Scientific Research & Strategy, Aetion Inc., Boston, MA 02109, USA.
Scientific Research & Strategy, Aetion Inc., New York, NY 10001, USA.
J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Nov;12(11):e230125. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0125. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
To evaluate the availability of published comparative real-world evidence (RWE) studies in Medicare patients for the ten drugs set to undergo Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) price negotiations in 2026. A scoping review was completed in MEDLINE/PubMed to evaluate the availability of comparative RWE investigations conducted among Medicare-eligible patient populations in the US for the following drugs: apixaban, rivaroxaban, sitagliptin, ibrutinib, empagliflozin, etanercept, dapagliflozin, sacubitril/valsartan, ustekinumab and insulin aspart. Of the 170 real-world comparative studies identified, 55 (32.4%) used Medicare real-world data (RWD) while 34 (20.0%) used commercial claims data in conjunction with either Medicare Advantage or Medicare Supplementary databases. The number of studies varied considerably by drug with apixaban and rivaroxaban studies accounting for the majority (i.e., 67.1%) of comparative RWE studies. Approximately a third or less of the comparative RWE studies were conducted in CMS RWD per drug. Our results demonstrate there is a considerable amount of comparative RWE for apixaban, rivaroxaban, and etanercept but limited comparative RWE for the other drugs set to undergo CMS price negotiations in 2026; additionally, our findings set up a number of next steps (e.g., risk of bias assessments) for further exploration of the available evidence base. Overall, CMS and manufacturers should consider proactively generating high-quality comparative RWE studies in the Medicare population to ensure that future price negotiations are based on robust evidence.
评估在 2026 年将接受医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)价格谈判的十种药物中,有多少已发表的比较真实世界证据(RWE)研究可用于医疗保险患者。在 MEDLINE/PubMed 中进行了范围界定审查,以评估在美国符合医疗保险条件的患者人群中进行的以下药物的比较 RWE 研究的可用性:阿哌沙班、利伐沙班、西格列汀、伊布替尼、恩格列净、依那西普、达格列净、沙库巴曲缬沙坦、乌司奴单抗和门冬胰岛素。在确定的 170 项真实世界比较研究中,有 55 项(32.4%)使用了医疗保险真实世界数据(RWD),而 34 项(20.0%)使用了商业索赔数据,并结合了医疗保险优势或补充数据库。每个药物的研究数量差异很大,阿哌沙班和利伐沙班的研究占比较 RWE 研究的大多数(即 67.1%)。每种药物的比较 RWE 研究中,约有三分之一或更少是在 CMS RWD 中进行的。我们的研究结果表明,阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和依那西普有相当数量的比较 RWE,但 2026 年将接受 CMS 价格谈判的其他药物的比较 RWE 有限;此外,我们的发现为进一步探索现有证据基础设定了一些后续步骤(例如,偏倚风险评估)。总体而言,CMS 和制造商应考虑在 Medicare 人群中主动生成高质量的比较 RWE 研究,以确保未来的价格谈判基于可靠的证据。