Suppr超能文献

城乡森林恢复的科学与实践的趋同与分歧。

Convergence and divergence in science and practice of urban and rural forest restoration.

机构信息

Laboratory of Ecology and Forest Restoration (LERF), Department of Biological Sciences, 'Luiz de Queiroz' College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, 11, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.

Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.

出版信息

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024 Feb;99(1):295-312. doi: 10.1111/brv.13022. Epub 2023 Oct 9.

Abstract

Forest restoration has never been higher on policymakers' agendas. Complex and multi-dimensional arrangements across the urban-rural continuum challenge restorationists and require integrative approaches to strengthen environmental protection and increase restoration outcomes. It remains unclear if urban and rural forest restoration are moving towards or away from each other in practice and research, and whether comparing research outcomes can help stakeholders to gain a clearer understanding of the interconnectedness between the two fields. This study aims to identify the challenges and opportunities for enhancing forest restoration in both urban and rural systems by reviewing the scientific evidence, engaging with key stakeholders and using an urban-rural forest restoration framework. Using the Society for Ecological Restoration's International Principles as discussion topics, we highlight aspects of convergence and divergence between the two fields to broaden our understanding of forest restoration and promote integrative management approaches to address future forest conditions. Our findings reveal that urban and rural forest restoration have convergent and divergent aspects. We emphasise the importance of tailoring goals and objectives to specific contexts and the need to design different institutions and incentives based on the social and ecological needs and goals of stakeholders in different regions. Additionally, we discuss the challenges of achieving high levels of ecological restoration and the need to go beyond traditional ecology to plan, implement, monitor, and adaptively manage restored forests. We suggest that rivers and watersheds could serve as a common ground linking rural and urban landscapes and that forest restoration could interact with other environmental protection measures. We note the potential for expanding the creative vision associated with increasing tree-containing environments in cities to generate more diverse and resilient forest restoration outcomes in rural settings. This study underscores the value of integrative management approaches in addressing future forest conditions across the urban-rural continuum. Our framework provides valuable insights for policymakers, researchers, and decision-makers to advance the field of forest restoration and address the challenges of restoration across the urban-rural continuum. The rural-urban interface serves as a convergence point for forest restoration, and both urban and rural fields can benefit from each other's expertise.

摘要

森林恢复从未像现在这样成为政策制定者议程上的重中之重。城乡连续体中复杂多样的安排给恢复工作者带来了挑战,需要采取综合方法来加强环境保护和提高恢复成果。目前尚不清楚城市和农村森林恢复在实践和研究中是趋同还是趋异,以及比较研究成果是否有助于利益相关者更清楚地了解这两个领域之间的相互联系。本研究旨在通过审查科学证据、与主要利益相关者接触并使用城乡森林恢复框架,确定加强城乡系统森林恢复的挑战和机遇。我们使用社会生态恢复学会的国际原则作为讨论主题,突出了这两个领域之间的趋同和分歧方面,以拓宽我们对森林恢复的理解,并促进综合管理方法来应对未来的森林状况。我们的研究结果表明,城市和农村森林恢复既有趋同之处,也有不同之处。我们强调了根据具体情况调整目标和目的的重要性,以及根据不同地区利益相关者的社会和生态需求和目标,设计不同机构和激励措施的必要性。此外,我们讨论了实现高水平生态恢复的挑战,以及需要超越传统生态学,规划、实施、监测和自适应管理恢复后的森林。我们认为,河流和流域可以作为将农村和城市景观联系起来的共同基础,森林恢复可以与其他环境保护措施相互作用。我们注意到,在城市中增加树木环境的创造性愿景有可能在农村地区产生更多样化和更有弹性的森林恢复成果。本研究强调了城乡连续体中综合管理方法在应对未来森林状况方面的价值。我们的框架为政策制定者、研究人员和决策者提供了有价值的见解,以推进森林恢复领域的发展,并应对城乡连续体中恢复的挑战。城乡界面是森林恢复的交汇点,城市和农村领域都可以从彼此的专业知识中受益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验