• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微波消融治疗肾细胞癌的技术、肿瘤学和安全性结局的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。

An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Technical, Oncologic, and Safety Outcomes of Microwave Ablation in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma.

机构信息

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2023 Dec;37(12):1314-1330. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0342. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1089/end.2023.0342
PMID:37819699
Abstract

Percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a new energy modality for percutaneous renal tumor ablation with potential advantages over radiofrequency and cryoablation. The goal of our study was to determine MWA outcomes for suspicious renal masses, with a subset analysis for biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and larger (T1b) tumors. Studies reporting outcomes of MWA for RCC were identified. Random-effects models with inverse-variance weighting were used to pool outcomes, including technical success rate (TSR), technical efficacy rate (TER), local recurrence rate (LRR), cancer-specific survival rate (CSSR), overall survival rate (OSR), and complications. Among 914 studies captured, 27 studies with 1584 patients (1683 malignant renal tumors) were included. The pooled TSR and TER were 99.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.0%-100%) and 96.2% (95% CI, 93.8%-98.2%). The pooled LRR was 3.2% (95% CI, 1.9%-4.7%). At 1, 3, and 5 years, the pooled CSSRs were 100% (95% CI, 99.4%-100%), 100% (95% CI, 98.4%-100%), and 97.7% (95% CI, 94.5%-99.7%), while pooled OSRs were 99.0% (95% CI, 97.5%-99.9%), 96.0% (95% CI, 93.1%-98.3%), and 88.1% (95% CI, 80.3%-94.2%). The pooled minor and major complication rates were 10.3% (95% CI, 7.1%-13.9%) and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.3%-2.1%). In 204 patients with 208 T1b tumors, the pooled TSR and TER were 100% (95% CI, 96.6%-100%) and 85.2% (95% CI, 71.0%-95.8%). The pooled LRR was 4.2% (95% CI, 0.9%-8.9%). At 1, 3, and 5 years, the pooled CSSRs were 98.2% (95% CI, 88.7%-100%), 97.2% (95% CI, 78.5%-100%), and 98.1% (95% CI, 72.3%-100%). At 1 and 3 years, the pooled OSRs were 94.3% (95% CI, 85.7%-99.6%) and 89.3% (95% CI, 68.7%-100%). The pooled minor and major complication rates were 14.8% (95% CI, 7.4%-23.8%) and 2.6% (95% CI, 0%-7.8%). MWA demonstrated favorable short- to intermediate-term oncologic outcomes with low complication rates, including in the T1b subset, with moderate quality of data and heterogeneity of assessed outcomes. This supports MWA as a safe and effective treatment for RCC and a potential viable option for larger tumors.

摘要

经皮微波消融(MWA)作为一种新的经皮肾肿瘤消融能量方式已经出现,与射频和冷冻消融相比具有潜在优势。我们的研究目的是确定可疑肾肿块的 MWA 结果,其中包括经活检证实的肾细胞癌(RCC)和较大(T1b)肿瘤的亚组分析。 确定了报告 RCC 患者 MWA 结果的研究。使用具有倒数方差加权的随机效应模型对包括技术成功率(TSR)、技术有效率(TER)、局部复发率(LRR)、癌症特异性生存率(CSSR)、总生存率(OSR)和并发症在内的结果进行汇总。 在纳入的 914 项研究中,有 27 项研究(共 1584 例患者[1683 例恶性肾肿瘤])纳入分析。汇总的 TSR 和 TER 分别为 99.6%(95%置信区间[CI],98.0%-100%)和 96.2%(95%CI,93.8%-98.2%)。汇总的 LRR 为 3.2%(95%CI,1.9%-4.7%)。在 1、3 和 5 年时,汇总的 CSSR 分别为 100%(95%CI,99.4%-100%)、100%(95%CI,98.4%-100%)和 97.7%(95%CI,94.5%-99.7%),而汇总的 OSR 分别为 99.0%(95%CI,97.5%-99.9%)、96.0%(95%CI,93.1%-98.3%)和 88.1%(95%CI,80.3%-94.2%)。汇总的轻微和主要并发症发生率分别为 10.3%(95%CI,7.1%-13.9%)和 1.0%(95%CI,0.3%-2.1%)。在 204 例有 208 个 T1b 肿瘤的患者中,汇总的 TSR 和 TER 分别为 100%(95%CI,96.6%-100%)和 85.2%(95%CI,71.0%-95.8%)。汇总的 LRR 为 4.2%(95%CI,0.9%-8.9%)。在 1、3 和 5 年时,汇总的 CSSR 分别为 98.2%(95%CI,88.7%-100%)、97.2%(95%CI,78.5%-100%)和 98.1%(95%CI,72.3%-100%)。在 1 年和 3 年时,汇总的 OSR 分别为 94.3%(95%CI,85.7%-99.6%)和 89.3%(95%CI,68.7%-100%)。汇总的轻微和主要并发症发生率分别为 14.8%(95%CI,7.4%-23.8%)和 2.6%(95%CI,0%-7.8%)。 MWA 具有良好的短期至中期肿瘤学结果,并发症发生率低,包括 T1b 亚组,数据质量中等,评估结果存在异质性。这支持 MWA 作为 RCC 的安全有效的治疗方法,也是较大肿瘤的潜在可行选择。

