Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (PPGFT) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Florianópolis, SC - Brasil.
Grupo de Pesquisa em Saúde Cardiovascular e Exercício (GEPCardio) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Florianópolis, SC - Brasil.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Oct 9;120(9):e20230086. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230086. eCollection 2023.
Although the Talk Test (TT) is a reliable and low-cost test, its use for aerobic exercise prescription is still limited.
To analyze the heart rate (HR) in the stages of the TT and at the peak of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) as a parameter to prescribe aerobic exercise compared with HR at the first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2) of cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).
Individuals with cardiovascular disease attended three assessment days: 1) anamnesis and CPET; 2) 6MWT; and 3) TT. One-way repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman's test were used to compare HR at VT1 and VT2 with HR at TT stages: last positive (TT+), first equivocal (TT±), and negative (TT-), and at the peak of the 6MWT. Pearson's or Spearman's test assessed correlations between HR at VTs, TT stages, and 6MWT. Statistical significance was set at 5%.
The study included 22 cardiac patients (13 men, 61 ± 8 years). HR at VT1 was similar to HR at TT+ (p = 0.987) and TT± (p = 0.154), and moderately correlated with TT+ (r = 0.479, p = 0.024). HR at VT2 was similar to TT- (p = 0.383), with a strong correlation (r = 0.757, p < 0.001). HR at the peak of the 6MWT was significantly different from HR at TT+, TT±, and VT1 (p = 0.001, p = 0.005, and p < 0.001, respectively) but similar to TT- (p = 0.68).
HR at TT+ and TT- reflect HR at VT1 and VT2, respectively, differently from 6MWT, which was similar only to VT2. TT may be an objective test to assist aerobic exercise prescription in cardiac rehabilitation.
尽管谈话测试(TT)是一种可靠且低成本的测试方法,但它在有氧运动处方中的应用仍然有限。
分析 TT 各阶段和 6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)峰值时的心率(HR),将其作为与心肺运动试验(CPET)中第一和第二通气阈值(VT1 和 VT2)时的 HR 相比,来制定有氧运动处方的参数。
心血管疾病患者参加了 3 天的评估:1)病史和 CPET;2)6MWT;3)TT。采用单向重复测量方差分析或 Friedman 检验比较 VT1 和 VT2 时的 HR 与 TT 各阶段的 HR:最后阳性(TT+)、首次不确定(TT±)和阴性(TT-)以及 6MWT 峰值。采用 Pearson 或 Spearman 检验评估 VT 时、TT 各阶段和 6MWT 时的 HR 之间的相关性。统计学意义设定为 5%。
本研究纳入了 22 名心脏患者(男 13 名,61±8 岁)。VT1 时的 HR 与 TT+(p=0.987)和 TT±(p=0.154)时的 HR 相似,与 TT+时的 HR 中度相关(r=0.479,p=0.024)。VT2 时的 HR 与 TT-(p=0.383)相似,相关性较强(r=0.757,p<0.001)。6MWT 峰值时的 HR 与 TT+、TT±和 VT1 时的 HR 有显著差异(p=0.001、p=0.005 和 p<0.001),但与 TT-时的 HR 相似(p=0.68)。
TT+和 TT-时的 HR 分别反映了 VT1 和 VT2 时的 HR,与 6MWT 不同,6MWT 仅与 VT2 相似。TT 可能是辅助心脏康复中有氧运动处方的客观测试。