Huber F, Köberle S, Prestele H, Spiegel R
Curr Med Res Opin. 1986;10(4):256-79. doi: 10.1185/03007998609110447.
Five-year results are reported of a controlled long-term comparative study to assess the effects of ergoloid mesylates (1.5 mg 3-times daily) and placebo on medical, psychological and electrophysiological variables. Initially, 148 healthy elderly volunteers of both sexes were included. Eighty-nine subjects (48 on ergoloid mesylates and 41 on placebo) are still in the double-blind study; 39 subjects have left the trial for various reasons (6 deaths, 25 drop-outs due to disease, and 8 withdrawals) and 20 subjects are participating under 'open' conditions. Formal statistical comparison of the two groups in terms of 10 medical and psychometric outcome variables did not produce significant differences. However, a number of relevant findings and trends with regard to the effects of ergoloid mesylates were established: the drug was well tolerated objectively and subjectively; subjective complaints such as frequent dizziness, cardiac symptoms and leg cramps were improved; there was less increase than on placebo in the number of subjects with pathological ECG findings; there was less increase than on placebo in the number of subjects taking digitalis; fewer subjects than in the placebo group had an increase in the number of major diagnoses; the decrease in some lipid fractions was more pronounced than on placebo; and performance in some psychometric tests (WAIS Vocabulary, WAIS Performance) was better in the ergoloid mesylates group. None of these findings, by itself, would be evidence of a dramatic effect of ergoloid mesylates on the participants in the double-blind trial. Taken together, however, they fall into a pattern, suggesting that ergoloid mesylates was partly effective in maintaining physical and mental health in these healthy elderly individuals. The finding of more disease-related and symptom-related drop-outs in the placebo group (25 vs. 20 in the ergoloid mesylates group) supports this assumption. Furthermore, the fact that a number of subjects who had left the double-blind trial for medical reasons improved on subsequent ergoloid mesylates administration may be seen as a further argument in favour of a prophylactic effect of ergoloid mesylates on pathological concomitants of ageing.
报告了一项对照长期比较研究的五年结果,该研究旨在评估甲磺酸双氢麦角毒碱(每日3次,每次1.5毫克)和安慰剂对医学、心理和电生理变量的影响。最初纳入了148名健康的老年男女志愿者。89名受试者(48名服用甲磺酸双氢麦角毒碱,41名服用安慰剂)仍在双盲研究中;39名受试者因各种原因退出试验(6人死亡,25人因病退出,8人主动退出),20名受试者在“开放”条件下参与研究。对两组在10项医学和心理测量结果变量方面进行的正式统计学比较未产生显著差异。然而,关于甲磺酸双氢麦角毒碱的作用确立了一些相关发现和趋势:该药物在客观和主观上耐受性良好;频繁头晕、心脏症状和腿部痉挛等主观不适有所改善;病理性心电图结果的受试者数量比服用安慰剂时增加得少;服用洋地黄的受试者数量比服用安慰剂时增加得少;主要诊断数量增加的受试者比安慰剂组少;一些脂质成分的降低比服用安慰剂时更明显;在一些心理测量测试(韦氏成人智力量表词汇、韦氏成人智力量表操作)中,甲磺酸双氢麦角毒碱组的表现更好。这些发现单独来看,都不足以证明甲磺酸双氢麦角毒碱对双盲试验参与者有显著效果。然而,综合起来,它们呈现出一种模式,表明甲磺酸双氢麦角毒碱在维持这些健康老年人的身心健康方面有部分效果。安慰剂组中与疾病和症状相关的退出者更多(25人,而甲磺酸双氢麦角毒碱组为20人)这一发现支持了这一假设。此外,一些因医学原因离开双盲试验的受试者在随后服用甲磺酸双氢麦角毒碱后病情有所改善,这一事实可被视为支持甲磺酸双氢麦角毒碱对衰老相关病理状况具有预防作用的进一步论据。