Marazita M L, Goldstein A M, Smalley S L, Spence M A
Genet Epidemiol. 1986;3(5):335-42. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370030506.
The study population consists of 424 three-generation families originally ascertained through nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL +/- P) surgical probands by Carter et al [J Med Genet 19:246-261, 1982] in London, England. Carter et al proposed that the multifactorial threshold model (MF/T) could explain the data. The goal of our study was to test that hypothesis, plus alternatives, rigorously. Two approaches were used: 1) Carter et al had proposed that these data were consistent with the predictions of the MF/T as presented by Carter [Br Med Bull 25:52-57, 1969]. However, we tested those predictions using standard chi 2 tests and found statistically significant departures from the predictions in these families. 2) Complex segregation analysis under the mixed model was performed. Again, the MF/T model could be rejected, as could a model of a major locus alone. The best-fitting model included both major locus and multifactorial components. When the data were analyzed in two parts based on the proband's phenotype (CL vs CL + P) there was some evidence of heterogeneity in that there was a significant proportion of sporadic cases in the families of CL probands but not in the families of CL + P probands. Our results provide no support for the MF/T model. The results from segregation analyses of CL +/- P in these families were most consistent with autosomal major gene inheritance plus multifactorial contributions.
研究人群包括424个三代家庭,最初是由卡特等人[《医学遗传学杂志》19:246 - 261,1982年]在英国伦敦通过非综合征性唇裂伴或不伴腭裂(CL +/- P)手术先证者确定的。卡特等人提出多因素阈值模型(MF/T)可以解释这些数据。我们研究的目的是严格检验该假设以及其他替代假设。使用了两种方法:1)卡特等人提出这些数据与卡特[《英国医学公报》25:52 - 57,1969年]提出的MF/T的预测一致。然而,我们使用标准卡方检验对这些预测进行了检验,发现这些家庭中的预测存在统计学上的显著偏差。2)进行了混合模型下的复杂分离分析。同样,MF/T模型以及仅一个主基因座的模型都可以被拒绝。拟合度最好的模型包括主基因座和多因素成分。当根据先证者的表型(CL与CL + P)将数据分为两部分进行分析时,有一些异质性的证据,即CL先证者家庭中有相当比例的散发病例,而CL + P先证者家庭中则没有。我们的结果不支持MF/T模型。这些家庭中CL +/- P的分离分析结果与常染色体主基因遗传加上多因素贡献最为一致。