Roark Casey L, Holt Lori L
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University and the Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Oct;80(7):1804-1822. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1552-5.
There is substantial evidence that two distinct learning systems are engaged in category learning. One is principally engaged when learning requires selective attention to a single dimension (rule-based), and the other is drawn online by categories requiring integration across two or more dimensions (information-integration). This distinction has largely been drawn from studies of visual categories learned via overt category decisions and explicit feedback. Recent research has extended this model to auditory categories, the nature of which introduces new questions for research. With the present experiment, we addressed the influences of incidental versus overt training and category distribution sampling on learning information-integration and rule-based auditory categories. The results demonstrate that the training task influences category learning, with overt feedback generally outperforming incidental feedback. Additionally, distribution sampling (probabilistic or deterministic) and category type (information-integration or rule-based) both affect how well participants are able to learn. Specifically, rule-based categories are learned equivalently, regardless of distribution sampling, whereas information-integration categories are learned better with deterministic than with probabilistic sampling. The interactions of distribution sampling, category type, and kind of feedback impacted category-learning performance, but these interactions have not yet been integrated into existing category-learning models. These results suggest new dimensions for understanding category learning, inspired by the real-world properties of auditory categories.
有大量证据表明,两种不同的学习系统参与了类别学习。一种主要在学习需要对单一维度进行选择性注意时起作用(基于规则),另一种则由需要整合两个或更多维度的类别在线激活(信息整合)。这种区别很大程度上来自于通过公开的类别决策和明确反馈来学习视觉类别的研究。最近的研究已将此模型扩展到听觉类别,而听觉类别的性质为研究带来了新问题。通过本实验,我们探讨了附带训练与公开训练以及类别分布抽样对学习信息整合和基于规则的听觉类别的影响。结果表明,训练任务会影响类别学习,公开反馈通常优于附带反馈。此外,分布抽样(概率性或确定性)和类别类型(信息整合或基于规则)都会影响参与者的学习效果。具体而言,无论分布抽样如何,基于规则的类别学习效果相当,而信息整合类别在确定性抽样下比在概率性抽样下学习得更好。分布抽样、类别类型和反馈类型之间的相互作用影响了类别学习表现,但这些相互作用尚未被纳入现有的类别学习模型。这些结果为理解类别学习提出了新的维度,这是受到听觉类别的现实世界属性启发得出的。