Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Mosul University, Mosul, Iraq.
Evid Based Dent. 2023 Dec;24(4):181-183. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00938-9. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Electronic search included PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to March 2022 using appropriate keywords.
The review included all observational studies (case-control, cohort and cross-sectional studies) published in English after 2000, comparing the prevalence of dry socket between smokers and non-smokers after simple or surgical tooth extraction. Exclusion criteria included patients with other post-extraction complications, prevalence of different risk factors, and unrelated study designs (literature reviews, case reports, expert opinion, and conference reports).
Two independent investigators screened the records (by title, abstract, and full text), and selected the eligible studies according to the predefined criteria. Collected data from each study included author name and country, year of publication, gender and age of patients, smoking status, inclusion and exclusion criteria, medical history and oral hygiene, prevalence of dry socket, type of tooth and extraction technique, symptoms and treatment. Risk of bias was assessed according to the (NHLBI, NIH) Quality Assessment Tool For Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies, while the level of evidence was assessed using the classification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels for diagnosis. Two independent reviewers conducted the assessments, and any disagreements were addressed through discussion.
Eleven studies from ten different countries representing a total of 10,195 patients (3007 smokers and 7188 non-smokers) were included in the final analysis. Nine studies were classified as having "good" quality and two as "intermediate," while all of the studies have the third or fourth level of evidence (through 5-graded scale). The prevalence of dry socket in smokers was about 13.2% (95% CI: 5.8-23.1%) and in non-smokers about 3.8% (95% CI: 2.1-6.0%). Meta-analysis showed that regular tobacco smoking was associated a more than 3-fold increase in the odds of dry socket after tooth extraction.
Despite heterogeneity among the included studies (different age groups and types of teeth extracted), there was a consistent association between cigarette smoking and an elevated risk of developing dry socket post tooth extraction.
观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
电子检索包括 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库,检索时间截至 2022 年 3 月,使用了适当的关键词。
综述纳入了 2000 年后发表的所有观察性研究(病例对照、队列和横断面研究),比较了单纯拔牙或手术拔牙后吸烟者和非吸烟者干槽症的发生率。排除标准包括有其他拔牙后并发症的患者、不同危险因素的发生率以及无关的研究设计(文献综述、病例报告、专家意见和会议报告)。
两名独立的研究者筛选了记录(通过标题、摘要和全文),并根据预先确定的标准选择了合格的研究。从每项研究中收集的数据包括作者姓名和国家、发表年份、患者的性别和年龄、吸烟状况、纳入和排除标准、病史和口腔卫生、干槽症的发生率、牙齿类型和拔牙技术、症状和治疗。根据(NHLBI、NIH)观察性队列和横断面研究质量评估工具评估偏倚风险,同时使用牛津循证医学中心诊断分级对证据水平进行评估。两名独立的评审员进行评估,如有任何分歧,通过讨论解决。
最终分析纳入了来自 10 个不同国家的 11 项研究,共 10195 名患者(3007 名吸烟者和 7188 名非吸烟者)。9 项研究被归类为“良好”质量,2 项为“中等”质量,所有研究的证据水平均为第 3 或第 4 级(通过 5 级评分量表)。吸烟者干槽症的发生率约为 13.2%(95%CI:5.8-23.1%),非吸烟者约为 3.8%(95%CI:2.1-6.0%)。荟萃分析显示,经常吸烟与拔牙后干槽症的风险增加 3 倍以上有关。
尽管纳入的研究存在异质性(不同的年龄组和拔牙类型),但吸烟与拔牙后干槽症风险增加之间存在一致的关联。