KU Leuven, Biosystems Department, Animal and Human Health Engineering Division, Campus Geel, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2440 Geel, Belgium.
KU Leuven, Biosystems Department, Animal and Human Health Engineering Division, Campus Geel, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2440 Geel, Belgium; Ghent University, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Nov;220:106033. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.106033. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
This study aims to describe the relation between farm-level management factors and estimated farm-level mastitis incidence and milk loss traits (MIMLT) at dairy farms with automated milking systems. In this observational study, 43 commercial dairy farms in Belgium and the Netherlands were included and 148 'management and udder health related variables' were obtained during a farm visit through a farm audit and survey. The MIMLT were estimated from milk yield data. Quarter-level milk yield perturbations that were caused by presumable mastitis cases (PMC) were selected based on quarter-level milk yield and electrical conductivity. On average, 57.6 ± 5.4% of the identified milk yield perturbations complied with our criteria. From these PMC, 3 farm-level MIMLT were calculated over a one-year period around the farm visit date: (1) the 'average number of PMC per cow per year', (2) the 'absolute milk loss per cow per day', calculated as the farm-level sum of all milk losses during PMC in one year, divided by the average number of lactating cows and the number of days, and (3) the 'relative milk loss', calculated as the farm-level sum of milk losses during PMC in one year, divided by the estimated total production in the absence of PMC. The 'average number of PMC per cow per year' was on average 1.81 ± 0.47. The PMC caused an average milk loss of 0.77 ± 0.26 kg per lactating cow per day, which corresponded to an average production loss of 2.38 ± 0.82% of the expected production in the absence of PMC. We performed a principal component regression (PCR) analysis to link the 3 MIMLT to the 'management and udder health related variables', whilst reducing the multicollinearity and the number of dimensions. The first principal component was mainly related to 'milking system brand, maintenance and settings'. The second component mainly linked to average productivity and somatic cell counts, whereas the third component mainly contained variables linked with mastitis management, treatment, and biosecurity. The 3 PCR models had R² ranging from 0.46 (for absolute milk loss per cow per day) to 0.57 (for relative milk loss). For all models, the second PC had the largest effect size. This analysis raises awareness of the impact of management factors on a factual basis and provides handles to take management actions to improve udder health.
本研究旨在描述农场层面管理因素与使用自动化挤奶系统的奶牛场乳腺炎预估农场发病率和牛奶损失特征(MIMLT)之间的关系。在这项观察性研究中,比利时和荷兰的 43 个商业奶牛场被纳入研究,在农场访问期间,通过农场审计和调查获得了 148 个“管理和乳房健康相关变量”。通过牛奶产量数据估计 MIMLT。根据季度牛奶产量和电导率,选择了疑似乳腺炎病例(PMC)引起的季度牛奶产量波动。平均而言,57.6%±5.4%的鉴定牛奶产量波动符合我们的标准。从这些 PMC 中,我们在农场访问日期前后的一年期间计算了 3 个农场水平的 MIMLT:(1)“奶牛每年每头的 PMC 平均数量”,(2)“每头奶牛每天的绝对牛奶损失”,计算方法是一年中所有 PMC 期间的农场级牛奶损失总和除以平均泌乳牛数和天数,(3)“相对牛奶损失”,计算方法是一年中所有 PMC 期间的农场级牛奶损失总和除以预期无 PMC 时的总产量。“奶牛每年每头的 PMC 平均数量”平均为 1.81±0.47。PMC 导致每头泌乳牛每天平均牛奶损失 0.77±0.26 公斤,这相当于在没有 PMC 的情况下预期产量的平均损失为 2.38±0.82%。我们进行了主成分回归(PCR)分析,将 3 个 MIMLT 与“管理和乳房健康相关变量”联系起来,同时减少了多重共线性和维度数量。第一主成分主要与“挤奶系统品牌、维护和设置”有关。第二成分主要与平均生产力和体细胞计数相关,而第三成分主要包含与乳腺炎管理、治疗和生物安全相关的变量。3 个 PCR 模型的 R² 范围从 0.46(绝对牛奶损失每头奶牛每天)到 0.57(相对牛奶损失)。对于所有模型,第二 PC 的影响最大。这项分析在事实基础上提高了对管理因素对实际发病率的影响的认识,并提供了采取管理措施改善乳房健康的抓手。