Suppr超能文献

Portex 在线血液加温器的临床效能

The clinical efficiency of the Portex in-line blood warmer.

作者信息

Linko K

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1986 Mar;3(2):121-5.

PMID:3780686
Abstract

The Portex blood warming coil (200/700/000) and water bath (500/111/010) were tested by comparing the body temperatures of two groups of patients undergoing similar operations, but having transfusions of different rate and quantity. The skin and oesophageal temperatures in the massively transfused patients (5-31 units) did not differ significantly from those having minor transfusions (1-5 units). The temperatures were well maintained in both groups. The lowest mean oesophageal temperatures, during the transfusions, were 35.2 +/- 0.2 in the massively transfused patients and 35.4 +/- 0.1 (SEM) in the control group. The warming capacity of the Portex blood warmer was therefore sufficient for our patients. If, however, transfusion rates, higher than those in this study (maximum 96 ml min-1 during the rapid transfusion phase) are needed, a more effective blood warmer may be beneficial.

摘要

通过比较两组接受类似手术但输血速度和输血量不同的患者的体温,对Portex血液加温盘管(200/700/000)和水浴箱(500/111/010)进行了测试。大量输血患者(5 - 31单位)的皮肤和食管温度与少量输血患者(1 - 5单位)相比,差异无统计学意义。两组患者的体温均保持良好。输血期间,大量输血患者食管平均最低温度为35.2±0.2,对照组为35.4±0.1(标准误)。因此,Portex血液加温器的加温能力对我们的患者来说是足够的。然而,如果需要高于本研究中的输血速度(快速输血阶段最高96毫升/分钟),则使用更有效的血液加温器可能会有益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验