• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of middle ear function after conventional or endoscopic microdebrider assisted adenoidectomy.评估传统或内镜下微动力辅助腺样体切除术对中耳功能的影响。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023 Dec;43(6):417-423. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2593. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
2
Comparison between curettage adenoidectomy and endoscopic-assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy in terms of Eustachian tube dysfunction.经比较,腺样体刮除术与内镜辅助微动力切割术治疗咽鼓管功能障碍的疗效。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jan-Feb;86(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
3
A Prospective Comparative Study of Impedance Audiometry Findings Preoperatively and Postoperatively in Cases of Conventional Adenoidectomy versus Microdebrider Assisted Adenoidectomy.传统腺样体切除术与微型切割器辅助腺样体切除术病例术前和术后阻抗测听结果的前瞻性对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):4019-4024. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04769-7. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Comparison of middle ear function and hearing thresholds in children with adenoid hypertrophy after microdebrider and conventional adenoidectomy: a randomised controlled trial.微型切割器与传统腺样体切除术治疗腺样体肥大患儿的中耳功能及听力阈值比较:一项随机对照试验
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov;277(11):3195-3203. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06197-z. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
5
Curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy in children: A randomized controlled trial.儿童刮除术腺样体切除术与内镜下微切割器腺样体切除术的随机对照试验
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Apr;119:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
6
Different techniques of adenoidectomy and its impact on middle ear pressure: a randomized controlled study.腺样体切除术的不同技术及其对中耳压力的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jan;281(1):379-385. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08188-2. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
7
How we do it: a combined method of traditional curette and power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy.我们的做法:传统刮匙与电动辅助内镜下腺样体切除术相结合的方法。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 May;129(5):556-9. doi: 10.1080/00016480802294377.
8
A comparative study of two adenoidectomy technics for efficacy and safety: Conventional curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy.两种腺样体切除术技术的疗效和安全性比较研究:传统刮除腺样体切除术与内镜下微动力系统切除术的比较。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Jul-Aug;44(4):103807. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103807. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
9
Endoscopic-assisted versus curettage adenoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with objective outcome measures.内镜辅助与刮除腺样体切除术的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,具有客观的结局指标。
Laryngoscope. 2010 Sep;120(9):1895-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.21045.
10
Comparative Study Between Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy Versus Endoscopic Microdebrider Assisted Adenoidectomy: Our Experience.传统刮除腺样体切除术与内镜下微型切割器辅助腺样体切除术的比较研究:我们的经验
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):875-880. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01944-4. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of combined tympanostomy tube insertion and adenoidectomy in the treatment of otitis media with effusion in children.鼓膜置管联合腺样体切除术治疗儿童分泌性中耳炎的疗效
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Dec;40(11):2577-2582. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.11.10713.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic Adenoidectomy Replacing the Outdated Curette Adenoidectomy: Comparison of the Two Methods at a Tertiary Care Centre.内镜下腺样体切除术取代过时的刮匙腺样体切除术:三级医疗中心两种方法的比较
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):4788-4794. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03089-y. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
2
Comparison of Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy Versus Endoscopic Powered Adenoidectomy: A Randomised Single-Blind Study.传统刮除腺样体切除术与内镜动力腺样体切除术的比较:一项随机单盲研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):1044-1049. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02122-2. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
3
Endoscopic adenoidectomy: a systematic analysis of outcomes and complications in 1006 patients.内镜下腺样体切除术:1006例患者的结局与并发症的系统分析
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2020 Feb;40(1):79-86. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N0150.
4
Endoscopic assisted powered adenoidectomy versus conventional adenoidectomy - a randomised controlled trial.内镜辅助动力腺样体切除术与传统腺样体切除术的随机对照试验
J Laryngol Otol. 2019 Apr;133(4):289-293. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119000550.
5
Conventional Versus Endoscopic Powered Adenoidectomy: A Comparative Study.传统腺样体切除术与内镜动力腺样体切除术:一项比较研究。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2009 Oct;65(4):308-12. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80089-0. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
6
Twenty-four years of powered endoscopic nasal polypectomy.动力性鼻内镜下鼻息肉切除术24年回顾
Ear Nose Throat J. 2016 Jun;95(6):206-8. doi: 10.1177/014556131609500601.
7
Oral steroids for the resolution of otitis media with effusion (OME) in children (OSTRICH): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.儿童中耳积液(OME)口服类固醇药物治疗(鸵鸟研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Mar 1;17(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1236-1.
8
Audiological Outcome of Classical Adenoidectomy versus Endoscopically-Assisted Adenoidectomy using a Microdebrider.传统腺样体切除术与使用微型切割器的内镜辅助腺样体切除术的听力结果比较
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;28(84):31-7.
9
Comparison of transoral power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy to curettage adenoidectomy.经口动力辅助内镜腺样体切除术与刮除腺样体切除术的比较。
Adv Ther. 2012 Aug;29(8):708-21. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0036-6. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
10
Adenoidectomy for otitis media in children.儿童中耳炎的腺样体切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD007810. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007810.pub2.

评估传统或内镜下微动力辅助腺样体切除术对中耳功能的影响。

Assessment of middle ear function after conventional or endoscopic microdebrider assisted adenoidectomy.

机构信息

Department of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023 Dec;43(6):417-423. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2593. Epub 2023 Oct 10.

DOI:10.14639/0392-100X-N2593
PMID:37814977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10773544/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare pre- and post-operative pure tone audiometric and impedance audiometric analysis following conventional and endoscopic microdebrider assisted adenoidectomy and compare the outcomes.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with chronic adenoiditis were divided in groups of 25 each. Patients in the first group underwent conventional curettage adenoidectomy, while those in second group underwent endoscopic microdebrider assisted adenoidectomy. Pre- and post-operative pure tone and impedance audiometry were performed for all patients and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The endoscopic microdebrider assisted method resulted in significantly better outcomes compared to conventional curettage. Criteria such as hearing threshold (p value 0.004 at second follow-up), peak pressure (p value 0.045 at first follow-up) and tympanogram (p value 0.016) showed that the endoscopic method was better, while peak compliance (p value 0.340 at first follow-up) did not show any significant difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic microdebrider assisted method for adenoidectomy has a definite advantage of better visualisation resulting in better clearance of tissue, leading to enhanced middle ear function compared to conventional curettage.

摘要

目的

比较传统和内镜微动力辅助腺样体切除术前后纯音测听和阻抗测听分析,并比较结果。

方法

将诊断为慢性腺样体炎的患者分为每组 25 例。第一组患者接受传统刮除腺样体切除术,第二组患者接受内镜微动力辅助腺样体切除术。对所有患者进行术前和术后纯音测听和阻抗测听,并比较结果。

结果

与传统刮除相比,内镜微动力辅助方法的结果明显更好。听力阈值(第二次随访时 p 值为 0.004)、峰值压力(第一次随访时 p 值为 0.045)和鼓室图(p 值为 0.016)等标准表明内镜方法更好,而峰值顺应性(第一次随访时 p 值为 0.340)在两组之间无显著差异。

结论

与传统刮除相比,内镜微动力辅助腺样体切除术具有更好的可视化优势,可更彻底地清除组织,从而改善中耳功能。