• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用多准则决策方法评估机场的可持续发展目标。

Evaluating airports' Sustainable Development Goals by using multi-criteria decision making methodologies.

作者信息

Durmaz Vildan, Yazgan Ebru, Delice Elif Kiliç, Çelem Beste Pelin

机构信息

Department of Aviation Management, Eskisehir Technical University, Eskisehir, Turkey.

Department of Airframe and Powerplant Maintenance, Eskisehir Technical University, Eskisehir, Turkey.

出版信息

Work. 2024;77(3):851-864. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220385.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-220385
PMID:37807792
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recent growth of the aviation industry, which poses significant environmental challenges, has heightened the pressure on the sustainability of airports. Airport sustainability requires a holistic approach that encompasses economic, social, environmental, and operational aspects. In this regard, the United Nations' 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Agenda provides a roadmap for the aviation industry. However, despite recognizing the importance of SDGs, aviation authorities and airports often fail to effectively integrate them into their activities and annual reports.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the significance of SDGs for airports and select the airport that prioritizes SDGs the most using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodologies.

METHODS

This study introduces a novel approach that integrates Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methods, which are MCDM techniques, to enhance airport sustainability. The SWARA method is employed to evaluate and assign weights to the SDGs in the context of airports.

RESULTS

SDG 8 holds the highest level of significance among the goals concerning airports, while SDG 14 falls outside the scope of airport sustainability aspects. Then, five international airports that have been designated as green airports by aviation authorities and assessment organizations are selected, and the optimal alternative is determined using the WASPAS method, considering the weights obtained through SWARA.

CONCLUSION

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport is the top choice due to its successful implementations and reports aligning with the SDGs.

摘要

背景

航空业近期的发展给环境带来了重大挑战,这加大了机场可持续发展的压力。机场可持续发展需要一种涵盖经济、社会、环境和运营等方面的整体方法。在这方面,联合国的17项可持续发展目标(SDGs)议程为航空业提供了路线图。然而,尽管认识到可持续发展目标的重要性,但航空当局和机场往往未能有效地将其纳入其活动和年度报告中。

目的

本研究旨在评估可持续发展目标对机场的重要性,并使用多准则决策(MCDM)方法选择最优先考虑可持续发展目标的机场。

方法

本研究引入了一种新颖的方法,该方法整合了逐步权重评估比率分析(SWARA)和加权聚合总和乘积评估(WASPAS)方法,这两种方法均为多准则决策技术,以提高机场的可持续性。SWARA方法用于在机场背景下评估可持续发展目标并为其分配权重。

结果

在与机场相关的目标中,可持续发展目标8具有最高的重要性水平,而可持续发展目标14不属于机场可持续发展方面的范畴。然后,选择了五个被航空当局和评估组织指定为绿色机场的国际机场,并使用WASPAS方法,考虑通过SWARA获得的权重,确定最佳选择。

结论

达拉斯/沃思堡国际机场是首选,因为其成功的实施和与可持续发展目标一致的报告。

相似文献

1
Evaluating airports' Sustainable Development Goals by using multi-criteria decision making methodologies.运用多准则决策方法评估机场的可持续发展目标。
Work. 2024;77(3):851-864. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220385.
2
Sustainability at airports: Technologies and best practices from ASEAN countries.机场的可持续发展:东盟国家的技术与最佳实践
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 1;299:113639. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113639. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
3
A comparison of sustainability theory with UK and European airports policy and practice.可持续发展理论与英国及欧洲机场政策和实践的比较。
J Environ Manage. 2001 Nov;63(3):237-48. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0469.
4
Urban health: an example of a "health in all policies" approach in the context of SDGs implementation.城市健康:在实现可持续发展目标背景下“所有政策促进健康”方法的一个范例。
Global Health. 2019 Dec 18;15(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0529-z.
5
The synergistic evolution of supply-demand composite system for airport green development: A case study in Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport, China.机场绿色发展供需复合系统的协同演化:以中国广州白云国际机场为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 30;19(4):e0302303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302303. eCollection 2024.
6
Assessing the synergy and sustainability of "Airport-Industry-City"(AIC) system in aerotropolis: Evidence from Zhengzhou Aerotropolis in China.评估航空大都市(AIC)系统的协同性和可持续性:来自中国郑州航空大都市的证据。
Environ Res. 2021 Apr;195:110886. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110886. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
7
Measuring and evaluating SDG indicators with Big Earth Data.利用大数据测量和评估可持续发展目标指标。
Sci Bull (Beijing). 2022 Sep 15;67(17):1792-1801. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
8
Evaluation of sustainable hydrogen production technologies on an industrial scale using comparative analysis of decision-making methods.利用决策方法的比较分析对工业规模的可持续制氢技术进行评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May 4. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33535-z.
9
The Sustainable Development Goals: A framework for addressing participation of persons with complex communication needs in South Africa.可持续发展目标:解决南非复杂沟通需求人群参与问题的框架。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Feb;25(1):47-51. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2143566. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
10
Toward Environmental Sustainability, Health, and Equity: How the Psychological Characteristics of College Students Are Reflected in Understanding Sustainable Development Goals.迈向环境可持续性、健康和公平:大学生的心理特征如何反映在对可持续发展目标的理解中。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 3;18(15):8217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158217.