Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;31(1):36-41. doi: 10.1111/acem.14822. Epub 2023 Nov 5.
This study aims to assess the change in cervical spine (C-spine) immobilization frequency in trauma patients over time. We hypothesize that the frequency of unnecessary C-spine immobilization has decreased.
A retrospective chart review of adult trauma patients transported to our American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma center from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021, was performed. Emergency medical services documentation was manually reviewed to record prehospital physiology and the application of a prehospital cervical collar (c-collar). C-spine injuries were defined as cervical vertebral fractures and/or spinal cord injuries. Univariate and year-by-year trend analyses were used to assess changes in C-spine injury and immobilization frequency.
Among 2906 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 12% sustained C-spine injuries, while 88% did not. Patients with C-spine injuries were more likely to experience blunt trauma (95% vs. 68%, p < 0.001), were older (46 years vs. 41 years, p < 0.001), and had higher Injury Severity Scores (31 vs. 18, p < 0.001). They also exhibited lower initial systolic blood pressures (108 mm Hg vs. 119 mm Hg, p < 0.001), lower heart rates (92 beats/min vs. 97 beats/min, p < 0.05), and lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (9 vs. 11, p < 0.001). In blunt trauma, c-collars were applied to 83% of patients with C-spine injuries and 75% without; for penetrating trauma, c-collars were applied to 50% of patients with C-spine injuries and only 8% without. Among penetrating trauma patients with C-spine injury, all patients either arrived quadriplegic or did not require emergent neurosurgical intervention. The proportion of patients receiving a c-collar decreased in both blunt and penetrating traumas from 2014 to 2021 (blunt-82% in 2014 to 68% in 2021; penetrating-24% in 2014 to 6% in 2021).
Unnecessary C-spine stabilization has decreased from 2014 to 2021. However, c-collars are still being applied to patients who do not need them, both in blunt and in penetrating trauma cases, while not being applied to patients who would benefit from them.
本研究旨在评估创伤患者颈椎(C 脊柱)固定频率随时间的变化。我们假设不必要的颈椎固定的频率已经降低。
对 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间被送往我们的美国外科医师学院认证的一级创伤中心的成年创伤患者进行回顾性图表审查。手动审查了急诊医疗服务记录,以记录院前生理学和院前颈托(颈托)的应用。颈椎损伤定义为颈椎骨折和/或脊髓损伤。使用单变量和逐年趋势分析来评估颈椎损伤和固定频率的变化。
在符合纳入标准的 2906 名患者中,12%发生颈椎损伤,88%没有。有颈椎损伤的患者更有可能经历钝性创伤(95%比 68%,p<0.001),年龄更大(46 岁比 41 岁,p<0.001),损伤严重程度评分更高(31 比 18,p<0.001)。他们还表现出较低的初始收缩压(108mmHg 比 119mmHg,p<0.001)、较低的心率(92 次/分比 97 次/分,p<0.05)和较低的格拉斯哥昏迷评分(9 比 11,p<0.001)。在钝性创伤中,颈托应用于 83%的颈椎损伤患者和 75%的无颈椎损伤患者;在穿透性创伤中,颈托应用于 50%的颈椎损伤患者和 8%的无颈椎损伤患者。在穿透性创伤且有颈椎损伤的患者中,所有患者要么四肢瘫痪,要么不需要紧急神经外科干预。无论是在钝性还是穿透性创伤中,2014 年至 2021 年期间接受颈托固定的患者比例均有所下降(钝性创伤从 2014 年的 82%下降至 2021 年的 68%;穿透性创伤从 2014 年的 24%下降至 2021 年的 6%)。
从 2014 年到 2021 年,不必要的颈椎稳定已经减少。然而,颈托仍在应用于不需要的患者,无论是在钝性还是穿透性创伤中,而没有应用于那些可能受益于颈托的患者。