Altern Ther Health Med. 2024 Jan;30(1):36-43.
This meta-analysis aimed to assess and evaluate the effect of nurse-led health management on the quality of life of patients with atrial fibrillation.
We compared the outcomes of patients who received nurse-led intervention during hospitalization with those who did not, using a systematic retrospective and randomized controlled trial (RCT) analysis. We searched the studies in Cochrane Central Register, including PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WAN Data, CBM, CNKI, etc. Bias risks included in the study were evaluated by Cochrane Bias risk tool , and combined risk estimates were calculated. The main endpoints are the SF-36 and HADS scores and endpoints after surgery. We used a random effects model to combine the data. For continuous variables (such as SF-36 and HADS scores), we used standard mean difference for analysis, and for binary variables (such as the presence or absence of mental health problems), we used hazard ratio for analysis. The data are based on fixed or stochastic effects models, with standard mean differences and risk ratios for continuous and heterotaxic variables.
3064 patients from 7 clinical studies were included in this meta-analysis. Postoperative SF-36 scores at 6 months in the nurse-led group were significantly higher than those in the routine nursing group in Role-Physical and Mental health. Postoperative SF-36 scores at 12 months in the nurse-led group were not significantly higher than those in the routine nursing group. The nurse-led group had a significantly lower HADS depression score than the conventional care group, but there was no significant difference in HADS anxiety score between the two groups.
The main findings of this meta-analysis are that the nurse-led comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation can significantly improve the role-physical and mental health status of SF-36, reduce the HADS depression score, the incidence of cardiovascular hospitalization and atrial fibrillation at 6 months atrial fibrillation surgery. Additional high-quality RCTs should be conducted in the future. nurse-led interventions have the potential to significantly impact the care of patients with atrial fibrillation. By providing comprehensive management, education, and support, nurses can improve patient outcomes, enhance quality of life, and reduce healthcare burdens for both patients and providers. While this meta-analysis provides valuable insights, there are limitations that should be considered. Standardizing interventions and outcome measures, conducting larger studies with longer follow-up periods, including diverse populations and settings, and assessing the economic impact of nurse-led interventions are potential directions for future research in this field. Addressing these limitations would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the role of nurse-led interventions in the care of patients with atrial fibrillation.
本荟萃分析旨在评估和评价护士主导的健康管理对心房颤动患者生活质量的影响。
我们通过系统回顾和随机对照试验(RCT)分析,比较了住院期间接受护士干预的患者和未接受护士干预的患者的结局。我们在 Cochrane 中心注册、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、WAN Data、CBM、CNKI 等研究中进行了检索。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估研究中的偏倚风险,并计算合并风险估计值。主要终点是 SF-36 和 HADS 评分以及术后终点。我们使用随机效应模型对数据进行合并。对于连续变量(如 SF-36 和 HADS 评分),我们使用标准均数差进行分析,对于二分类变量(如心理健康问题的存在或不存在),我们使用危险比进行分析。数据基于固定或随机效应模型,对于连续和异质变量,使用标准均数差和风险比。
7 项临床研究的 3064 名患者纳入本荟萃分析。护士主导组术后 6 个月的 SF-36 评分在角色-身体和精神健康方面明显高于常规护理组。护士主导组术后 12 个月的 SF-36 评分与常规护理组无显著差异。护士主导组的 HADS 抑郁评分明显低于常规护理组,但两组的 HADS 焦虑评分无显著差异。
本荟萃分析的主要发现是,心房颤动的护士主导综合管理可以显著改善 SF-36 的角色-身体和精神健康状况,降低 HADS 抑郁评分,降低 6 个月时心血管住院和心房颤动的发生率心房颤动手术后。未来应开展更多高质量的 RCT。护士主导的干预措施有可能对心房颤动患者的护理产生重大影响。通过提供全面的管理、教育和支持,护士可以改善患者的结局,提高生活质量,并减轻患者和提供者的医疗负担。虽然本荟萃分析提供了有价值的见解,但仍存在一些局限性,需要考虑。标准化干预措施和结局测量,开展更大规模、随访时间更长的研究,包括不同人群和环境,并评估护士主导干预措施的经济影响,这些都是该领域未来研究的潜在方向。解决这些局限性将有助于更全面地了解护士主导干预在心房颤动患者护理中的作用。