Lv Chen, Wang Xinqun, Xue Sheng, Xia Xinxing, Wang Shuang
College of Quality and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Key Laboratory of Safety and High-efficiency Coal Mining, the Ministry of Education(Anhui University of Science and Technology), Huainan, 232001, China.
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 1;9(9):e19747. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19747. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Investigations into the deactivation of explosion sensitivity and reduction of flame propagation for aluminium alloy polishing wastes were carried out by the addition of ultrafine Al(OH) inerting agent. Meanwhile, high-purity aluminium powders with similar mean diameters were also used as a comparative study. The explosion propagation characteristics of high-purity aluminium dust and aluminium alloy polishing waste dust under different inerting ratios () were tested and investigated using a standardised Hartmann tester and a developed experimental platform. The results show that the minimum ignition energy of high-purity aluminium powder is between 40 and 45 mJ, and the minimum ignition energy of aluminium alloy polishing waste is between 500 and 550 mJ, which is one order of magnitude higher than that of high-purity aluminium powder. The lower explosion limit concentration of aluminium alloy polishing waste dust is 150 g/m, which is 53.33% of that of high-purity aluminium powder. According to the analysis of the SEM image, the main reason is that the spherical particles of high-purity aluminium dust have a folded surface and good dispersion. Compared with the smooth fibre surface of aluminium alloy polishing waste dust, the former is easier to contact with air and the contact area is larger. Therefore, in engineering practice, it is not appropriate to use high-purity aluminium dust-related explosion parameters as the basis for the risk assessment of combustion and explosion at aluminium alloy polishing work sites. In addition, as the dust concentration decreases, the combustion intensity of high-purity aluminium dust and aluminium alloy polishing waste dust also decreases, and the flame propagation appears to be a discontinuous phenomenon. The peak flame propagation velocity of aluminium alloy polishing waste is 7.368 m/s at a concentration of 300 g/m, which is 56.85% of that of high-purity aluminium powder. As the inerting ratio increases, the propagation velocity of the explosion flame slows down. When the inerting ratio reaches 30%, the minimum ignition energy of aluminium alloy polishing waste is inerted to 1 J, and self-sustained flame propagation cannot be formed. The results show that the ultra-fine Al(OH) powder has a significant inerting effect and is a realistic possibility in the production of aluminium alloy polishing.
通过添加超细Al(OH) 惰性剂,对铝合金抛光废料的爆炸敏感度失活和火焰传播减弱进行了研究。同时,还使用了平均直径相似的高纯铝粉进行对比研究。采用标准化的哈特曼测试仪和自行搭建的实验平台,对不同惰化率()下高纯铝粉和铝合金抛光废料粉尘的爆炸传播特性进行了测试和研究。结果表明,高纯铝粉的最小点火能在40~45 mJ之间,铝合金抛光废料的最小点火能在500~550 mJ之间,比高纯铝粉高一个数量级。铝合金抛光废料粉尘的爆炸下限浓度为150 g/m,是高纯铝粉的53.33%。通过扫描电子显微镜图像分析,主要原因是高纯铝粉的球形颗粒表面有褶皱且分散性好。与铝合金抛光废料粉尘光滑的纤维表面相比,前者更容易与空气接触且接触面积更大。因此,在工程实践中,不宜以高纯铝粉相关的爆炸参数作为铝合金抛光作业场所燃烧爆炸风险评估的依据。此外,随着粉尘浓度降低,高纯铝粉和铝合金抛光废料粉尘的燃烧强度也降低,火焰传播呈现出不连续现象。铝合金抛光废料在浓度为300 g/m时的峰值火焰传播速度为7.368 m/s,是高纯铝粉的56.85%。随着惰化率增加,爆炸火焰的传播速度减慢。当惰化率达到30%时,铝合金抛光废料的最小点火能被惰化至1 J,无法形成自持火焰传播。结果表明,超细Al(OH) 粉末具有显著的惰化效果,在铝合金抛光生产中具有现实可行性。