• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于共识制定的巴西卫生系统循证决策能力概况:过程和结果。

An evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM) competency profile for the Brazilian Health System developed through consensus: process and outcomes.

机构信息

Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.

Fiocruz (Oswaldo Cruz Foundation), Brasília, Brazil.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Oct 12;21(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01052-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-023-01052-z
PMID:37828575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10571264/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM) requires a set of individual and organizational knowledge, skills and attitudes that should be articulated with background factors and needs. In this regard, the development of an EIPM competency profile is important to support the diagnosis, planning and implementation of EIPM.

PURPOSE

To present the process and outcomes of the development of an EIPM competency profile by an expert committee, to be applied in different contexts of the Brazilian Health System.

METHODS

A committee of experts in EIPM shared different views, experiences and opinions to develop an EIPM competency profile for Brazil. In six consensus workshops mediated by facilitators, the committee defined from macro problems to key actions and performances essential for the competency profile. The development steps consisted of: (1) Constitution of the committee, including researchers, professionals with practical experience, managers, and educators; (2) Development of a rapid review on EIPM competency profiles; (3) Agreement on commitments and responsibilities in the processes; (4) Identification and definition of macro problems relating to the scope of the competency profile; and (5) Outlining of general and specific capacities, to be incorporated into the competency profile, categorized by key actions.

RESULTS

The development of the EIPM competency profile was guided by the following macro problems: (1) lack of systematic and transparent decision-making processes in health policy management; (2) underdeveloped institutional capacity for knowledge management and translation; and (3) incipient use of scientific evidence in the formulation and implementation of health policies. A general framework of key actions and performances of the EIPM Competency Profile for Brazil was developed, including 42 specific and general key actions distributed by area of activity (Health Management, Scientific Research, Civil Society, Knowledge Translation, and Cross-sectional areas).

CONCLUSIONS

The competency profile presented in this article can be used in different contexts as a key tool for the institutionalization of EIPM.

摘要

背景

循证决策(EIPM)需要一套个人和组织知识、技能和态度,这些知识、技能和态度应该与背景因素和需求联系起来。在这方面,制定 EIPM 能力概况对于支持 EIPM 的诊断、规划和实施非常重要。

目的

介绍一个专家委员会制定 EIPM 能力概况的过程和结果,该能力概况将适用于巴西卫生系统的不同背景。

方法

一个由 EIPM 专家组成的委员会分享了不同的观点、经验和意见,为巴西制定了 EIPM 能力概况。在六次由主持人主持的共识研讨会中,委员会从宏观问题到关键行动和绩效定义了能力概况的关键要素。开发步骤包括:(1)委员会的组成,包括研究人员、具有实践经验的专业人员、管理人员和教育工作者;(2)快速审查 EIPM 能力概况;(3)对流程中的承诺和责任达成一致;(4)确定与能力概况范围相关的宏观问题;(5)概述一般和具体能力,将其分类为关键行动,纳入能力概况。

结果

EIPM 能力概况的制定遵循以下宏观问题:(1)卫生政策管理中缺乏系统和透明的决策过程;(2)知识管理和转化的机构能力不足;(3)在制定和实施卫生政策方面,科学证据的使用刚刚起步。制定了巴西 EIPM 能力概况的一般关键行动和绩效框架,包括 42 项具体和一般关键行动,按活动领域(卫生管理、科学研究、民间社会、知识转化和跨领域)分布。

结论

本文介绍的能力概况可在不同背景下用作 EIPM 制度化的关键工具。

相似文献

1
An evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM) competency profile for the Brazilian Health System developed through consensus: process and outcomes.基于共识制定的巴西卫生系统循证决策能力概况:过程和结果。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Oct 12;21(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01052-z.
2
Competency profiles for evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM): a rapid review.循证决策能力框架:快速综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Feb 8;21(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00964-0.
3
Knowledge brokering between researchers and policymakers in Fiji to develop policies to reduce obesity: a process evaluation.斐济研究人员与政策制定者之间的知识中介,以制定减少肥胖的政策:过程评估。
Implement Sci. 2013 Jul 1;8:74. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-74.
4
Individual and institutional capacity-building for evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: a mix of local and global evidence.伊朗基于证据的卫生决策制定的个人和机构能力建设:本地和全球证据的混合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 12;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00816-3.
5
Development of measurable indicators to enhance public health evidence-informed policy-making.制定可衡量指标,以加强公共卫生循证决策。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 31;16(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0323-z.
6
Participants' perceptions of a knowledge-brokering strategy to facilitate evidence-informed policy-making in Fiji.参与者对一项旨在促进斐济循证决策的知识中介策略的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 7;13:725. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-725.
7
From bench to policy: a critical analysis of models for evidence-informed policymaking in healthcare.从基础研究到政策制定:医疗保健中循证决策模型的批判性分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 26;12:1264315. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1264315. eCollection 2024.
8
Evidence-Informed Policy-Making: Are We Doing Enough? Comment on "Examining and Contextualizing Approaches to Establish Policy Support Organizations - A Mixed Method Study".循证决策:我们做得够吗?评“审视和背景化建立政策支持组织的方法-一项混合方法研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1974-1976. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7010. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
9
How COVID-19 affects the use of evidence informed policymaking among iranian health policymakers and managers.新冠疫情如何影响伊朗卫生政策制定者和管理者基于证据的政策制定的应用。
Arch Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;80(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00757-3.
10
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.

本文引用的文献

1
A KSA system for competency-based assessment of clinicians' professional development in China and quality gap analysis.基于能力的中国临床医生专业发展的 KSA 系统评估和质量差距分析。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2037401. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2037401.
2
Comparison of the Informed Health Choices Key Concepts Framework to other frameworks relevant to teaching and learning how to think critically about health claims and choices: a systematic review.比较知情健康选择关键概念框架与其他与教授和学习如何批判性思考健康声明和选择相关的框架:系统评价。
F1000Res. 2020 Mar 5;9:164. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21858.1. eCollection 2020.
3
Leadership and Management Competencies for Hospital Managers: A Systematic Review and Best-Fit Framework Synthesis.医院管理者的领导力与管理能力:系统评价与最佳适配框架综合分析
J Healthc Leadersh. 2020 Jul 22;12:59-68. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S265825. eCollection 2020.
4
A literature review of knowledge translation and partnership research training programs for health researchers.健康研究人员知识转化和伙伴关系研究培训计划的文献回顾。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0497-z.
5
Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems.非洲卫生系统中知识转化策略、结果、促进因素和障碍的证据图谱。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Feb 7;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0419-0.
6
The Role of the Nurse Scientist as a Knowledge Broker.护士科学家作为知识经纪人的角色。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 Jan;51(1):26-39. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12439. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
7
Evidence-based practice educational intervention studies: a systematic review of what is taught and how it is measured.循证实践教育干预研究:对所教内容及其测量方法的系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 1;18(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1284-1.
8
Core knowledge translation competencies: a scoping review.核心知识翻译能力:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 27;18(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3314-4.
9
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers.政策制定者使用证据的障碍与促进因素的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 3;14:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2.
10
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: linking guidance development to policy development.卫生系统循证政策指南:将指南制定与政策制定联系起来。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001186. Epub 2012 Mar 13.