Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 大流行期间的患者代表性斗争:有弹性的医疗体系错失机会。

The patient representation struggle during the COVID-19 pandemic: Missed opportunities for resilient healthcare systems.

机构信息

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Zorgbelang Inclusief, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13877. doi: 10.1111/hex.13877. Epub 2023 Oct 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of patient participation and representation during crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, has been under-researched. Existing studies paint a pessimistic picture of patient representation during the pandemic. However, there are indications that patient representatives have adapted to the new situation and can contribute to the resilience of healthcare systems. This paper aims to further explore the potential contribution of patient representatives for healthcare system resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

The study used a qualitative approach. We conducted a thematic analysis on the following data: interviews with client council members (n = 32) and representatives from patient organizations (n = 6) and focus groups (n = 2) to investigate patient representation on both the national policy level and organizational level in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

We identified the crisis discourse, the dependent position, the diversity of patient perspectives and the layered decision-making structure as themes that help to understand what made patient representation in pandemic times a struggle for national and local patient representatives. The analysis of the subjects these representatives put forward during decision-making shows that their input can play an important role in broadening discussions, challenging decisions, and suggesting alternatives during a crisis. We identified several strategies (e.g., collaborating with other actors, proactively putting subjects on the policy agenda, finding new ways of contacting their 'constituency') used by the patient representatives studied to exert influence despite the difficulties encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

The struggle for patient representation during pandemic decision-making is a missed opportunity for resilient healthcare systems as these representatives can play a role in opening up discussions and putting different perspectives to the fore. Moreover, the adaptive strategies used by representatives to influence decision-making offer lessons for future representation activities. However, adaptations to the crisis decision-making structure are also needed to enable patient representatives to play their role.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

We conducted interviews with patient representatives and discussed our preliminary findings with patient representatives during the focus groups. Zorgbelang, a patient organization supporting client councils and enabling and organizing patient participation for organizations and municipalities, was partner in this research and contributed to the interview guide, conducting interviews and focus groups. Additionally, the analysis made by the first author was discussed and refined multiple times with the partners of Zorgbelang and one of them co-authored this paper.

摘要

背景

在危机期间,如 COVID-19 大流行期间,患者参与和代表的作用尚未得到充分研究。现有研究对大流行期间患者代表的情况描绘得较为悲观。然而,有迹象表明,患者代表已经适应了新情况,并能够为医疗保健系统的弹性做出贡献。本文旨在进一步探讨在 COVID-19 大流行期间,患者代表对医疗保健系统弹性的潜在贡献。

方法

本研究采用定性方法。我们对以下数据进行了主题分析:对客户委员会成员(n=32)和患者组织代表(n=6)的访谈以及焦点小组(n=2),以调查荷兰在国家政策层面和组织层面的患者代表情况。

结果

我们确定了危机话语、从属地位、患者观点的多样性和分层决策结构,这些主题有助于理解是什么使得大流行时期的患者代表工作成为国家和地方患者代表的一项挑战。对这些代表在决策中提出的主题的分析表明,他们的意见可以在危机期间发挥重要作用,扩大讨论、挑战决策并提出替代方案。我们确定了研究中的患者代表所使用的几种策略(例如,与其他行为者合作、主动将主题纳入政策议程、寻找联系其“选民”的新方法),尽管遇到了困难,但这些策略仍能发挥影响力。

结论

在大流行决策期间争取患者代表是具有弹性的医疗保健系统的一个错失的机会,因为这些代表可以在开放讨论和突出不同观点方面发挥作用。此外,代表们为影响决策而采用的适应性策略为未来的代表活动提供了经验教训。然而,还需要对危机决策结构进行调整,以使患者代表能够发挥作用。

患者贡献

我们对患者代表进行了访谈,并在焦点小组中与患者代表讨论了我们的初步发现。Zorgbelang 是一家支持客户委员会并为组织和市政当局提供和组织患者参与的患者组织,是这项研究的合作伙伴,为访谈指南提供了意见,进行了访谈和焦点小组。此外,第一作者的分析多次与 Zorgbelang 的合作伙伴进行了讨论和完善,其中一位合作伙伴共同撰写了本文。

相似文献

6
Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: the Dutch model.患者参与集体医疗决策:荷兰模式。
Health Expect. 2010 Mar;13(1):73-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00567.x. Epub 2009 Aug 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验