Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Feb 20;109(3):722-729. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad591.
American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines do not consider age at diagnosis as a prognostic factor on the estimation of the risk of persistent/recurrent disease in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) patients. While age at diagnosis has already been assessed in high-risk patients, it remains to be established in low- and intermediate-risk patients.
The aim of our study was to investigate the role of age as a prognostic factor in the short- and long-term outcome of DTC patients classified at low and intermediate risk according to the ATA stratification risk system.
We retrospectively evaluated 863 DTC patients (mean follow-up: 10 ± 6.2 years) 52% classified as low (449/863) and 48% as intermediate risk (414/863). For each ATA-risk class patients were divided into subgroups based on age at diagnosis (<55 or ≥55 years).
In the intermediate-risk group, patients aged 55 years or older had a higher rate of structural disease (11.6% vs 8.9%), recurrent disease (4.1% vs 0.7%), and death (4.1% vs 1%) when compared with younger patients (<55 years) (P = .007). Multivariate analysis confirmed that older age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9; 95% CI, 1.9-8.6; P < .001) was an independent risk factor for worse long-term outcome together with response to initial therapy (OR = 13.0; 95% CI, 6.3-27.9; P < .001), and T (OR = 32; 95% CI, 1.4-7.1; P = .005) and N category (OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-5.0; P = .03). Nevertheless, a negative effect of older age was documented only in the subgroup of intermediate DTC patients with persistent structural disease after initial therapy. Indeed, the rate of worse long-term outcome rose from 13.3% in the whole population of intermediate DTC patients to 47.8% in patients with persistent structural disease after initial therapy (P < .001) and to 80% in patients older than 55 years and persistent structural disease after initial therapy (P = .02).
Our results suggest that age at diagnosis further predict individual outcomes in Intermediate-Risk DTC allowing ongoing management to be tailored accordingly.
美国甲状腺协会(ATA)指南并未将诊断时的年龄视为影响分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者持续性/复发性疾病风险的预后因素。虽然已经在高危患者中评估了诊断时的年龄,但在低危和中危患者中仍有待确定。
我们的研究旨在探讨年龄作为预后因素在根据 ATA 分层风险系统分类为低危和中危的 DTC 患者的短期和长期结局中的作用。
我们回顾性评估了 863 例 DTC 患者(平均随访时间:10±6.2 年),其中 52%(449/863)为低危,48%(414/863)为中危。对于每个 ATA 风险类别,根据诊断时的年龄(<55 岁或≥55 岁)将患者分为亚组。
在中危组中,与年龄<55 岁的患者相比,年龄≥55 岁的患者结构性疾病(11.6%比 8.9%)、复发性疾病(4.1%比 0.7%)和死亡(4.1%比 1%)的发生率更高(P=.007)。多变量分析证实,诊断时年龄较大(优势比[OR]为 3.9;95%置信区间,1.9-8.6;P<.001)与初始治疗反应(OR=13.0;95%置信区间,6.3-27.9;P<.001)以及 T 期(OR=32;95%置信区间,1.4-7.1;P=.005)和 N 期(OR=2.3;95%置信区间,1.1-5.0;P=.03)是影响长期预后的独立危险因素。然而,仅在初始治疗后持续存在结构性疾病的中危 DTC 患者亚组中观察到年龄较大的负面影响。事实上,在初始治疗后持续存在结构性疾病的中危 DTC 患者的整体人群中,较差的长期预后发生率从 13.3%上升至 47.8%(P<.001),在年龄>55 岁且初始治疗后持续存在结构性疾病的患者中上升至 80%(P=.02)。
我们的结果表明,诊断时的年龄进一步预测了中危 DTC 的个体结局,允许根据需要进行个体化管理。