Thorp H Holden
H. Holden Thorp Editor-in-Chief, Science journals.
Science. 2023 Oct 13;382(6667):135. doi: 10.1126/science.adl2369. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
As a long-time academic and university administrator in the United States, I've attended more meetings than I can remember about what "counts" toward faculty hiring, promotion, tenure, and other rewards at institutions of higher education. These meetings always followed a similar pattern- and sadly, still do. A wise colleague referred to these meetings as "Groundhog Day," after the movie about a single day that repeats over and over again. The process of assessing faculty success has not changed in about 70 years, despite a lot of talk to change things. Why can't universities break out of these ossified patterns?
作为一名长期在美国从事学术工作和担任大学管理人员的人,我参加过的关于高等教育机构教师招聘、晋升、终身教职及其他奖励中什么“算数”的会议多得数不清。这些会议总是遵循着相似的模式——可悲的是,如今依然如此。一位明智的同事将这些会议称为“土拨鼠日”,这一名称源自一部关于某一天不断重复的电影。尽管人们一直在谈论要做出改变,但评估教师成就的过程在大约70年里都没有变化。为什么大学无法摆脱这些僵化的模式呢?