules for treating CKD was conducted with the clinical samples from GEO to identify the differentially expressed core targets, and correlation analysis and immune cell infiltration analysis were then performed for these targets. A total of 13 RCTs were included for the Meta-analysis, involving 2 372 patients(1 185 in the observation group and 1 187 in the control group). Meta-analysis showed that the Huangkui Capsules group and the losartan potassium group had no significant differences in reducing the urinary protein levels after 12(MD=19.60, 95%CI[-58.66, 97.86], P=0.62) and 24 weeks(MD=-66.00, 95%CI[-264.10, 132.11], P=0.51) of treatment. Huangkui Capsules in combination with conventional treatment was superior to conventional treatment alone(MD=-0.55, 95%CI[-0.86,-0.23], P=0.000 6). Huangkui Capsules combined with conventional treatment was superior to conventional treatment alone in recovering Scr(MD=-9.21, 95%CI[-15.85,-2.58], P=0.006) and BUN(MD=-1.02, 95%CI[-1.83,-0.21], P=0.01). Five patients showed clear adverse reactions, with abdominal or gastrointestinal discomfort. Huangkui Capsules had 43 active ingredients and 393 targets, and the core ingredients were myricetin, quercetin, gossypin, elaidic acid, dihydromyricetin, isochlorogenic acid B, and caffeic acid. CKD and Huangkui Capsules shared 247 common targets, including 25 core targets. The GEO differential analysis predicted 18 differentially expressed core targets, which were mainly positively correlated with immune cell expression and involved in immune inflammation, oxidative stress, pyroptosis, lipid metabolism, sex hormone metabolism, and cell repair. Conclusively, Huangkui Capsules combined with conventional treatment significantly reduced urine protein, Scr, and BUN. Huangkui Capsules alone and losartan potassium had no significant difference in reducing urine protein. This efficacy of Huangkui Capsules may be associated with the multi-component, multi-target, and multi-pathway responses to immune inflammation and oxidative stress. The included RCT had small sample sizes and general quality. More clinical trial protocols with large sample sizes and rigorous design and in line with international norms are needed to improve the evidence quality, and the results of bioinformatics analysis remain to be confirmed by further studies.
采用Meta分析和整合生物信息学方法,全面研究黄葵胶囊治疗慢性肾脏病(CKD)的疗效、安全性及作用机制。检索中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库、考克兰图书馆、PubMed、EMbase和Web of Science等数据库,收集从建库至2023年1月3日期间关于黄葵胶囊治疗CKD的随机对照试验(RCT)。结局指标包括尿蛋白、血清肌酐(Scr)和血尿素氮(BUN)水平,采用考克兰手册5.1和RevMan 5.3软件对纳入的RCT进行Meta分析。从中国知网检索黄葵胶囊的活性成分,从GeneCards、OMIM和TTD数据库获取CKD的相关靶点。利用Cytoscape 3.8.0软件构建“成分-疾病”网络和蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)网络,筛选核心成分和靶点。然后,利用GEO数据库的临床样本对黄葵胶囊治疗CKD的核心靶点进行差异分析,鉴定差异表达的核心靶点,并对这些靶点进行相关性分析和免疫细胞浸润分析。共纳入13项RCT进行Meta分析,涉及2372例患者(观察组1185例,对照组1187例)。Meta分析结果显示,治疗12周(MD = 19.60,95%CI[-58.66, 97.86],P = 0.62)和24周(MD = -66.00,95%CI[-264.10, 132.11],P = 0.51)后,黄葵胶囊组与氯沙坦钾组降低尿蛋白水平的差异无统计学意义。黄葵胶囊联合常规治疗优于单纯常规治疗(MD = -0.55,95%CI[-0.86, -0.23],P = 0.0006)。黄葵胶囊联合常规治疗在恢复Scr(MD = -9.21,95%CI[-15.85, -2.58],P = 0.006)和BUN(MD = -1.02,95%CI[-1.83, -0.21],P = 0.01)方面优于单纯常规治疗。5例患者出现明显不良反应,表现为腹部或胃肠道不适。黄葵胶囊有43种活性成分和393个靶点,核心成分有杨梅素、槲皮素、棉子糖、反油酸、二氢杨梅素、异绿原酸B和咖啡酸。CKD与黄葵胶囊共有247个共同靶点,其中包括25个核心靶点。GEO差异分析预测出18个差异表达的核心靶点,这些靶点主要与免疫细胞表达呈正相关,涉及免疫炎症、氧化应激、细胞焦亡、脂质代谢、性激素代谢和细胞修复等过程。综上所述,黄葵胶囊联合常规治疗可显著降低尿蛋白、Scr和BUN。黄葵胶囊单药与氯沙坦钾在降低尿蛋白方面无显著差异。黄葵胶囊的这种疗效可能与多成分、多靶点、多途径作用于免疫炎症和氧化应激反应有关。纳入的RCT样本量较小,质量一般。需要更多大样本、设计严谨且符合国际规范的临床试验方案来提高证据质量,生物信息学分析结果仍有待进一步研究证实。