Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Division of Geriatrics and Aging, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Nov 1;183(11):1247-1254. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.5225.
Turnover in health care staff may disrupt patient care and create operational and organizational challenges, and nursing home staff turnover rates are particularly high. Empirical evidence on the association between turnover and quality of care is limited and has typically relied on low-quality measures of turnover, small and selected samples of facilities, and comparisons across facilities that are highly susceptible to residual confounding.
To quantify the association between nursing home staff turnover and quality of care using within-facility variation over time in reliable turnover measures available for virtually all US nursing homes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study, data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on health inspection citations and quality measures at US nursing homes were combined with turnover measures constructed from daily staffing payroll data for quarter 2 of 2017 (April 1 to June 30) to quarter 4 of 2019 (October 1 to December 31), covering 1.06 billion shifts for 7.48 million employment relationships at 15 869 facilities. A 2-way fixed-effects design was used to estimate the association between staff turnover (direct care nursing staff and administrators) and quality-of-care outcomes based on how the same facility performed differently in times of low and high turnover. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to August 2023.
Facility turnover, defined as the share of hours worked in a period by staff hired within the last 90 days.
Number, type, scope, and severity of health inspection citations, overall health inspection scores, and Nursing Home Compare quality measures.
The study sample included 1.45 million facility-weeks between April 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, corresponding to 13 826 unique facilities. During an average facility-week, 15.0% of nursing staff and 11.6% of administrators were new hires due to recent turnover. After both administrator turnover and the overall staffing level were controlled for, an additional 10 percentage points in nursing staff turnover in the 2 weeks before a health inspection was associated with an additional 0.241 (95% CI, 0.084-0.399) citations in that inspection, compared with a mean of 5.98 citations. An additional 10 percentage points in nursing staff turnover was associated with a mean decrease of 0.035 (95% CI, 0.023-0.047) SDs in assessment-based quality measures and 0.020 (95% CI, 0.001-0.038) SDs in claims-based quality measures, with the strongest associations found for measures related to patient functioning.
Within-facility variation in staff turnover was associated with decreased quality of care. These findings suggest that efforts to monitor and reduce staff turnover may be able to improve patient outcomes.
医护人员的流动可能会扰乱患者护理,并带来运营和组织方面的挑战,而养老院员工的流动率尤其高。关于流动率与护理质量之间关联的实证证据有限,并且通常依赖于流动率的低质量衡量标准、设施的小样本和选定样本,以及设施之间的比较,这些比较非常容易受到残余混杂因素的影响。
利用几乎所有美国养老院都可用的可靠流动率衡量标准,在设施内随时间变化的情况下,量化养老院员工流动率与护理质量之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:在这项横断面研究中,将美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)关于健康检查引文和护理质量的信息与 2017 年第二季度(4 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日)至 2019 年第四季度(10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日)的日常人员配置工资单数据中构建的流动率衡量标准相结合,覆盖了 15869 个设施的 748 万名员工关系的 10.6 亿个班次。使用双向固定效应设计,根据同一设施在低流动率和高流动率时期的表现不同,估计员工流动率(直接护理护理人员和管理人员)与护理质量结果之间的关联。数据分析于 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 8 月进行。
设施流动率,定义为在过去 90 天内雇用的员工在一个时期内工作的时间份额。
健康检查引文的数量、类型、范围和严重程度,整体健康检查评分,以及养老院比较质量措施。
研究样本包括 2017 年 4 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间的 145 万设施周,对应于 13826 个独特的设施。在平均设施周内,由于最近的流动,15.0%的护理人员和 11.6%的管理人员是新招聘的。在控制管理员流动率和整体人员配备水平后,与平均 5.98 条引文相比,在健康检查前两周内护理人员流动率增加 10 个百分点,与该检查中额外的 0.241(95%置信区间,0.084-0.399)条引文相关。护理人员流动率增加 10 个百分点,与评估为基础的质量措施平均减少 0.035(95%置信区间,0.023-0.047)标准差和索赔为基础的质量措施减少 0.020(95%置信区间,0.001-0.038)标准差相关,与与患者功能相关的措施相关性最强。
员工流动率的设施内变化与护理质量下降有关。这些发现表明,监测和减少员工流动率的努力可能能够改善患者的预后。