• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生产还是不生产?对比药物滥用在社会决策情境中的影响。

To produce or not to produce? Contrasting the effect of substance abuse in social decision-making situations.

作者信息

Avila-Chauvet Laurent, Mejía Cruz Diana, García-Leal Óscar, Kluwe-Schiavon Bruno

机构信息

Sonora Institute of Technology, Sonora, Mexico.

European University of Madrid, Sonora, Mexico.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Sep 1;9(9):e19714. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19714. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19714
PMID:37809835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10559002/
Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUD) have been related to high criminal justice costs, expensive healthcare, social impairment, and decision-making deficits. In non-social decision-making tasks, people with SUD tend to take more risks and choose small immediate rewards than controls. However, few studies have explored how people with SUD behave in social decision-making situations where the resources and profits depend directly on participants' real-time interaction, i.e., social foraging situations. To fulfill this gap, we developed a real-time interaction task to (a) compare the proportion of producers (individuals who tend to search for food sources) and scroungers (individuals who tend to steal or join previously discovered food sources) among participants with SUD and controls with respect to the optimal behavior predicted by the Rate Maximization Model, and (b) explore the relationship between social foraging strategies, prosocial behavior, and impulsivity. Here participants with SUD (n = 20) and a non-user control group (n = 20) were exposed to the Guaymas Foraging task (GFT), the Social Discounting task (SD), and the Delay Discounting task (DD). We found that participants in the control group tended to produce more and obtain higher profits in contrast to substance abuser groups. Additionally, SD and DD rates were higher for scroungers than producers regardless of the group. Our results suggest that producers tend to be more altruistic and less impulsive than scroungers. Knowing more about social strategies and producers' characteristics could help develop substance abuse prevention programs.