相似文献

1
An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Technical, Oncologic, and Safety Outcomes of Microwave Ablation in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma.微波消融治疗肾细胞癌的技术、肿瘤学和安全性结局的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2023 Dec;37(12):1314-1330. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0342. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Microwave Ablation for Malignant Renal Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature Since 2012.微波消融治疗恶性肾肿瘤的疗效和安全性:2012 年以来文献的更新系统性回顾和荟萃分析。
Korean J Radiol. 2018 Sep-Oct;19(5):938-949. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.5.938. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
3
Microwave ablation of malignant renal tumours: intermediate-term results and usefulness of RENAL and mRENAL scores for predicting outcomes and complications.恶性肾肿瘤的微波消融:中期结果以及RENAL和mRENAL评分在预测结局和并发症方面的实用性
Med Oncol. 2017 May;34(5):97. doi: 10.1007/s12032-017-0948-8. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
4
Percutaneous microwave ablation of T1a and T1b renal cell carcinoma: short-term efficacy and complications with emphasis on tumor complexity and single session treatment.经皮微波消融治疗 T1a 和 T1b 期肾癌:短期疗效和并发症,重点关注肿瘤复杂性和单次治疗。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Jun;41(6):1203-11. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0776-x.
5
Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Histologically Proven T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma.经组织学证实的 T1 期肾细胞癌的经皮微波消融。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jul;43(7):1025-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02423-7. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
6
Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study Focusing Upon Long-Term Follow-Up of Oncologic Outcomes.经皮微波消融与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗 I 期肾细胞癌:一项关注长期肿瘤学结果的倾向匹配队列研究。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 May;47(5):573-582. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03695-z. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
7
A Comparison of Microwave Ablation and Cryoablation for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.微波消融与冷冻消融治疗肾细胞癌的比较:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Urology. 2023 Oct;180:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
8
Tumor location does not impact oncologic outcomes for percutaneous microwave ablation of clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma.肿瘤位置并不影响经皮微波消融治疗临床 T1a 期肾癌的肿瘤学结果。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Nov;29(11):6319-6329. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06121-y. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
9
Safety and efficacy of RFA versus MWA for T1a renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.RFA 与 MWA 治疗 T1a 期肾细胞癌的安全性和有效性:倾向评分分析。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Feb;33(2):1040-1049. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09110-w. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
10
US-guided percutaneous microwave ablation versus open radical nephrectomy for small renal cell carcinoma: intermediate-term results.超声引导经皮微波消融与开放性根治性肾切除术治疗小肾细胞癌:中期结果。
Radiology. 2014 Mar;270(3):880-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130275. Epub 2013 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision oncology: The role of minimally-invasive ablation therapy in the management of solid organ tumors.精准肿瘤学:微创消融治疗在实体器官肿瘤管理中的作用。
World J Radiol. 2025 Jan 28;17(1):98618. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.98618.
2
Comparing Oncologic Outcomes of Heat-Based Thermal Ablation and Cryoablation in Patients With T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Cohort Study From the SEER Database.基于 SEER 数据库的人群队列研究:比较 T1a 期肾细胞癌患者热消融与冷冻消融的肿瘤学结局。
Korean J Radiol. 2024 Dec;25(12):1061-1069. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0462. Epub 2024 Nov 3.
3
Proceedings from an international consensus meeting on ablation in urogenital diseases.
泌尿生殖系统疾病消融国际共识会议论文集
Insights Imaging. 2024 Nov 8;15(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01841-2.