Schaefer K, von Herrath D, Hüfler M, Pauls A
Int J Artif Organs. 1986 Jul;9(4):247-50.
The occurrence of fever during various blood purification methods was evaluated in a retrospective study. It could be demonstrated, that patients treated chronically by conventional hemodialysis experience six times more febrile episodes than patients on chronic hemofiltration (4.84% versus 0.81%). Since many of the increased temperatures could not be explained by conventional means, it has to be assumed that the treatment itself caused the fever, possibly activating the monocyte hormone interleukin 1. It is of further note that there was no difference in the magnitude of the temperature due to septicaemia or to no obvious cause. This finding necessitates in our opinion an early antibiotic therapy in those cases where fever develops without clear explanation.
在一项回顾性研究中评估了各种血液净化方法期间发热的发生情况。结果表明,接受传统血液透析长期治疗的患者发生发热性发作的次数是接受慢性血液滤过患者的六倍(4.84% 对 0.81%)。由于许多体温升高无法用传统方法解释,因此必须假定治疗本身导致了发热,可能是激活了单核细胞激素白细胞介素 1。还需注意的是,由败血症或无明显原因引起的体温升高幅度没有差异。我们认为,这一发现使得在发热原因不明的情况下有必要尽早进行抗生素治疗。