Costa Paulo Victor de Moura, Firmiano Tainah Costa, Borges Gilberto Antônio, Dantas Rodrigo Pereira, Veríssimo Crisnicaw
Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Department of Dental Materials and Restorative Dentistry, University of Uberaba, Uberaba, Brazil.
Dent Traumatol. 2024 Apr;40(2):204-212. doi: 10.1111/edt.12896. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Mouthguards are used to prevent dental trauma and orofacial injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) aging by thermocycling on elastic modulus, stress, strain and shock absorption ability of different ethylene-vinyl acetate brands used for mouthguards.
Thirty EVA samples with a dimension of 70 × 10 × 3 mm were obtained from four commercial brands (Bioart®, Erkodent®, Polyshok® and Proform®). Fifteen samples were submitted to 10,000 cycles (5°C-55°C) in a thermocycling machine with an immersion time of 30 s and a transfer time of 5 s. The samples were submitted to a uniaxial tensile test in a universal testing machine to calculate the elastic modulus. Data were statistically evaluated by two-way ANOVA and Holm-Sidak test. A three-dimensional model of the anterior maxilla was created using Rhinoceros 5.0. A 3 mm custom-fitted mouthguard was simulated. The three-dimensional volumetric mesh was generated using the Patran software (MSC Software) with isoparametrics, 4-noded tetrahedral elements and exported to Marc/Mentat (MSC Software) as element number 134. A non-linear dynamic impact analysis was performed in which a rigid object struck the central incisor at a speed of 5 m/s. The stresses were evaluated by the modified von Mises criteria and the strains were also recorded.
Statistically significant differences were observed for elastic modulus values (p < .001). Mean and standard deviation values (MPa) without thermocycling were: Bioart (34.5 ± 0.9), Erkodent (15.0 ± 0.4), Polyshok (17.3 ± 0.4), Proform: (20.6 ± 0.8); and with thermocycling: Bioart (25.4 ± 0.8), Erkodent (10.7 ± 0.5), Polyshok (13.3 ± 0.6), Proform (13.1 ± 0.6). The thermocycling process reduced stress and strain levels regardless of the mouthguard materials. Shock absorption ability calculated based on the strain values was increased with thermocycling process.
The thermocycling process, regardless of the commercial brand, reduced the stress/strain and increased the shock absorption ability of mouthguards.
背景/目的:护齿器用于预防牙齿创伤和口腔颌面部损伤。本研究的目的是评估通过热循环对乙烯-醋酸乙烯酯(EVA)进行老化处理后,其对用于制作护齿器的不同品牌乙烯-醋酸乙烯酯的弹性模量、应力、应变和减震能力的影响。
从四个商业品牌(Bioart®、Erkodent®、Polyshok®和Proform®)获取30个尺寸为70×10×3mm的EVA样本。15个样本在热循环试验机中进行10000次循环(5°C - 55°C),浸泡时间为30秒,转移时间为5秒。样本在万能试验机上进行单轴拉伸试验以计算弹性模量。数据通过双向方差分析和霍尔姆-西达克检验进行统计学评估。使用Rhinoceros 5.0创建上颌前部的三维模型。模拟一个3mm定制贴合的护齿器。使用Patran软件(MSC Software)生成三维体积网格,采用等参、4节点四面体单元,并作为单元编号134导出到Marc/Mentat(MSC Software)。进行非线性动态冲击分析,其中一个刚性物体以5m/s的速度撞击中切牙。通过修正的冯·米塞斯准则评估应力,并记录应变。
观察到弹性模量值存在统计学显著差异(p <.001)。无热循环时的均值和标准差(MPa)为:Bioart(34.5±0.9)、Erkodent(15.0±0.4)、Polyshok(17.3±0.4)、Proform:(20.6±0.8);有热循环时为:Bioart(25.4±0.8)、Erkodent(10.7±0.5)、Polyshok(13.3±0.6)、Proform(13.1±0.6)。无论护齿器材料如何,热循环过程都会降低应力和应变水平。基于应变值计算的减震能力随热循环过程而增加。
无论商业品牌如何,热循环过程都会降低护齿器的应力/应变并提高其减震能力。