Gan Zhenzhong, Zheng Lurong, Wang Suiping, Feng Gangyi
Philosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;14:1132570. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132570. eCollection 2023.
A fundamental objective in Auditory Sciences is to understand how people learn to generalize auditory category knowledge in new situations. How we generalize to novel scenarios speaks to the nature of acquired category representations and generalization mechanisms in handling perceptual variabilities and novelty. The dual learning system (DLS) framework proposes that auditory category learning involves an explicit, hypothesis-testing learning system, which is optimal for learning rule-based (RB) categories, and an implicit, procedural-based learning system, which is optimal for learning categories requiring pre-decisional information integration (II) across acoustic dimensions. Although DLS describes distinct mechanisms of two types of category learning, it is yet clear the nature of acquired representations and how we transfer them to new contexts. Here, we conducted three experiments to examine differences between II and RB category representations by examining what acoustic and perceptual novelties and variabilities affect learners' generalization success. Learners can successfully categorize different sets of untrained sounds after only eight blocks of training for both II and RB categories. The category structures and novel contexts differentially modulated the generalization success. The II learners significantly decreased generalization performances when categorizing new items derived from an untrained perceptual area and in a context with more distributed samples. In contrast, RB learners' generalizations are resistant to changes in perceptual regions but are sensitive to changes in sound dispersity. Representational similarity modeling revealed that the generalization in the more dispersed sampling context was accomplished differently by II and RB learners. II learners increased representations of perceptual similarity and decision distance to compensate for the decreased transfer of category representations, whereas the RB learners used a more computational cost strategy by default, computing the decision-bound distance to guide generalization decisions. These results suggest that distinct representations emerged after learning the two types of category structures and using different computations and flexible mechanisms in resolving generalization challenges when facing novel perceptual variability in new contexts. These findings provide new evidence for dissociated representations of auditory categories and reveal novel generalization mechanisms in resolving variabilities to maintain perceptual constancy.
听觉科学的一个基本目标是了解人们如何学会在新情况下概括听觉类别知识。我们如何将其推广到新的场景,这涉及到习得的类别表征的本质以及在处理感知变异性和新颖性时的推广机制。双学习系统(DLS)框架提出,听觉类别学习涉及一个明确的、基于假设检验的学习系统,它最适合学习基于规则(RB)的类别,以及一个隐含的、基于程序的学习系统,它最适合学习需要在声学维度上进行决策前信息整合(II)的类别。尽管DLS描述了两种类型的类别学习的不同机制,但习得表征的本质以及我们如何将它们转移到新情境中仍不清楚。在这里,我们进行了三项实验,通过研究哪些声学和感知上的新颖性和变异性会影响学习者的推广成功,来检验II类和RB类别的表征之间的差异。学习者在对II类和RB类别的声音进行仅八个训练块的训练后,就能成功地对不同组的未训练声音进行分类。类别结构和新情境对推广成功有不同的调节作用。II类学习者在对从未训练的感知区域衍生出的新项目进行分类时,以及在样本分布更分散的情境中,其推广表现显著下降。相比之下,RB类学习者的推广对感知区域的变化具有抗性,但对声音分散度的变化敏感。表征相似性建模显示,在样本分布更分散的情境中,II类和RB类学习者的推广方式不同。II类学习者增加了感知相似性和决策距离的表征,以补偿类别表征转移的减少,而RB类学习者默认使用一种计算成本更高的策略,计算决策边界距离以指导推广决策。这些结果表明,在学习了两种类型的类别结构并在面对新情境中的新颖感知变异性时,使用不同的计算方法和灵活机制来解决推广挑战后,出现了不同的表征。这些发现为听觉类别的分离表征提供了新证据,并揭示了在解决变异性以保持感知恒常性方面的新颖推广机制。