Kata Yuki, Hara Yu, Murohashi Kota, Saigusa Yusuke, Nagasawa Ryo, Tagami Yoichi, Fujii Hiroaki, Aoki Ayako, Nishikawa Yurika, Tanaka Katsushi, Watanabe Keisuke, Horita Nobuyuki, Kobayashi Nobuaki, Yamamoto Masaki, Kudo Makoto, Kaneko Takeshi
Department of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2023 Aug;85(3):602-611. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.85.3.602.
Acute exacerbation (AE) of interstitial pneumonia (IP) shows poor prognosis, due to the typical histological pattern of diffuse alveolar damage superimposed upon lung fibrosis. The previous reports comparing clinical features between AE of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) and those of IPs with known etiology are limited. We retrospectively compared clinical parameters including age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index score (CCIS), blood biomarkers at diagnosis of AE, treatment, and 3-month mortality between patients with AE of IIPs and collagen vascular disease-associated interstitial pneumonia (CVD-IP). We assessed 85 patients, comprising 66 patients with AE of IIPs (78%) and 19 patients with AE of CVD-IP (22%). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression selected CCIS (hazard ratio, 1.281; 95% confidence interval, 1.055-1.556; P = 0.012) and log serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (hazard ratio, 6.267; 95% confidence interval, 2.172-18.085; P < 0.001) as significant predictors of 3-month mortality among these patients. Also, the adjusted survival curves using sex, CCIS, and serum LDH showed no significant differences between these two groups. In conclusion, among AE patients, CCIS and serum LDH level may be more important prognostic factors for 3-month mortality rather than two classification of IP subtypes: IIPs and CVD-IP.
间质性肺炎(IP)的急性加重(AE)预后较差,这是由于在肺纤维化基础上叠加了典型的弥漫性肺泡损伤组织学模式。既往比较特发性间质性肺炎(IIPs)的AE与已知病因的IPs的AE临床特征的报告有限。我们回顾性比较了IIPs的AE患者和胶原血管病相关间质性肺炎(CVD-IP)患者的临床参数,包括年龄、性别、查尔森合并症指数评分(CCIS)、AE诊断时的血液生物标志物、治疗情况以及3个月死亡率。我们评估了85例患者,其中66例为IIPs的AE患者(78%),19例为CVD-IP的AE患者(22%)。最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归分析选择CCIS(风险比,1.281;95%置信区间,1.055 - 1.556;P = 0.012)和血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)对数(风险比,6.267;95%置信区间,2.172 - 18.085;P < 0.001)作为这些患者3个月死亡率的显著预测因素。此外,使用性别、CCIS和血清LDH调整后的生存曲线显示这两组之间无显著差异。总之,在AE患者中,CCIS和血清LDH水平可能是3个月死亡率更重要的预后因素,而非IP的两种亚型分类:IIPs和CVD-IP。