Fu Yuan, Gao Jie, Zuo Kun, Hua Cuncun, Yang Yixing, Liu Xinming, Xu Li, Lu Changlin, Su Pixiong, Zhang Dapeng
Heart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Kardiol Pol. 2023;81(11):1122-1129. doi: 10.33963/v.kp.97686. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
The optimal revascularization strategy for non-left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) lesions during one-stop hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) surgery lacks current evidence.
This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) strategies in patients with non-small non-LAD lesions undergoing one-stop HCR.
A total of 141 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD) undergoing one-stop HCR between June 1, 2018 and March 1, 2022 were retrospectively included in this study. In-hospital outcomes and mid-term major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were observed. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis was used to evaluate the MACCE-free survival rate. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify risk factors of mid-term MACCE.
Thirty-eight and 103 patients received only DCB or DES therapy, respectively, in this study. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics and laboratory parameters between the two groups. The in-hospital MACCE rate in the DES group was numerically higher than that in the DCB group (9.7% vs. 5.3%, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.4). The incidence of MACCE after patients' discharge was significantly higher in the DES group (22% vs. 5.3%, respectively, P = 0.02) during a median follow-up of 20 months. After multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, DCB therapy was independently associated with reduced risk of mid-term MACCE (hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.91; P = 0.04).
For patients with MVCAD undergoing one-stop HCR, DCB therapy may be the optimal revascularization strategy for non-small non-LAD coronary artery lesions with a significantly lower rate of mid-term MACCE.
一站式杂交冠状动脉血运重建术(HCR)中,非左前降支冠状动脉(LAD)病变的最佳血运重建策略目前缺乏证据。
本研究旨在比较一站式HCR治疗非小非LAD病变患者时,药物涂层球囊(DCB)和药物洗脱支架(DES)策略的疗效。
本研究回顾性纳入了2018年6月1日至2022年3月1日期间连续接受一站式HCR的141例多支冠状动脉疾病(MVCAD)患者。观察住院结局和中期主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE)。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线分析评估无MACCE生存率。采用Cox比例风险模型识别中期MACCE的危险因素。
本研究中,分别有38例和103例患者仅接受了DCB或DES治疗。两组间人口统计学特征和实验室参数无显著差异。DES组的住院MACCE发生率在数值上高于DCB组(分别为9.7%和5.3%),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.4)。在中位随访20个月期间,DES组患者出院后MACCE的发生率显著更高(分别为22%和5.3%,P = 0.02)。经过多变量Cox比例风险分析,DCB治疗与中期MACCE风险降低独立相关(风险比,0.21;95%置信区间,0.06 - 0.91;P = 0.04)。
对于接受一站式HCR的MVCAD患者,DCB治疗可能是非小非LAD冠状动脉病变的最佳血运重建策略,中期MACCE发生率显著更低。