Cardiovascular Center Aalst, onze lieve vrouw Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McGovern Medical School at University of Texas Health and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Oct 9;16(19):2396-2408. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.018.
Low fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Hitherto, this assessment has been independent of the epicardial vessel interrogated.
This study sought to assess the predictive capacity of post-PCI FFR for target vessel failure (TVF) stratified by coronary artery.
We performed a systematic review and individual patient-level data meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies with protocol-recommended post-PCI FFR assessment. The difference in post-PCI FFR between left anterior descending (LAD) and non-LAD arteries was assessed using a random-effect models meta-analysis of mean differences. TVF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization.
Overall, 3,336 vessels (n = 2,760 patients) with post-PCI FFR measurements were included in 9 studies. The weighted mean post-PCI FFR was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.90) and differed significantly between coronary vessels (LAD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.88 vs non-LAD = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.94; P < 0.001). Post-PCI FFR was an independent predictor of TVF, with its risk increasing by 52% for every reduction of 0.10 FFR units, and this was mainly driven by TVR. The predictive capacity for TVF was poor for LAD arteries (AUC: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.58) and moderate for non-LAD arteries (AUC: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.59-0.73; LAD vs non-LAD arteries, P = 0.005).
The LAD is associated with a lower post-PCI FFR than non-LAD arteries, emphasizing the importance of interpreting post-PCI FFR on a vessel-specific basis. Although a higher post-PCI FFR was associated with improved prognosis, its predictive capacity for events differs between the LAD and non-LAD arteries, being poor in the LAD and moderate in the non-LAD vessels.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后低分数血流储备(FFR)与不良临床结局相关。迄今为止,这种评估是独立于被检查的心外膜血管进行的。
本研究旨在评估按冠状动脉分层的 PCI 后 FFR 对靶血管失败(TVF)的预测能力。
我们对随机临床试验和观察性研究进行了系统评价和个体患者水平数据荟萃分析,并对经方案推荐的 PCI 后 FFR 评估进行了荟萃分析。采用随机效应模型荟萃分析平均差来评估左前降支(LAD)和非 LAD 动脉间 PCI 后 FFR 的差异。TVF 定义为心脏死亡、靶血管心肌梗死和临床驱动的靶血管血运重建的综合结果。
共有 9 项研究纳入了 3336 支血管(n=2760 例患者)进行了 PCI 后 FFR 测量。加权平均 PCI 后 FFR 为 0.89(95%CI:0.87-0.90),且冠状动脉之间差异显著(LAD=0.86;95%CI:0.85 至 0.88 vs 非 LAD=0.93;95%CI:0.91-0.94;P<0.001)。PCI 后 FFR 是 TVF 的独立预测因子,每降低 0.10 FFR 单位,其风险增加 52%,而这主要是由 TVR 驱动的。LAD 动脉的 TVF 预测能力较差(AUC:0.52;95%CI:0.47-0.58),而非 LAD 动脉的预测能力中等(AUC:0.66;95%CI:0.59-0.73;LAD 与非 LAD 动脉,P=0.005)。
LAD 与非 LAD 动脉相比,PCI 后 FFR 较低,这强调了基于血管特异性解释 PCI 后 FFR 的重要性。虽然较高的 PCI 后 FFR 与预后改善相关,但 LAD 和非 LAD 动脉之间的事件预测能力存在差异,LAD 较差,非 LAD 中等。