Suppr超能文献

自然分娩与引产分娩产程曲线的比较。

Comparison of Labor Curves Between Spontaneous and Induced Labor.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia; and the Department of Business Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec 1;142(6):1416-1422. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005407. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the labor curve between individuals with induced labor and those undergoing spontaneous labor.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor database, including nulliparous and multiparous individuals with singleton vertex pregnancy who delivered vaginally after spontaneous labor or induction of labor at term. Labor that resulted in uterine rupture and neonates with a 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7, birth injury, or neonatal intensive care unit admission was excluded. We modeled the course of cervical dilation using repeated-measures analysis with a polynomial function. We compared traverse time , defined as the elapsed time between two given dilation measures, between induced and spontaneous labor using interval-censored regression.

RESULTS

Of 46,835 nulliparous individuals, 18,576 and 28,259 underwent induced and spontaneous labor, respectively. Of 77,503 multiparous individuals, 29,684 and 47,819 underwent induced and spontaneous labor, respectively. The start of the active phase on the labor curve was 6 cm in induced labor, regardless of parity. In nulliparous individuals, induced labor compared with spontaneous labor had a significantly shorter traverse time from 6 to 10 cm (median 1.8 hours [5th-95th percentile 0.4-8.6 hours] vs 2.3 hours [5th-95th percentile 0.6-9.4 hours]; P <.01). In multiparous individuals, induced labor compared with spontaneous labor had a significantly shorter traverse time from 6 to 10 cm (median 0.9 hours [5th-95th percentile 0.1-6.0 hours] vs 1.4 hours [5th-95th percentile 0.3-7.9 hours]; P <.01).

CONCLUSION

Similar to spontaneous labor, the start of the active phase of induced labor was at 6 cm of dilation. Comparatively, induced labor had a shorter active phase than spontaneous labor. These findings suggest that the current criteria for active phase arrest provided by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists do not need to be lengthened for individuals in induced labor.

摘要

目的

比较引产和自然分娩产妇的产程曲线。

方法

这是对安全分娩联合会数据库的二次分析,纳入足月单胎头位经阴道分娩的初产妇和经产妇,包括自然分娩和引产。排除子宫破裂和新生儿 5 分钟 Apgar 评分<7 分、分娩损伤或新生儿重症监护病房入院的产妇。我们采用重复测量分析的多项式函数来模拟宫颈扩张的过程。我们采用区间 censored 回归比较了引产和自然分娩的横径时间(两个给定的扩张指标之间的时间)。

结果

在 46835 例初产妇中,18576 例和 28259 例分别行引产和自然分娩;在 77503 例经产妇中,29684 例和 47819 例分别行引产和自然分娩。无论产次如何,引产的活跃期起点均为 6cm。在初产妇中,与自然分娩相比,引产从 6cm 到 10cm 的横径时间更短(中位数 1.8 小时[5 百分位至 95 百分位 0.4-8.6 小时]vs 2.3 小时[5 百分位至 95 百分位 0.6-9.4 小时];P<.01)。在经产妇中,与自然分娩相比,引产从 6cm 到 10cm 的横径时间更短(中位数 0.9 小时[5 百分位至 95 百分位 0.1-6.0 小时]vs 1.4 小时[5 百分位至 95 百分位 0.3-7.9 小时];P<.01)。

结论

与自然分娩相似,引产的活跃期起点为 6cm 扩张。相对而言,引产的活跃期比自然分娩短。这些发现表明,美国妇产科医师学会提供的活跃期停止标准不需要为引产产妇延长。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验