Ting C T, Brin K P, Lin S J, Wang S P, Chang M S, Chiang B N, Yin F C
J Clin Invest. 1986 Dec;78(6):1462-71. doi: 10.1172/JCI112737.
Differences in aortic impedance between normotensives and hypertensives are not well characterized. We examined impedance in 8 normotensive and 11 hypertensive (mean 96.7 vs. 122.2 mmHg) age-matched, Chinese patients undergoing cardiac catheterization at rest, during nitroprusside, and handgrip exercise before and after beta blockade (propranolol). Hypertensives had higher resistance (2,295 vs. 1713 dyn-s/cm5), characteristic impedance (145.7 vs. 93.9 dyn-s/cm5), total external power (1,579 vs. 1174 mW), peripheral reflections (ratio of backward to forward wave components of 0.54 vs. 0.44), and first zero crossing of impedance phase angle (4.15 vs. 2.97 Hz). These abnormalities were eliminated with vasodilatation. Differences between groups were not further exacerbated when pressure was increased during handgrip exercise. Beta blockade further increased resistance and reflections. Thus, hemodynamic abnormalities of essential hypertension (increased resistance, reflections, and pulse wave velocity, and decreased compliance) are compatible with an increased vasomotor tone that is further unmasked during generalized beta blockade.
血压正常者与高血压患者之间主动脉阻抗的差异尚未得到充分描述。我们对8名血压正常和11名高血压(平均血压分别为96.7 mmHg和122.2 mmHg)且年龄匹配的中国患者进行了研究,这些患者在静息状态、使用硝普钠期间以及在β受体阻滞剂(普萘洛尔)前后进行握力运动时接受了阻抗检测。高血压患者具有更高的阻力(2295 vs. 1713 dyn-s/cm5)、特性阻抗(145.7 vs. 93.9 dyn-s/cm5)、总外部功率(1579 vs. 1174 mW)、外周反射(反向波与正向波分量的比值为0.54 vs. 0.44)以及阻抗相角的第一个零交叉点(4.15 vs. 2.97 Hz)。这些异常在血管扩张时消失。在握力运动期间压力升高时,两组之间的差异并未进一步加剧。β受体阻滞剂进一步增加了阻力和反射。因此,原发性高血压的血流动力学异常(阻力增加、反射增加、脉搏波速度增加以及顺应性降低)与血管运动张力增加相符,而在全身性β受体阻滞剂治疗期间这种异常会进一步显现出来。