摘要

物质使用障碍(SUD)与高昂的刑事司法成本、昂贵的医疗保健、社会功能受损以及决策缺陷有关。在非社会决策任务中,患有物质使用障碍的人比对照组更容易冒险并选择即时的小奖励。然而,很少有研究探讨患有物质使用障碍的人在社会决策情境中的行为表现,在这种情境中,资源和收益直接取决于参与者的实时互动,即社会觅食情境。为了填补这一空白,我们开发了一项实时互动任务,以(a)比较患有物质使用障碍的参与者和对照组中生产者(倾向于寻找食物来源的个体)和偷窃者(倾向于偷窃或加入先前发现的食物来源的个体)的比例,这是根据速率最大化模型预测的最优行为;(b)探索社会觅食策略、亲社会行为和冲动性之间的关系。在这里,患有物质使用障碍的参与者(n = 20)和非使用者对照组(n = 20)参与了瓜伊马斯觅食任务(GFT)、社会折扣任务(SD)和延迟折扣任务(DD)。我们发现,与药物滥用者组相比,对照组的参与者倾向于更多地生产并获得更高的利润。此外,无论哪一组,偷窃者的SD和DD率都高于生产者。我们的结果表明,生产者往往比偷窃者更利他且更不易冲动。更多地了解社会策略和生产者的特征有助于制定药物滥用预防计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7307/10559002/8720c07bb60f/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7307/10559002/cc030ff5f40f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7307/10559002/8fe7f082847a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7307/10559002/b1f06d74e402/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7307/10559002/c47310d566ca/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7307/10559002/8720c07bb60f/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7307/10559002/cc030ff5f40f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7307/10559002/8fe7f082847a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7307/10559002/b1f06d74e402/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7307/10559002/c47310d566ca/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7307/10559002/8720c07bb60f/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
To produce or not to produce? Contrasting the effect of substance abuse in social decision-making situations.生产还是不生产?对比药物滥用在社会决策情境中的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 1;9(9):e19714. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19714. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
An asymmetric producer-scrounger game: body size and the social foraging behavior of coho salmon.一种不对称的生产者-掠夺者博弈:体型与银大麻哈鱼的社会觅食行为
Theor Ecol. 2018;11(4):417-431. doi: 10.1007/s12080-018-0375-2. Epub 2018 May 1.
3
Impulsive decision-making predicts the course of substance-related and addictive disorders.冲动决策预测物质相关和成瘾障碍的病程。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Sep;237(9):2709-2724. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05567-z. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
4
Producers, scroungers and the price of a free meal.生产者、寄生者与免费餐食的代价。
Anim Behav. 1998 Mar;55(3):737-44. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0649.
5
The patch distributed producer-scrounger game.分布式搭便车生产者-觅食者游戏的补丁。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Sep 21;260(2):261-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
6
Altered social and non-social decision-making in recreational and dependent cocaine users.娱乐性和成瘾性可卡因使用者的社交及非社交决策改变。
Psychol Med. 2014 Apr;44(5):1015-28. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001839. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
7
Effects of Substance Misuse and Family History of Substance Use Disorder on Delay Discounting in Adolescents and Young Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.物质滥用及物质使用障碍家族史对患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的青少年及青年延迟折扣的影响
Eur Addict Res. 2020;26(4-5):295-305. doi: 10.1159/000509147. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
8
Reward-Related Decision-Making in Current and Past Disordered Gambling: Implications for Impulsive Choice and Risk Preference in the Maintenance of Gambling Disorder.当前及既往病理性赌博中与奖励相关的决策:对冲动选择及风险偏好于病理性赌博维持中的影响
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Oct 29;15:758329. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.758329. eCollection 2021.
9
Stable producer-scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour.野生鸟类中稳定的生产者-窃取者动态:社交性和学习速度与窃取行为共同变化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 12;284(1852). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2872.
10
Comorbid depression, antisocial personality, and substance dependence: Relationship with delay discounting.共病抑郁、反社会人格与物质依赖:与延迟折扣的关系。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Mar 1;160:190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Shaping decision-making with screen time: video-based dialectical behavior therapy skills training for college students.利用屏幕时间塑造决策:针对大学生的基于视频的辩证行为疗法技能培训
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 9;16:1609744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1609744. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision-Making Under Risk and Uncertainty by Substance Abusers and Healthy Controls.药物滥用者和健康对照者在风险和不确定性下的决策
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 28;12:788280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.788280. eCollection 2021.
2
A Systematic Review of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) in Alcohol Research.酒精研究中气球模拟风险任务(BART)的系统评价。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2022 Jan 8;57(1):85-103. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agab004.
3
Effect of group size on producer-scrounger strategies of Wistar rats.群体大小对 Wistar 大鼠生产者-清道夫策略的影响。
Behav Processes. 2021 Jan;182:104280. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104280. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
4
Consequences of multiple simultaneous opportunities to exploit others' efforts on free riding.利用他人努力进行搭便车的多个同时出现的机会所带来的后果。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr 16;10(10):4343-4351. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6201. eCollection 2020 May.
5
Delay discounting of different outcomes: Review and theory.不同结果的延迟折扣:综述与理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 May;113(3):657-679. doi: 10.1002/jeab.589. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
6
Substance related disorders are associated with impaired valuation of delayed gratification and feedback processing: A multilevel meta-analysis and meta-regression.物质相关障碍与延迟满足和反馈处理的估值受损有关:多层次元分析和元回归。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jan;108:295-307. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.016. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
Cocaine use disorder in females is associated with altered social decision-making: a study with the prisoner's dilemma and the ultimatum game.女性可卡因使用障碍与社会决策改变有关:囚徒困境和最后通牒游戏的研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2198-0.
8
Generalizability is not optional: insights from a cross-cultural study of social discounting.普遍性并非可有可无:社会贴现跨文化研究的见解
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Feb 27;6(2):181386. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181386. eCollection 2019 Feb.
9
Factors underlying risk taking in heroin-dependent individuals: Feedback processing and environmental contingencies.海洛因依赖者冒险行为的潜在因素:反馈处理与环境偶然性
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Sep 17;350:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.04.052. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
Persistent producer-scrounger relationships in bats.蝙蝠中持久的生产者-清道夫关系。
Sci Adv. 2018 Feb 7;4(2):e1603293. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1603293. eCollection 2018 Feb.