Lee Eon-Bee, Abbas Muhammad Aleem, Park Jonghyun, Tassew Dereje D, Park Seung-Chun
Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
DIVA Bio Incorporation, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 22;14:1258403. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1258403. eCollection 2023.
Formulating a therapeutic strategy that can effectively combat concurrent infections of () and () can be challenging. This study aimed to 1) establish minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), time kill curve, and post-antibiotic effect (PAE) of tylosin against and pig isolates and employ the MIC data for the development of epidemiological cutoff (ECOFF) values; 2) estimate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of tylosin following its intramuscular (IM) administration (20 mg/kg) in healthy and infected pigs; and 3) establish a PK-pharmacodynamic (PD) integrated model and predict optimal dosing regimens and PK/PD cutoff values for tylosin in healthy and infected pigs. The MIC of tylosin against both 89 and 363 isolates of and strains spread widely, ranging from 1 to 256 μg/mL and from 0.5 to 128 μg/mL, respectively. According to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) ECOFFinder analysis ECOFF value (≤64 µg/mL), 97.75% (87 strains) of the isolates were wild-type, whereas with the same ECOFF value (≤64 µg/mL), 99.72% (363 strains) of the isolates were considered wild-type to tylosin. Area under the concentration time curve (AUC), T, and C values were significantly greater in healthy pigs than those in infected pigs (13.33 h × μg/mL, 1.99 h, and 5.79 μg/mL vs. 10.46 h × μg/mL, 1.83 h, and 3.59 μg/mL, respectively) ( < 0.05). In healthy pigs, AUC/MIC values for the bacteriostatic activity were 0.98 and 1.10 h; for the bactericidal activity, AUC/MIC values were 1.97 and 1.99 h for and , respectively. In infected pigs, AUC/MIC values for the bacteriostatic activity were 1.03 and 1.12 h; for bactericidal activity, AUC/MIC values were 2.54 and 2.36 h for and , respectively. Monte Carlo simulation lead to a 2 μg/mL calculated PK/PD cutoff. Managing co-infections can present challenges, as it often demands the administration of multiple antibiotics to address diverse pathogens. However, using tylosin, which effectively targets both and in pigs, may enhance the control of bacterial burden. By employing an optimized dosage of 11.94-15.37 mg/kg and 25.17-27.79 mg/kg of tylosin can result in achieving bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects in 90% of co-infected pigs.
制定一种能够有效对抗()和()并发感染的治疗策略可能具有挑战性。本研究旨在:1)确定泰乐菌素对猪源()和()分离株的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)、最低杀菌浓度(MBC)、时间杀菌曲线和抗生素后效应(PAE),并利用MIC数据制定流行病学临界值(ECOFF);2)估计健康猪和感染猪肌肉注射(IM)泰乐菌素(20mg/kg)后的药代动力学(PK);3)建立PK-药效学(PD)整合模型,预测健康猪和感染猪中泰乐菌素的最佳给药方案和PK/PD临界值。泰乐菌素对89株和363株()和()菌株的MIC分布广泛,分别为1至256μg/mL和0.5至128μg/mL。根据欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)ECOFFinder分析的ECOFF值(≤64μg/mL),97.75%(87株)的()分离株为野生型,而对于相同的ECOFF值(≤64μg/mL),99.72%(363株)的()分离株被认为对泰乐菌素是野生型。健康猪的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)、T和C值显著高于感染猪(分别为13.33h×μg/mL、1.99h和5.79μg/mL,而感染猪分别为10.46h×μg/mL、1.83h和3.59μg/mL)(P<0.05)。在健康猪中,泰乐菌素抑菌活性的AUC/MIC值分别为0.98和1.10h;杀菌活性的AUC/MIC值,()和()分别为1.97和1.99h。在感染猪中,泰乐菌素抑菌活性的AUC/MIC值分别为1.03和1.12h;杀菌活性的AUC/MIC值,()和()分别为2.54和2.36h。蒙特卡洛模拟得出计算的PK/PD临界值为2μg/mL。控制混合感染可能具有挑战性,因为通常需要使用多种抗生素来应对不同的病原体。然而,使用能有效针对猪源()和()的泰乐菌素,可能会增强对细菌负荷的控制。通过采用11.94 - 15.37mg/kg和25.17 - 27.79mg/kg的优化剂量,泰乐菌素可使90%的混合感染猪达到抑菌和杀菌效果。