Johnson Kendall A, Brannen Phillip M, Chen Chunxian, Bock Clive H
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Station, USDA-ARS, Byron, GA 31008.
Plant Dis. 2024 Apr;108(4):930-940. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-22-2669-RE. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
Phony peach disease (PPD), found predominantly in central and southern Georgia, is a re-emerging disease caused by (Xf) subsp. . Accurate detection and rapid removal of symptomatic trees are crucial to effective disease management. Currently, peach producers rely solely on visual identification of symptoms to confirm PPD, which can be ambiguous if early in development. We compared visual assessment to quantitative PCR (qPCR) for detecting Xf in 'Julyprince' in 2019 and 2020 (JP2019 and JP2020) and in 'Scarletprince' in 2020 (SP2020). With no prior knowledge of qPCR results, all trees in each orchard were assessed by a cohort of five experienced and five inexperienced raters in the morning and afternoon. Visual identification accuracy of PPD was variable, but experienced raters were more accurate when identifying PPD trees. In JP2019, the mean rater accuracy for experienced and inexperienced raters was 0.882 and 0.805, respectively. For JP2020, the mean rater accuracy for experienced and inexperienced raters was 0.914 and 0.816, respectively. For SP2020, the mean rater accuracy for experienced and inexperienced raters was 0.898 and 0.807, respectively. All raters had false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) observations, but experienced raters had significantly lower FN rates compared with the inexperienced group. Almost all raters overestimated the incidence of PPD in the orchards. Reliability of visual assessments was demonstrated as moderate to good, regardless of experience. Further research is needed to develop accurate and reliable methods of detection to aid management of PPD as both FPs and FNs are costly to peach production.
伪桃病(PPD)主要在佐治亚州中部和南部被发现,是一种由(Xf)亚种引起的再度出现的病害。准确检测并迅速移除有症状的树木对于有效的病害管理至关重要。目前,桃农完全依靠症状的目视识别来确认PPD,而在病害早期时这可能并不明确。我们在2019年和2020年对‘七月王子’(JP2019和JP2020)以及2020年对‘猩红王子’(SP2020)进行了目视评估与定量PCR(qPCR)检测Xf的比较。在不了解qPCR结果的情况下,每个果园的所有树木在上午和下午由一组五名经验丰富的评估员和五名经验不足的评估员进行评估。PPD的目视识别准确率各不相同,但经验丰富的评估员在识别PPD树木时更准确。在JP2019中,经验丰富和经验不足的评估员的平均评估准确率分别为0.882和0.805。对于JP2020,经验丰富和经验不足的评估员的平均评估准确率分别为0.914和0.816。对于SP2020,经验丰富和经验不足的评估员的平均评估准确率分别为0.898和0.807。所有评估员都有假阳性(FP)和假阴性(FN)观察结果,但经验丰富的评估员与经验不足的组相比,FN率显著更低。几乎所有评估员都高估了果园中PPD的发病率。无论经验如何,目视评估的可靠性被证明为中等至良好。由于FP和FN对桃生产都成本高昂,因此需要进一步研究以开发准确可靠的检测方法来辅助PPD的管理。